3News » Home
Full Story

Leaky homes bill estimated at $11.3 billion

3 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA

Tue, 22 Dec 2009 7:59p.m.
The Government is promising to help people repair leaky homes after a shock report revealed nearly 90,000 properties could be affected and said the estimated cost of fixing them was a staggering $11.3 billion.

Building and Construction Minister Maurice Williamson released the report today and said the damage was much greater than anyone had previously wanted to acknowledge.

"This leaves thousands of New Zealanders in a terrible position," he said.

"They may not be able to borrow the money to repair their homes, or to sell them, so their single most important asset is decaying in front of their eyes."

The previous government struggled with the problem, and Mr Williamson said the blame game had been played for too long.

"Now it's time to act. That's why the government is bringing together a package as a priority to help affected homeowners repair their homes and move on."

Mr Williamson commissioned the PricewaterhouseCoopers report, which estimates that between 22,000 and 89,000 homes could be affected.

Only about 3500 had been repaired to date and about 9000 were now beyond the 10-year legal liability limit.

Basing its cost estimate on 42,000 "failures" the report says the total cost of fixing them is $11.3b.

The previous government held an inquiry into leaky homes, which concluded the problems were caused by shoddy materials, poor building and inadequate inspection procedures.

It set up a resolution process, which became bogged down in litigation and delays. Many homeowners gave up hope of ever being able to recoup their losses.

The report focused on homes built between 1992 and 2008, It said failure rates since 2006, when regulations were changed, appeared to be much lower than in previous years.

The report said that under current policy, repair costs were distributed on the basis of 69 percent to the owner, 25 percent to councils, 4 percent to third parties and 2 percent to the Government.

Mr Williamson said he commissioned the report because he wanted to know the real extent of the problem so the Government knew how to respond to it.

He gave no details of the rescue package, saying only that it would be brought together "as a priority".

NZPA
Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [3]

Phil
23 Dec 2009 1:16p.m.

Why should the tax payer pay the bill for leaky homes. Its a disgrace.

Yes, National deregulated the building industry, scrapped apprenticeships and created the environment for this to happen.

Now, they are using our money, telling us to tighten our belts to get them out of the poo.

Warren Matthews
22 Dec 2009 10:44p.m.

Quote: "Well done Maurice 22 Dec 2009 9:38p.m. For still doing barely anything even..." Thank you for posting historical information such as this, lest we forget. The National = Labour politics aside, as a Tax Payer, who has avoided housing as an 'investment' I would just like to voice my resistance to any suggestion of my money being used to fund these peoples 'mistakes'. I understand that they may have been conned and didn't know but there needs to be repercussions for their hasty decisions. I am hoping there are others like me out there, who currently cannot afford and do not own a house due to the influx of monopoly money raising them to values far beyond what the house is actually worth. May I encourage those of you, like me, to resist any suggestion of a Tax Payer funded bail out, as that is our money too. However, good luck to those unfortunates in any court actions taken against the swindlers (banks, builders or politicians).

Well done Maurice
22 Dec 2009 9:38p.m.

For still doing barely anything even though National caused this by deregulating the building industry in the 1990's letting builders cheat on costs and workmanship.

So how much is National going to pay of the 11.3 billion dollars in damage that it caused?

Would have to say.. betting on not much of anything.

But then again, perhaps that what the ACC hikes were all about.

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio