Law change may signal the end of smoko breaks

Print

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 9:32a.m.

Workers will also be given the option to stockpile breaks they have missed, and trade them for a day off

Workers will also be given the option to stockpile breaks they have missed, and trade them for a day off

The Govt has introduced a law change that will allow bosses to withhold workers’ regular breaks – instead paying them for the time, or letting employees trade the breaks for time off later.

National’s bill means regular breaks can be replaced with “compensatory measures”, which include being able to start work late, or leave early.

Workers will also be given the option to stockpile breaks they have missed, and trade them for a day off.

Forms of compensatory measures are not limited by the bill, so employers could pay staff rather than giving breaks.

The bill says there should be “good faith bargaining” between bosses and workers, it gives employers the final say over when and how long breaks will be if agreement cannot be reached, The New Zealand Herald reported.

Labour’s employment spokesman, Trevor Mallard, told the Herald the bill contained downsides for vulnerable workers whose breaks were not protected in collective contracts.

“The idea you could be pushed into taking no breaks at all, and pushed into having them outside work hours is not a good idea,” he says.

“It means the break is worth nothing if it can be replaced with ‘time off’ at the whim of their employer.”

Labour Minister Kate Wilkinson said the changes were aimed at restoring flexibility for employers, by allowing them to time breaks in a way that did not disrupt their businesses.

It is partly aimed at solving problems in workplaces such as sole-charge air traffic control watchtowers.

The Herald reported that while Government departments were consulted, other parties, including Business NZ and the Council of Trade Unions had not been.

The Employers and Manufacturers Association’s employment services manager, David Lowe, said the law change would allow businesses to revert to the more practical custom they had used before last year’s change.

“The current law assumes everyone has a cup of tea at 10am and 3pm, and 30 minutes for lunch at 12 noon,” he told the paper.

CTU president Helen Kelly said last year’s law was flexible enough to cater for different businesses, while giving protection to those most vulnerable.

The new bill replaces the minimum rest break lengths with the more general guideline requiring employers to give workers "a reasonable opportunity ... for rest, refreshment and attending to personal matters".

3 News
 
Council of Trade Unions president Helen Kelly spoke to Sunrise this morning. Watch the video
 

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

02 Nov 2009 03:07p.m.

Donna M wrote:

God another right National is trying to take away from me.

I am an office worker on a computer all day for approx 8-12 hrs a day.
OSH came to our office several years ago, and informed my employer that all computer operators need a 10min micro-pause break every hour. This is to get us away from our computers, allow blood circulation, and allow our eyes to refocus at a different distance.
Now National are telling us, to drop OSH's set requirements, and stop the food breaks that help our brains and body keep functioning at its maximum.
I know that I don't work at my peak in the afternoon if I have not had anything to eat.
We are humans not machines National. Stop trying to fit us all into a square box, when we are all different shapes.

31 Oct 2009 12:48p.m.

dale wrote:

mite have to move to China to get more rights as a worker. thanks National bet you get your breaks

29 Oct 2009 01:03p.m.

Karl wrote:

Nice one - back to the good old days of the early 90s where the employer held all the power & could fire you at a drop of a hat, heading that way again. Why is it (I have children also) that they say children need a break all the time (12wks a year) but us as workers are fine with our 3-4wks & now dictated too about our smoko breaks....Man i should stop working beginning to be not worth it.

28 Oct 2009 10:59p.m.

Dave wrote:

Despite the current regulations, some employers (like mine) dont provide any breaks now, so why the change?

28 Oct 2009 08:41p.m.

jenny wrote:

@matt I 100% agree with you - it's a great time for employers to treat us like shyte!

28 Oct 2009 06:52p.m.

matt wrote:

So now our bosses can hire and fire us within 3 months with no reason or excuse, stop us having breaks,pay school leavers the same minimum wage that an unskilled person who has been in the workforce for many years and is desperate for work! Our government increases our ACC levies while our bosses freeze our pay because of our 'recession' and we wonder why our crime rate is gettin worse.! All take and no give!!!!

28 Oct 2009 06:48p.m.

alena wrote:

i lost one of my jobs and in the final meeting the boss told me it was a health and safty issue that i missed a break and left early

28 Oct 2009 06:43p.m.

hkMike wrote:

Not a bad idea, the way peoples lifestyles are these days, the normal 9-5 doesnt work for them, and then there is is the people who have kids and miss out on there stuff,
I have the sort of job where regular breaks dont always work out so i prefer to work thru lunch and knock off early and beat the traffic or take the extra hours worked, but the boss still cries about having to take lunch because thats the law,But he doesnt say anything when i am working through my breaks
It could be good for some but as usuall you will get the bosses who are Bas###ds and swindle there staff.So the grey fringes will have to be sorted.
so yeah if it can be sorted properly it might work

28 Oct 2009 04:45p.m.

keith wrote:

SICK SOCIETY--- Workers are being ripped to bits and attacked constantly these days.Wait till there is a serious injury accident and the employee has not had his recuperative break [OSH}.I remember in about 1970 at hamilton boys high school ; a scruffy barefoot,greasy long haired mess called James Baxter being allowed to read some poems at morning assembly and even then his poem was about a worker not being allowed "to have time for a 5 minute sh**" and wondering what he was about.Now here it is James.Perhaps you could write a code or card swipe in to the dunny with a onesy or twosy allowance!

28 Oct 2009 11:00a.m.

cyril wrote:

I dont think this will change things much as smoko breaks were bought in because employers found that workers were more efficiant with regular short breaks than working continuously. It wasnt bought in to be kind to employees or because of worker rights as some will have you believe. Well thats what we were taught in school back in the 70s. In this liberal enviroment we live in these days the story has probably changed.