• Full Story

Labour offers longer parental leave, ditching 90-day bill

Print

Mon, 19 Sep 2011 6:13a.m.

Labour will extend the coverage and length of paid parental leave

Labour will extend the coverage and length of paid parental leave

Extended paid parental leave and a long-term goal to eradicate family violence are two of the Labour Party's plans to improve the situation for women in New Zealand.

The party released its Women's Policy on Suffrage Day, Monday, to emphasise there is still much to be done to ensure women have the opportunity to thrive and succeed, the party's women's affairs spokeswoman Carol Beaumont says.

New Zealand women, on average, earn less than men and are less likely to hold leadership roles, she says.

The party will:

* Extend the coverage and length of paid parental leave

* Establish a Commission on Sexual and Family Violence to advise the government and help build a plan to eradicate violence against women

* Provide free dental care for pregnant women, because of strong links between poor oral health and premature birth, and children being likely to take after their parents in this area

* Develop nationwide services for women with eating disorders and programs to address binge drinking in young women

* Require children to be enrolled before birth with a Well Child provider, such as Plunket, with a mother's permission, to ensure there are no gaps after a midwife's care, minimising the risk of family violence, child abuse and neglect

* Reinstate a goal to have 50 percent of women on state sector boards

* Promote flexible working arrangements for women help them balance conflict between family and work responsibilities

* Make pay-rate information available to expose inequalities between men and women in the workforce

* Scrap the 90 day fire-at-will legislation, which Labour says disproportionately disadvantages women, who are more likely to move in and out of the workforce because of family responsibilities

NZN

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

01 Oct 2011 07:01a.m.

Kevin M wrote:

Docters cost $100.00 in Invercargill if you are on any kind of pension or benefit & require there services,they still will not "care" for you at all/properly untill they have confirmation from Winz that the bill has been paid,if you require proper care (pregnancy to arm falling off)go to the A&E at the hospital.You will also be told you have to pay for your own xrays/ultrasound on top of that costs,"no" not chilc friendly city at all.

20 Sep 2011 09:59a.m.

cherie wrote:

Dave2 sorry but employees pretty near had to murder someone before you could sack them. You could employ someone who has said they had skills in X,Y,Z areas and then once you gave them the job you found out they didnt. You then had to spend time and money retraining them. That was rubbish. In small business if you have a really neat team 1 new person coming in can ruin it for everyone. With the 90 day law those who didnt fit in were on their way. How terrible having a law that allows employers to have on their staff people they actually want.

19 Sep 2011 09:37p.m.

Mike Readman wrote:

Yeah right Dave2. Who wants no GST on fruit and veges??? Phil Goff, Annette King and....and....that's about it.

19 Sep 2011 08:21p.m.

eddie wrote:

lol, great to see 'The Standard' handing out the laptop to the great unwashed, delicious and happy to see you all getting out and about before dole day!...national wil win alone this election and we , as a country, will benefit and move forward...not backward and rewarding 15yr olds for having kids and indeed the thick and lazy leaving school and moaning they get minimum wage packing shelves...you leftir=es think they should get everything...they should get what they put into life and education...nothing!

19 Sep 2011 05:33p.m.

Dave2 wrote:

Andrew - get a life. The 90 Day Act discriminates, and there are plenty of instances of people being laid off between the 80th & 90th days. Before the 90 Day Legislation there was always due process legislation for employers to deal with those who weren't performing - employers just had to obey the law and use it properly. Not hard to do but - many deliberately didn't because they couldn't be bothered and tried to take shortcuts. Other commentators - remember cheaper doctor's visits under Labour; Labour brought in Flexible Working Hours Legislation; Paid Parental Leave has been around for years and the sky hasn't fallen ; and if you read the research and the papers you will see that NZ has a big Pay Equity Problem and a big problem with the gender balance on boards. Great policies Labour. The kind of policies that show you actually know what goes on in the real world. Like the economic policies that say first $5000 tax-free for all; No GST on fresh fruit & veg; & a decent Minimum Wage. Don't see National delivering anything that speaks to ordinary families about dealing with the galloping Cost of Living or the jobs crisis - they promised 170,000 jobs, but haven't created one; they promised a tax cut and raised GST at same time. Also look at your facts - the last Labour Govt paid down NZ's debt & created KiwiSaver and KiwiBank, & had very low unemployment. The current National govt just wants to sell the family silver overseas (so it can follow the thousands who are leaving for Australia - the worst figures in 30 years). Great Policies Labour! And your Caucus and List looks much more gender balanced than National's. Its called walking the talk.

19 Sep 2011 12:51p.m.

Andrew wrote:

Any Employer with any brains will keep good staff after a 90 day trial period and the current legislation certainly encourages Employers to take on additional staff without the fear of draconian Employment laws where they are subject to unfair treatment if a new employee is clearly unsuited to the job they have taken on. These suggestions are just more desperate political posturing and I also want to know who is going to pay for these hairbrained ideas.

19 Sep 2011 12:42p.m.

Robo wrote:

If Labour came up with a policy of dropping all these so-called fix-it ideas and alot of variable benefit options and just planted more money into better education then maybe they might actually get a vote.
Getting a higher quality educated, motorvated and passionate person into the work-force is what will lift the entire country but it will take probably 15-20 years for this to happen and see benefits but alas I suspect in 15-20 years we will see people on benefits - but hey they might have nice teeth.
Labour are all about giving false hope through weak policy and thoughts along with plunging the country into further debt, higher unemployment and not encouraging business development, individual talent and investment into our great little country..

19 Sep 2011 12:34p.m.

Nik wrote:

Another example of Labour promising more and more and telling people what they want to hear. Labour hand out more and more, and National are left to attempt to clean it up, until inevitably they look like the bad guys, Labour get back in and the whole vicious cycle starts again. This is one example, their plan for Canterbury is another.. it goes on and on. Are National perfect? Hell no.. Gerry Brownlee, yuck. Bill English... no personality... Asset sales? Bad, but they were left with few options following Labours 9 years in office. But... you take all of Nationals bad pints, multiply them by 5, and they still make for a better Government than Labour ESPECIALLY while Phil Goff is in charge!

19 Sep 2011 12:21p.m.

A Waghorn wrote:

It's a shame Labour can't develop a policy that addresses all Family Violence. Mind you, they have a proven track record of ignoring any research that implicates women in this area. It's a shame, because it doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand that you can't cure a problem by only addressing a part of it.

19 Sep 2011 10:50a.m.

kelvyn wrote:

Labour just cant get passed the need to suck up to various interest groups. They also don't seem to get that many people are tired of policy and programmes that use someones elses money to achieve their goals. (extended paid parental leave)Why does pregnancy entitle you to free dental care for example. If you have bad teeth and don't want to fix them maybe you shouldn't get pregnant. Bit radical, but why not, just get your hand out of my pocket.