Leaks: Teaching schoolchildren climate change scepticism
Mon, 20 Feb 2012 8:47a.m.
By Seth Borenstein
Leaked documents from a prominent conservative think tank show how it sought to teach schoolchildren scepticism about global warming and planned other behind-the-scenes tactics using millions of dollars in donations from big corporate names.
More than US$14 million of the money used by the Chicago-based Heartland Institute would come from one anonymous man, according to the leaked documents prepared for a meeting of the group's board.
Heartland is one of the loudest voices denying man-made global warming, hosting the largest international scientific conference of sceptics on climate change. Several of its documents were leaked this week to the news media, showing the planning and money behind its efforts. Heartland said some of the documents weren't accurate, but declined to be more specific.
As detailed in the papers, Heartland's plans for this year included paying an Energy Department consultant $100,000 to design a curriculum to teach school children that mainstream global warming science is in dispute, even though it's a fact accepted by the federal government and nearly every scientific professional organization. It also pays prominent global warming sceptics more than $300,000 a year and plans to raise $88,000 to help a former television weatherman set up a new temperature records website.
"The stolen documents appear to have been written by Heartland's president for a board meeting that took place on January 17," Heartland said in a statement. "The authenticity of those documents has not been confirmed." The institute singled out one of the six documents - claiming to be a summary of efforts on the issue of global warming - as a fake.
Because Heartland was not specific about what was fake and what was real, The Associated Press attempted to verify independently key parts of separate budget and fundraising documents that were leaked. The federal consultant working on the classroom curriculum, the former TV weatherman, a Chicago elected official who campaigns against hidden local debt and two corporate donors all confirmed to the AP that the sections in the document that pertained to them were accurate. No one the AP contacted said the budget or fundraising documents mentioning them were incorrect.
David Wojick, a Virginia-based federal database contractor, said in an email that the document was accurate about his project to put curriculum materials in schools that promote climate scepticism.
"My goal is to help them teach one of the greatest scientific debates in history," Wojick said. "This means teaching both sides of the science, more science, not less."
Five government and university climate scientists contacted said they were most disturbed by Wojick's project, fearing the teaching would be more propaganda rooted in politics than peer-reviewed science.
Businesses and other interests often offer free curriculum materials to financially strapped schools, hoping that teachers will use them and help disseminate their views or promote their products.
Energy Department spokeswoman Jen Stutsman said Wojick's federal work has nothing to do with climate change and that the agency maintains that global warming is real and manmade.
Heartland also planned to spend $210,000 to help Cook County Treasurer Maria Pappas tour the nation to speak about municipal debt, according to one document. Pappas lost to Barack Obama in the 2004 Democratic primary for a US Senate seat. Pappas confirmed this in a phone interview, saying what Heartland was doing was exposing a "financial tsunami" of municipal debt.
The leaked document also discusses a new million-dollar Heartland initiative to promote the ability of patients to use experimental drugs that have not yet received federal safety approval, and efforts to support embattled Wisconsin Republican leaders in "Operation Angry Badger". Those parts of the documents were not independently confirmed.
The documents also show Heartland has raised more than $2 million from large insurance companies and nearly half a million dollars from tobacco interests.
A person who emailed 15 media and bloggers as "Heartland insider" sent six different documents purporting to be from the libertarian think tank. The insider then killed the email account used to send the documents and could not be reached. Heartland spokesman Jim Lakely would not confirm or deny the claims made in the five documents that he did not call fake.
The most sensational parts of the documents - and much of what has been confirmed independently - had to do with global warming and efforts to spread doubt into what mainstream scientists are saying. Experts long have thought Heartland and other groups were working to muddy the waters about global warming, said Harry Lambright, a Syracuse University public policy professor who specializes in environment, science and technology issues.
"Scientifically there is no controversy. Politically, there is a controversy because there are political interest groups making it a controversy," Lambright said. "It's not about science. It's about politics. To some extent they are winning the battle."
A 2010 study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences surveyed more than 1,300 most cited and published climate scientists and found that 97 percent of them said climate change was a man-made problem. Yet, public opinion polls show far more doubt in the American public.
An environmental advocacy group, Forecast the Facts, on Thursday started a petition and social media campaign to complain to two of Heartland's corporate donors listed on the documents, Microsoft and General Motors. The two were not the biggest donors; Microsoft donated $69,000 over three years, while the General Motors Foundation gave $45,000. But those are companies that "need to hear from their customers" that they are not happy about promoting climate scepticism, especially after General Motors got a government bailout, campaign director Daniel Souweine said.
General Motors spokesman Greg Martin said the company's foundation gives money to "a variety of different groups holding a variety of opinions". Microsoft said through its public relations agency that it donates software to 44,000 nonprofits that pass IRS standards, as Heartland does, and that it considers climate change a serious issue.
The documents showed how heavily Heartland relies on a single person it identified only as "Anonymous Donor." In the past six years, the man has given $14.26 million to the institute, nearly half its $33.9 million in revenue.
[Article uses US dollars]
Post a Comment
Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide
(Won't be published)
21/02/2012 10:37:53 a.m.
