Labour's Nash blames media slant for defeat

Print

Sun, 27 Nov 2011 10:46a.m.

Stuart Nash says Phil Goff would have been better off had the media been more positive over the past two and half years

Stuart Nash says Phil Goff would have been better off had the media been more positive over the past two and half years

By 3news.co.nz staff

Among the election casualties are a range of Labour Party stalwarts including Stuart Nash, their candidate in Napier.

He was considered one of Labour's brightest MPs.

He lost to the incumbent National Chris Tremain who had his majority cut by more than 6000 votes.

“I’m a little bit gutted,” says Mr Nash. “I’m gutted for myself, I’m gutted for Kelvin Davis, who is one of my best mates, Carmel Sepuloni and also the other Labour MPs who didn’t make it. I thought we were a good team.”

“But that was yesterday, today’s a new day.

“You’ve got John Key who’s got seven PR in his office. We haven’t even got that amount of media staff looking after 43 MPs.”

VIDEO: John Key’s post-victory speech
Key toasts three more years
Banks takes Epsom, Brash steps down
Winston Peters’ triumphant return
Greens celebrate record result

Mr Nash says from here he is focusing on the next election.

“I’m going to take today off, we start again tomorrow.

“If you have a look at it, it’s quite interesting. We all know things go around in swings and roundabouts. ACT’s decimated, you won’t see NZ First again, I very much doubt. National is about to run out of support partners. 2014 you will see Labour back and I don’t know where National will end up, they will have no support partners.”

Non-listed MP Damien O’Connor won the West Coast, after being dropped from the Labour list by saying they were a “gaggle of gays”.

Mr Nash says in this caucus term there have been some sewer rats who have come out and said things they should not have.

“Chris Carter came out and said what he said, which was totally uncalled for. He broke everything that Labour holds sacred.”

He says he will play no part in speculating whether or not Phil Goff will maintain his leadership.

“Let me tell you one thing about Phil Goff, this is a man of huge integrity. For two and half years he was told he couldn’t make it. In the final month when we finally saw what the man was made of, people realised, ‘shivers this guy has got what it takes’.

“If the media could have focused on the positive side of Phil Goff for two and half years I think the result would have been different.

“John Key was having photo ops in front of Taj Mahal while Goff was traipsing up and down the country.”

Mr Nash says it is Mr Goff’s decision to stay on as leader and he has been around for a long time. But he says if the re-elected Mt Roskill MP wants to stay, someone would have to mount a very strong case to show that they were better than Phil Goff. “He has run a brilliant campaign.

“Watch this space, three years will fly and I guarantee 2014 you will have the Labour leader speaking as the next prime minister.”

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

03 Dec 2011 02:03p.m.

luke wrote:

i think mr nash is correct there needs to be an investigation into how the media operates in polotics in new zealand . dont forget the people can only realy base their opinions on what the media tell is . and all they told us was we love john key to hell with unemployment etc . the opposition can not gain traction when the media also never holds a government to account . i enjoyed tv3 election covrage , i dont watch tv one and the tory auckland hosking set they are outragesly biased . mr espinar could not keep in his depression that the nats did not get an out right majority . he was holding his head in his hands . but there is no bias its our imagination sure .well said mr nash .

03 Dec 2011 12:44a.m.

Johanna wrote:

If the Labour Party chiefs knew what they were doing, why are you languishing off the bottom of the elected list Stuart?

Andrew Little is doing well already, but he needs other activists from the 'coalface' right beside him plugging away at these areas. Pat Newman could have done similar things in Education given his chance, and been more effective than anyone else. Yet where was he on the list when we needed him? The Labour Party list is too political.

Labour needs its "A" team in Parliment. How to achieve? The opportunities for Opposition activism have never been more numerous than they are now - it is important that Winston Peters and the also the Green Party are not seen as leading the charge - in so many cases.

01 Dec 2011 03:08p.m.

Shirley Knuckey wrote:

Labour will always be a "broad church". Its opponents will continue to quote ad nauseum that O'conner comment, cite Jones' hotel room in-house viewing, re-run the Carter syndrome but they will be back, and probably a brave new front will be needed. Come in David Shearer! National has re-jigged itself, to the extent that in contrast to the anti-Labour Nyah,Nyah of 'too many gays and unionists' it has embraced celebrity PM'ism, and looks as though a woman must have the blonde look. What's this about - Jo, Crusher, Nikki, Amy, Louise et al? We're in changing times Eddie; being 'Left' nowadays means we can float from one to t'other - Green to Labour and back again. It's all social democracy and light years removed from overly capitalist self-first'ism.

01 Dec 2011 12:41a.m.

charles wilson wrote:

rubbish phil goff was not the man, labour did not rebuild and failed how stupid were they to enter the race with a man on 7% popularity, not stupid, deliberate suicide more likely, and if they dont front up with new blood doomed again, parker hardly a man to admire or robertson and as for Jones a certain death warrant.

27 Nov 2011 01:08p.m.

gadfly wrote:

Nash acknowledges Chris Carter's role in Labours downfall. O'Connor's mention of the "gaggle of gays" is a sober warning. Labour needs to sort out its tolerance of "radical" gay politics in light of what the electorate could reasonably be expected to tolerate. The public should not be expected to accept people like Chris Carter and Darren Hughes who can't keep their personal lifestyles and their roles as public figures separate. Must more traditional New Zealand people's welfare continually run second to the interests of the gay lobby ? It would seem they cannot successfully co-exist in 2011. Imagine in the future Labout supporting legal adoption rights for gay people .. Would Labour let such a policy cost it another election ? Labour can't afford to take any more chances on association in the public mind with "radical" gay politics if it wishes to have the support of the majority of New Zealanders. Hughes and Carter have seen to that.

27 Nov 2011 01:08p.m.

gadfly wrote:

Nash acknowledges Chris Carter's role in Labours downfall. O'Connor's mention of the "gaggle of gays" is a sober warning. Labour needs to sort out its tolerance of "radical" gay politics in light of what the electorate could reasonably be expected to tolerate. The public should not be expected to accept people like Chris Carter and Darren Hughes who can't keep their personal lifestyles and their roles as public figures separate. Must more traditional New Zealand people's welfare continually run second to the interests of the gay lobby ? It would seem they cannot successfully co-exist in 2011. Imagine in the future Labout supporting legal adoption rights for gay people .. Would Labour let such a policy cost it another election ? Labour can't afford to take any more chances on association in the public mind with "radical" gay politics if it wishes to have the support of the majority of New Zealanders. Hughes and Carter have seen to that.

27 Nov 2011 11:09a.m.

eddie wrote:

Haahaa, here we go...nothing to do with Labours policies nor a crappy leader...it's, one agiain, others fault! CLASSIC, thank you Mr Nash for stating what we all knew was the 'defence' of worst result in over 80yrs...wonderful!!