• Full Story

List of rejected baby names released

Print

Fri, 06 Jan 2012 11:29a.m.

350 names were rejected in the 10 years ending June 30, 2011

350 names were rejected in the 10 years ending June 30, 2011

Numerous royal titles, religious references and punctuation marks were among the children’s names rejected over the past decade.

Justice was the most popular disallowed name, followed by Princess, King, Prince and Royal.

A child and family psychologist told Fairfax Media she had even seen children named after illicit drugs and warned parents should be more careful about stigmatising them.

An Internal Affairs Department report shows 350 names were rejected in the 10 years ending June 30, 2011.

Forty-nine people tried to name their child Justice, along with alternate spellings Juztice and Justus, Fairfax Media reported.

Religious references Messiah, Christ, Bishop, Saint and Lucifer were also rejected, along with Mafia No Fear, Anal, V8, single letters, Roman numerals and punctuation symbols.

Names cannot be banned, however the Internal Affairs Department says they have to fall within the bounds of the law; they can be no more than 100 characters, use an unearned title, or be offensive to the general public.

"A name can be rejected if it might cause offense to a reasonable person, or if it is, includes or resembles an official rank or title, or if it is unreasonably long. So, one couldn't, for example, register a swear word as a name for their child or couldn't, without adequate justification, register a name of Justice, Colonel or Royal,” says deputy registrar-general Ross McPherson.

The rejected names list follows the release of the most popular names for 2011 – Liam and Ruby – earlier this week.

Top 10 rejected names (July 1, 2001 to June 30,2011)

  1. Justice (49 rejections)
  2. Princess (24 rejections)
  3. King (21 rejections)
  4. Prince (20 rejections)
  5. Royal (12 rejections)
  6. Duke (7 rejections)
  7. Bishop (7 rejections)
  8. Major (6 rejections)
  9. J (6 rejections)
  10. Lucifer (6 rejections)

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments

28 Mar 2012 01:00p.m.

Erm... wrote:

If someone wants to call their child Anal the child should be taken into care.

06 Jan 2012 06:31p.m.

Kim wrote:

Princess, king, prince, and royal are NOT earned titles so should be allowed.

06 Jan 2012 03:24p.m.

pondering wrote:

Ok so I can see that a line needs to be drawn on the submitting a heinous grievous name on child. But where and who draws that line. In many countries religious names like Jesus and its various other forms like Joshua have mass popularity. Saint (xxx) is still common amoung certain circles of nobility and affluence. Gay and Dick come and go . Names that may seem poor taste or outrageously alternative to some may be a strike for individuality or expression of hope and aspiration to another. Internal affairs looks to be run by Hitlers that are inconsistent and arbitrary. A better guideline would be If Babara Cartland wouldn't use it in one of her novels then you can't use it either.

06 Jan 2012 02:43p.m.

Wondering wrote:

I am wondering if there is no Justice. There are quite a few little and medium sized Justices wandering around out there. It appears to be popular in the vein of the Grace names used in the 18th century presently having a resurgence. Faith , Hope, Charity, Amity, Honour and Peace are all dominating the school play ground. While there are names that are just plain offensive and babies need rescuing from, it should not be completely up to the whim of the registry office worker what is acceptable and what is not. Save the condemnation for the truly awful and unjust.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)