Pseudo science has no place in the classroom. Any teachings that global climate change is not real belongs in the trash bin. Not a classroom. The science behind climate change has been proven time and time again.. Its a proven fact that humans produce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in 3 - 5 days than volcanic eruptions contribute in a year. Its a proven fact that human induced carbon dioxide levels are higher in 2012 than any other time in earths history. any information that tries to claim otherwise is not real science. so has no place in the classroom.
21/02/2012 6:06:29 a.m.
Bob Armstrong wrote:
That children matriculate from elementary school fearing the molecule upon which life , every bite of food they eat , and therefore , indeed , they themselves are constructed , something has gone criminally wrong with the teaching of science . Be thankful that with a puny budget measured in the hundredths of the global statist fraudsters , Heartland is working to offer a supplemental solid basic science curriculum .
20/02/2012 11:15:51 p.m.
LOl the business cronies come flocking in to shout "Global warming isnt proven".... but why? because they dont want to pay compliance costs to fix the mess they are making of the environment.
As intelligent thinking people we know global warming is real.... at no time in history have carbon dioxide levels been as high or damaging as they have been in the last century... more carbon dioxide causes warmer temperatures.
Where does the pollution come from? primarily corporate giants with their giant smoke stacks, or dumping from industrial plants or farms into the water ways.
So what will business do to stop this becoming acceptable knowledge? hire P.R firms to get people like Daniel to post? or perhaps Daniel is a farmer or a corporate businessman? he most certainly isnt much of a thinker.
Trees produce oxygen... we now have far less of them and there are now close to 7 Billion of us... and we each breath out carbon dioxide, corporate plants however pump billions of tonnes of it into the atmospher yearly.
SO more carbon dioxide added to less oxygen as the vegetation on the planet decreases... thats a recipe for global warming.
But Business doesnt want compliance costs.... they dont want to be held accountable for their mess.
So they buy the people they need to say what they need them to say.
I have found that those who dont believe in global warming are generally heavy polluters who fair increased compliance costs.
20/02/2012 8:29:31 p.m.
Even Greenpeace discovered evidence that contradicted the theory of global warming, they refused to publish it because it would hurt their donations. Greenpeace are as corrupt as the big oil corporations. The fact is, Global warming isn't 100% proven, and if there is evidence that questions it we should have access to it so we have the opportunity to make an unbiased decision on what we believe.
20/02/2012 8:28:01 p.m.
Sounds exactly like the manipulation John Key would use... he did afterall manage to convince Kiwis that giving the rich a tax cut was a good idea at a time that the country was and still is bleeding money.
And as a Businessman he hates the idea of Global Warming being accepted as it would cost corporations and large business'es billions to clean up their act... which is why they spend millions on misinformation programmes.
The tobacco and alcohol companies did this for decades.... smoking and drinking were portrayed as cool and hip for many decades.
So major polluters will pour hundreds of millions of dollars into misinformation programmes... and the biggest criminals are the ones denouncing global warming.
And the one thing John Key isnt focused on is bringing the biggest criminals in society to justice... the rich, the wealthy and the large corporations that contributed so heavily to his relection campaign.
Politics isnt about doing the right thing anymore... its about who has the most money behind them.
20/02/2012 5:27:40 p.m.
There are only two sides to a story when neither side has been proven. Global Warming/Climate Change is a fact that has been proven time and time again by the most well respected, educated scientists in the world. The ones that claim there are two sides are the ones that insist on ignoring the science so this "curriculum" that conservatives plan on sneaking into schools is indoctrination. An indoctrination that will ultimately benefit the oil & gas industry. Something all the bought off conservative politicians and so-called skeptic scientists will be happy about.
20/02/2012 4:53:10 p.m.
The opposing arguments have always been publicly suppressed therefore almost all kids have been indoctrinated into the official view. There are far more highly educated skeptics from significant organisations than they would have you believe. The funding for the opposing side is a drop in a bucket compared to the pro side but they never mention that.
20/02/2012 3:29:21 p.m.
Healthy scepticism never hurt anyone. The main thing is to not indoctrinate with one side of an argument only. Kids should be always taught to challenge - and how to research to draw conclusions - whether "right" or "wrong". It is certain that neither side of the current debate will be alive to say "I told you so".
20/02/2012 2:29:13 p.m.
It always amusing to hear from such organisations as, Heartland. Their confusion and ignorance shines like a beacon. The only people or organisations that refer to "Global Climate warming". simply do not understand the science and so choose to ignore the, Facts. The proper term is: Global Climate Change. the difference in terminology is important in understanding the science and accepting, the global climate is changing, and is MAN induced.
20/02/2012 1:11:30 p.m.
Apart from the backers what is wrong with teaching both sides of this.
There are two sides and both should be looked at not just the one the media wishes to promote.
A stranded orca has been rescued from the Kaipara Harbour after commercial fishermen noticed it stuck on a sandbank.
Earlier this month a group of friends decided they wanted to see the great outdoors and raise a bit of awareness about the environment.
A 15-year-old school student has developed a new test that could detect cancerous tumours before they become too advanced to treat.
The sweet smell of rubbish has caused problems for police in Los Angeles after a black bear caught a whiff.
Super tornadoes are likely to happen more often as the world warms, according to NIWA.
Copyright © 2013 MediaWorks TV. All Rights Reserved.