Libya: NATO want to 'avoid Iraq scenario'

Print

Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:20a.m.

Moammar Gadhafi (Reuters)

Moammar Gadhafi (Reuters)

Libyan rebels have entered Tripoli and are making their way to the city centre in what Otago University Professor of International Relations Robert Patman says could become “a grand battle for Tripoli”.

Mr Patman joined Firstline this morning to discuss the situation in Libya – where to next for the country, and why Moammar Gadhafi hasn’t yet backed down.

Colonel Gadhafi has so far refused to concede defeat, something Mr Patman says is in keeping with his behaviour throughout the rebellion.

“It may be more of the sort of delusionary behaviour that Gadhafi has demonstrated throughout this crisis – he never really seriously seemed to have entertained an exit from this situation,” he says.

Mr Patman says Gadhafi’s refusal to back down is “a strength and weakness” and may be in part an attempt to reduce any wavering among his supporters.

“I suppose he’s hoping to rally his loyalists in Libya and quite frankly, when a regime depends so much on one person… if the person at the top is seen to lose their nerve you can have a quick collapse.”

If the regime does collapse Mr Patman says NATO will want to avoid “a sort of Iraq scenario” where the sudden change inspires ongoing fighting for control of the country.

“They don’t want a situation where there’s a power vacuum and brutal infighting and revenge killings,” he says.

“There are reports that NATO chiefs have been in close discussions with the rebels to try and make sure there’s no revenge killings and that there’s a relatively smooth transition.”

Watch the video for the full interview

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

22 Aug 2011 12:17p.m.

Matt wrote:

The enemy gets a vote too. We had them all in a quadrant with Tripoli encircled, now they have faded away into the population. That is not good, we could have cut a deal with them instead of having an insurgency and then cutting a deal for a Sunni type awakening. It was way to easy and there was no resistance. Now if they want to start a civil war they kill people from one tribe, then from another tribe and start a sectarian war and exploit the vacuum, simple as, then the Rebel army will eat itself from the inside out, east versus west civil war.