• Full Story

Man banned for moko won't return to bar

Print

Wed, 05 Oct 2011 6:17a.m.

Tunahau Kohu was ejected from the Turf Bar

Tunahau Kohu was ejected from the Turf Bar

A man who was asked to leave a Christchurch bar because of his moko says he won't be going back despite an apology from its owners.

Tunahau Kohu, a mental health worker with Ngai Te Rangi links, was ejected from the Turf Bar, formerly the Parklands Tavern, on Saturday.

Manager Allan Forsdick says the establishment's new dress code bans face or neck tattoos and insists "it is not a racial issue."

Mr Forsdick alleges that Mr Kohu became aggressive when asked to go, causing several customers to leave, The Press reports.

"People do (get neck and facial tattoos) for intimidating reasons most of the time," Forsdick says.

Mr Kohu has full facial ta moko, a traditional Maori tattoo that connects wearers to their whakapapa.

He says he had bought a drink, played the gaming machines then sat down to watch Australia play Russia in a Rugby World Cup match with his partner when he was asked to leave.

"I tried to explain that my moko isn't a facial tattoo. Every line and spiral has a meaning to it," he told The Press.

"They said if I didn't leave, they would ring the police. They weren't interested in my explanation of what it meant."

He says calling a moko a tattoo is offensive and while he shook hands with the manager on Tuesday, he is angry and won't be heading back in a hurry.

"I don't think he deserved my handshake. I wish I didn't give it now," Mr Kohu says.

Bars are entitled to eject anyone as long as it was not based on ethnicity, gender or disability.

NZN

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

08 Nov 2011 12:06a.m.

Andy Brown wrote:

I'd ask people to answer this question truthfully to themselves: Let's say you'd never heard of Mr Kohu (who clearly is a very nice gentleman). If he happened to knock your door one night and asked to use your phone, would you feel more willing to do so if he wasn't wearing a moko? Personally, I would feel more receptive if he didn't have a moko. There are two reasons. One: I've never met anyone with a full-face moko, so on the rare occasion I see them on TV etc they appear intimidating. Two: I tend to associate people who have extensive tattoos, and especially tattoos on the face, with criminal elements. Now that I have seen him on TV, I would certainly let him use my phone if he needed it. But if he had knocked on my door a week or two ago there's no way I would have let him in, just as I wouldn't let in a bald white guy with facial piercings and "SS" or "White Power" tattooed on his arm. I'd feel I was putting my family and myself in danger if I let either one in. You can call me ignorant or a gutless wonder for feeling that way but you can't put it down to racism, it's not. I can understand how the staff at the bar could have looked at Mr Kohu and thought "oh-oh, he looks like trouble". Unfortunately people do tend to judge a book by its cover and when many people first see him they will think "gang member". I appreciate the moko's cultural significance but it really can make some non-Maori people, who aren't in the slightest bit racist, feel extremely apprehensive.

15 Oct 2011 01:37a.m.

Gaz wrote:

Well, this is an interesting one, My first thoughts were- you tattoo your face! you look like a thug therefore you get treated like one. But this guy "appears" to be a genuine nice guy who has simply put his beliefs out in public on his face! Unfortunately 99% of facial tattoo's are definately worn by scum bags who think they are above the law and have no place in society, This is a tricky case and i have pity for both the bar staff and the patron. Definately "seems" like a nice guy, but looks like a gang member!!

12 Oct 2011 04:26a.m.

Kasanita wrote:

I know quite a number of very educated, upstanding citizens here in the USA & Australia who have tattoos on/near/around the neck and they're respectable people. This incident, all things considered, sounds a lot like racial profiling and cultural discrimination. My observation is the exact flipside of the pub owner's very narrow minded view of the world at large. How can he generalize that way and call it fair? Called his own bluff he did! It seems the pub owner and his staff need to travel the world a little, it might help enlighten and educate their mediocre minds.

10 Oct 2011 09:51p.m.

Erena wrote:

Totally wrong, But on the other hand I guess you get a tattoo because you are NOT comfortable in your skin. It wasnt painstakingly done with stone chisels and traditional dyes as befits a warrior, but obviously in a modern tattoo parlor by machine, so its nothing to do with his cultural traditions. Just read the dress code man!

06 Oct 2011 11:25a.m.

Teri wrote:

This is "Absolutely disgusting" Racism at it absolute worst, but the saddest part is this is in our own country. Racism against our own indigenous culture! I would totally understand if the tattoo was gang related and intimidating. But if you live in NZ (Aotearoa) you should NO these things. With the RWC on you would think the people of NZ would pay a little more attention to Maori and our people and the way we do things.This is so upsetting, Mr Tunahau Kohu had been treated this way, in his own country. I wonder if they ask other races that wear vails covering their faces to leave when in their bar! I bet not! When is this crap going to stop. A moko which is a very distinctive tattoo, you can not mistaken for anything other than what it is. The persons Whakapapa and geneology. I would say these bar owners should know these things. You can't tell me if you are from NZ you don't know this. The moko is everywhere OPEN YOUR EYES!!

05 Oct 2011 10:40p.m.

Mista wrote:

A man simply wears moko with mana,with pride! In repect of his ancestral backround & heritage,every design holds a destintive meaning. not at any given moment does a man wear it to intimidate anyone.in no-way shape or form does a moko fall into the same category as if a white man were to tattoo his face.to them its decoration,a moko is part of culture.some of you idiots out there fail to recognise that.

05 Oct 2011 05:41p.m.

Wills wrote:

Some say the ta moko is intimidating, others say it should be kept within Maoridom and is not part of their (white) culture, but the fact is that a lot of white peole are wearing them these days.

05 Oct 2011 04:33p.m.

Michele wrote:

Oh Christchurch. Remember that wonderful man who started lifting concrete boulders to help people get out of the rubble after the Earthquake? I wonder if he'd have been 'banned' if he had a moko. Actions speak louder than words - and mokos. We need to learn to start judging people on those alone. I think it's safe to say who is being 'judged' as the better person in this case.

05 Oct 2011 01:33p.m.

Jack wrote:

I will be patronising this bar because their decision was not racially motivated, they were simply adhering to their dress code. I think establishments do need dress codes, and good on them for sticking to it. The bar owner and staff do not deserve the racist comments and slurs or criticisms aimed at them.

05 Oct 2011 12:48p.m.

Judy wrote:

This is stereotyping of the very worst sort, in New Zealand for God's sake, and despite its apology the bar should be taken to the Race Relations Conciliator. Also, I have a real problem with a bar being able to withhold service from ANYONE with neck or facial tattoos and I'm not too keen on the dress code either. This was once the country where everyone was equal. Age, behaviour and intoxication should be the only legal barriers to admission to any licensed premises and people who hold liquor licenses should start viewing them as the privelege they are.