Labour's reshuffle: Robertson up, Dyson to go?

Print

Mon, 31 Jan 2011 2:57p.m.

Labour leader Phil Goff (NZPA file)

Labour leader Phil Goff (NZPA file)

By Duncan Garner

Phil Goff's about to embark on a seriously difficult job; reshuffling the Labour Caucus.

It's a tough job. It's one of the toughest in politics, it's much harder than most people think. He has to deal with misplaced egos, jealousies, rivalries, and worst of all, Labour's factions.

But this is a big opportunity for Phil Goff. It's a chance to further distance himself and the party from the perception that Helen Clark's trolls remain in charge under the bridge.

Clark actually never embarked on significant reshuffles herself. She did two. She was wary of them. Both came after her 2002 and 2005 election victories. They were neither big nor bold. She knew how unsettling they were for the caucus and the party. A big reshuffle will always put noses out of joint.

But there are some people Goff must reward.

A stand-out performer, overdue for a promotion to the front bench is the party's State Services and Tertiary Education spokesman Grant Roberston. I predict he will lead the party one day - so there's the kiss of death for him! Robertson must be looked after by Goff. He may get health, but there-in lies a big problem.

To be given health, and a front bench seat, someone has to be demoted. Ruth Dyson currently has health and has been around the party for a long time and will be hard to prise out of the portfolio and her front bench seat. But no one has a mortgage on their job. It's extremely complicated moving Dyson but she seems the obvious one to go, she's the most vulnerable.

Look at the front bench, Goff, King, Mallard, David Parker, Cunliffe, Dyson, Cosgrove, Street, Horomia, Mahuta and Chauvel.

Mahuta and Chauvel were only appointed late last year. They can't be demoted so early, nor do they deserve to go. Chauvel appears to be working hard. Street will stay where she is because I'm told it's about "balance." Horomia is the senior Maori MP. Mallard is nailing Anne Tolley. Parker is critical to the party's economic development. Cunliffe stays. Cosgrove performs most weeks. King won't be going anywhere until she wants to. She's tough as teak. But Dyson is vulnerable and is being lined up.

My sources indicate to me that Dyson may have accepted her fate and will announce she's "stepping down" to take less of a frontline role. It doesn't mean she's retiring from politics, it means she's moving off the frontbench. The deal, the swap allows Robertson to take her spot.

The other interesting movement could be around Mahuta. I understand she too may ease herself off the frontbench. She has a baby and that certainly is complicating. But Mahuta may have decided to have a second child, and that would certainly see her move off the front bench. I don't know if she's having a second child, and it's a very personal thing, but for family reasons Mahuta may also put her hand up to stand aside, rather than stand down.

There are many empty seats (due to retirements) in the middle benches which makes it easy for Goff to reshuffle talent on the backbenches into the middle.

Watch for MPs like Jacinda Ardern, David Shearer, Kelvin Davis, Stuart Nash and Phil Twyford, among others, to pick up new responsibilities.

And that leaves Shane Jones. He's currently out of a job. He is an MP without a single portfolio. That has to change and my sources indicate it will. Jones is too talented to leave idle.

He is running against Pita Sharples in Tamaki Makaurau. Goff must, and I understand will give him a half decent job, a role that helps his profile.

He has done his time. He has paid the price for his midnight movies and munches.

It won't be a massive reshuffle. But my pick is Grant Robertson will be the big winner. Dyson may go down. And there'll be a heap of movement in the middle. And Jones will be back.

Watch out for the announcement later this week.

