• Full Story

Local body results no indication for national election

Print

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 3:07p.m.

Experts say John Key has no cause for concern following local body elections

Experts say John Key has no cause for concern following local body elections

By Amelia Langford

The election of left-leaning mayors in several cities does not mean Prime Minister John Key should start panicking, some political experts say.

"I think too much has been made of the 'should John Key be making his retirement plans?' - I think that's nonsense," Massey University local government expert Andy Asquith told NZPA.

He did not think the local body elections results could be used as a crystal ball to predict the general election result - "not in a million years".

Wellington's mayor-elect Celia Wade-Brown, a member of the Green Party, beat three-term mayor Kerry Prendergast by 176 votes after being behind by 40 votes on election day. She campaigned on environmental issues and supports having light rail in Wellington by 2020.

Her win followed left-leaning Len Brown's election as Auckland super city leader and in Dunedin victory to former television presenter David Cull - who is also considered to be a bit of a leftie.

Mr Asquith said New Plymouth's election of former Labour Party MP Harry Duynhoven might also be seen as part of the "left-wing tide".

However, he did not think the country's local body election results signalled any clear trend.

"People are jumping up and down about a leftward shift but I don't actually buy into that. I just think its local events that have shaped things," he said.

In Dunedin, issues about the controversial stadium and the level of debt shaped the election, he said.

In Wellington he put Ms Wade-Brown's victory down to her rival's "lacklustre" campaign.

"I don't think she won because she was green, I think she won because she wasn't Kerry Prendergast," he said.

He noted Ms Prendergast had blamed STV (single transferable voting) for her defeat.

"But it was the electoral system that was used last time and she won. It was the electoral system that she knew would be used when she entered the game," he said.

Mr Asquith added he was disappointed by low voter turnout around the country, which was a "sad state for local democracy".

It was great that 52 percent of people in Auckland had voted but that also meant 48 percent hadn't.

"I think in Auckland it was down to the fact that the centre-right didn't mobilise their supporters," he said.

Auckland city mayor John Banks had spent three years reinventing his image, but voters were too "sophisticated" to be taken in, he said.

Auckland University's political studies research fellow Graham Bush also dismissed the idea of a clear trend emerging in the wake of the local elections.

"I know the media want to brand elections as moving left or right or not moving at all [but] having studied local elections for many decades I would be a bit more circumspect than that," he said.

Local elections did not appear to be any predictor of how people would vote in general elections, Dr Bush said.

The only time he had spotted such a trend was after the 1974 local body elections, where a swing to the right was followed by National's victory, led by Robert Muldoon, in the 1975 general election.

However Otago University's Bryce Edwards, who specialises in New Zealand politics, said he noticed several other clear trends.

"There wasn't a lot of real discussion on policy or policy promises - it was all mainly about platitudes and managerial politics - 'I will do this better than the other candidate'," Dr Edwards said.

It reflected a general shift in New Zealand politics: "Ideology is out and personalities are in".

People no longer stood on a "party political ticket", such as Ms Wade-Brown who stood as an independent despite being a Green Party member.

"I'm not sure if I entirely approve of these very party political people pretending not to be party political. I don't really think it's that admirable," he said.

But Ms Prendergast's fall from grace came down to voter fatigue, he said.

"People were tired of her face, there's some similarities there with the fall of the Helen Clark Labour Government," Dr Edwards said.

Dr Edwards has also noticed an increase in "negative politics".

"Mostly local body elections are fairly tame affairs where everyone gets on quite well but it strikes me there is a bit more negative campaigning," he said.

In Invercargill, for example, there had been some "quite nasty stuff going on" between incumbent Tim Shadbolt and Suzanne Prentice: "There were quite a lot of rumours being spread and allegations being made. Some people found that quite distasteful."

Mr Banks and Mr Brown also tried to undercut their rivals during campaigning, he said.

He was undecided as to whether local elections results could be any predictor of general elections.

"The fact that [Mr] Brown won in Auckland - I think it will be a worry for the Government...

"It's kind of like the canary in the mine, Auckland does tend to favour parties that become more popular in the future."

NZPA

 

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

16 Oct 2010 10:52a.m.

adell wrote:

I have to congrateulate Mr Brown for being elected to the Mayor seat for the Big City scheem very dissapointing for John Banks and John Keys who planned on not having Mr Brown in the running even. anyway it is Mr Brown that will be minding the value and beliefs of whanau in all its compleities to aim for their wellness, he has done a great job with Manukau and he will do the same for the rest of the city. I do beleive he will not be easy influenced by National Govt as well. Yes I agree John Keys dose need to plan his retierment, and with that note prior to John Keys being elected he stated very clearly that he did not need money and that he would give his wages to carity, may I ask who that lucky charity was???????curious.

16 Oct 2010 12:50a.m.

V wrote:

Worse than that, Selling NZ to the Globalists, preparing your savings for theft, Arming the police in case you revolt, Its happening everywhere in the world.

15 Oct 2010 11:43p.m.

Jonathon wrote:

People are beginning to realise that they have been ripped off by National.
Early childcare services have become dangerous.. with many childcare centres.. particularly Kidicorp centres relying on relievers to bolster a severe lack of staff.

Public transport costs in Auckland and Wellington have increased... not by the proposed 2.25 percent.. but between 15-50 percent as the National party introduces more and more user pays charges on services.

Beneficiaries reliant on public transport now find that the 2 percent increase they were given in their benefit has been taken away from them on transport costs alone.. with nothing left over for the increase in power, rent, phone or anything else.

The National party are full of scum bag liars.

15 Oct 2010 09:56p.m.

ann wrote:

HES GOT TO SAY THAT . ps mr key better hope hes right . they have destroyed the economy national have . recession that gets worse , no answers and zero growth , well done mr key and national well done what winners you lot are arnt you. money bags couldent care less.

15 Oct 2010 08:18p.m.

Lightseed wrote:

People don't tend to vote on party lines in a local election, that is why John Banks was elected in the first term of Labours Government. People weren't sick of Labour and went on to re-elect them. I actually couldn't tell you if who i voted for in local elections supported which national parties.

15 Oct 2010 03:55p.m.

RON wrote:

There is a swing to the left people are not happy with national