• Full Story

Labour would reinstate sacked ECan board

Print

Tue, 27 Apr 2010 7:37p.m.

The Labour Party is pledging to rescind the legislation it says "foisted" commissioners on Environment Canterbury.

The Government sacked the council and appointed a panel of commissioners, saying water management in the region was a shambles.

Labour's water spokesman, Brendon Burns, said today his party had always taken a very strong line against sacking a democratically elected body.

"As a Canterbury MP I have been challenged to say if Labour's opposition to the ECan Act will be followed by reinstatement of the council, or a similar democratically elected body when Labour wins next year's election," he said.

"The answer is yes, and caucus supported that strongly today."

The Government intends going ahead with council elections in 2013, but Mr Burns said there were signals it might not do that.

"Cantabrians are worried that National prefers the recommendation in the Wyatt Creech report it commissioned around a Regional Water Authority, perhaps an appointed body," he said.

"Labour has too much faith in the intelligence of Canterbury voters to go down that route."

It was reported earlier today that cabinet papers showed planning for an inquiry into Canterbury's water problems began before the last election, and officials told the previous government the problems could be more important for the economy than Auckland's governance.

Former Labour environment minister Trevor Mallard sought advice from the ministry on a possible inquiry into Environment Canterbury, The Press newspaper reported.

"Backlogs in resource consent processing, caused by a surge in new applications for taking water coupled with a shortage of appropriately qualified and skilled staff, are adding further fuel to expressions of public concern," the officials said.

Mr Mallard said the inquiry was not carried out because the 2008 election got in the way.

"If you look at the timing of all that, it got to the point where I thought it was inappropriate to head towards intervening. But we were looking at designing a solution," he said.

NZPA

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

28 Apr 2010 12:26p.m.

roxanne wrote:

Ah but Doug knew you would comment and you did! Predictable? However in this case I agree with your view.

28 Apr 2010 11:35a.m.

Lightseed wrote:

interesting that you cannot comment without me holding your hand Doug, weird that as an adult you have to include a statement about me when i haven't even commented, almost like you are a stalker. And Reece, a number of canterbury residents who aren't farmers support what national has done. And as a Canty resident this is one reason my vote wont go back to Labour. ECAN was a mess, such that most people commenting on ECAN in the past do not realise how bad it was. ECAN was also giving water rights to farmers in areas where the water rights had already been over extended. They had extended themselves into local council areas, meaning that a person building a simple wood sheed on their property needed to get a permit from ECAN instead of their local council to build it. Canterbury has waited too long for water management to be sorted out.

28 Apr 2010 08:31a.m.

Reece wrote:

Lightseed will blame labour.. although I think disbanding any elected group is undemocratic and National should have forced an election rather than taking control in the fashion that they did.

I know alot of canterbury residents that are unhappy about this... not the farmers however lol, they know that National favours them.

27 Apr 2010 10:10p.m.

Doug wrote:

Even Labour were investigating Ecan before National did something about the mess. Talk about hunting for electoral approval but procratinating when something should have been done!

Where is that outspoken Lightseed in all this? He has an opinion on everything and everyone.