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

03 Feb 2011 01:50p.m.

David Tune wrote:

@Kim - ha ha - no i'm not a secretary and I know nothing about finance really.
I'm a proud cantabrian.
Didn't know I needed permission to have a view on politics

03 Feb 2011 10:44a.m.

duncan garner wrote:

Cheers David Tune for your views. But seriously to those people who claim I'm a rabid Nat - it's rubbish. To those who say I'm a leftie, it's rubbish. And to the idiot who says I have enjoyed weekends away at John's place, prove it! Go on, put your money where your mouth is. Truth is I have been to Key's place once to interview him about our poll results, I must have been there all of seven minutes. Some of the bullsh*t you guys speak is remarkable, your arguments are intellectually weak. Calling a journo biased is so cliched, it's like calling a red-neck a racist. Come on, surely some of you are smarter than that. Are you?

03 Feb 2011 09:34a.m.

Kim wrote:

@David Tune
I have bben reading Duncans articles reqularly for a couple of years now and i totally disagree with your statement that he is unbiased.
Speaking of unbiased you wouldn't be the David Tune who is the Australian Secretary of the Department of Finance and Deregulation would you??

If so maybe you should stick to your own countries political commentaries

02 Feb 2011 11:04p.m.

David Tune wrote:

From what I've seen of Caygill Jnr he's very impressive.
But given he's now a CEO he'd take some convincing to be an MP.
It's really useful for those of us who are interested in politics but isolated from the 'Wellington-set'
to get your expert analysis from the inside - including things like who are the up-and-comers in each party.
Maybe sometime when you've got the time you could give us a preview of who you think will be the newbies for the main parties after the election?
Even better - who you think should be the new MPs from each party and who you think SHOULD be the new MPs from each.
And for those who accuse you of being pro or anti one party or the other - they should either read more of your stuff and realise you are about the most balanced mainstream journo - you give the all heaps - or otherwise don't bother reading the blog if they've already prejudged you.
Keep up the rigorous and tough analysis!
Keep giving the MPs heaps and letting us in the inside stories!

02 Feb 2011 10:16p.m.

Greg Johnson wrote:

I agree that Conor is an impressive future Labour MP. Don\'t know Caygill - being his father\'s son might not sit well with the current Labour Party? Interesting comment re nanaia mahuta. Isn\'t her sister one of Goff\'s press secs? Given the elevation of Faafoi from press sec to MP, should we expect the younger Mahuta in parliament?

02 Feb 2011 09:37p.m.

Miss Marple wrote:

Duncan Garner is a rabid Nat. End of story. He's obviously hoping to butter up the gormless John Key in the hope of getting a constituency in return. The sooner he gets out of journalism the better, and hopefully someone with a balanced journalistic view will replace him.

02 Feb 2011 07:42p.m.

RobertM wrote:

I would think prospective Health spokesman Grant Robertson would likely stand for mush, intervention, blind support for every specialist and health union claim. Between them Clark, Richardson and Shipley made the intelligent decision to close outdated mental hospitals and it is to expected a lower form of life, the slippery Waitangi negotiator, Christopher Finalyson would be keen to reopen them, to buy a few votes, thru working class bigotry and revenge. There is not any need for them-psychatric problems are caused by psyciatrists percribing high doses for repression and fast results and a general failure to believe the patient rather than their own prejudices or authority.

02 Feb 2011 06:43p.m.

jabba wrote:

actually, I always thought Duncan was a leftie.
anyway, what's the story with Gaffes photo.. dye running??
what has he got to shuffle people, check out the Labour MP's and tell me the positives

02 Feb 2011 12:19p.m.

simon wrote:

more of duncans anti labour rubbish , he works for the national party , all duncan does is regurgitate key @nationals spin . how much key paying ya duncan ? what trips away , weekends at johns we have herd all about it , you guys in the media live of the tax payers just like the mps do . duncan you got any treasure stored up heaven ? .

02 Feb 2011 07:56a.m.

Ruz wrote:

It would be nice if Labour could retire the last remnants of the 1984 Lange Government. That would mean putting Phil Goff and Annette King out to pasture. I agree that Shane Jones needs to come back into the front bench. I have always thought Horomia to be hopeless, in fact if he wasn't Maori he wouldn't be on the front bench.

Duncan Garner's Entries

Previous12345Next