• Full Story

Man caught in crossfire will sue police

Print

Sun, 20 Feb 2011 10:01a.m.

Halatau Naitoko was farewelled on January 30, 2009 (NZPA, file)

Halatau Naitoko was farewelled on January 30, 2009 (NZPA, file)

A man caught up in a shootout between police and a man on a crime rampage, in which an innocent man was fatally shot, is suing police.

Richard Neville is suing the force for gross negligence and mental trauma after the incident on Auckland's northwestern motorway in 2009, the New Zealand Herald reported today.

Courier driver Halatau Naitoko was killed in crossfire by a police marksman during the shootout with Stephen Hohepa McDonald.

Mr Neville was also hit by shots fired by police and said he was left with about 200 lead and copper fragments in his left arm and upper chest.

The 42-year-old said he felt he had no choice but to take a civil case against the police and papers will be lodged in the High Court at Auckland next month.

His lawyer, Nicholas Taylor said Mr Neville was also considering laying criminal charges against the officer who harmed him.

A spokesman for Police Minister Judith Collins said it was inappropriate to comment if there was pending legal action. Police National Headquarters would not comment while matters were before a coroner.

Mr Neville said the injuries had impacted heavily on his quality of life. He also felt the officer who shot him should "man up" and apologise.

He said the bullet caused blood clots in his ears and now has to wear hearing aids.

He has trouble sleeping, his arm is too damaged for him to return to his career as an artist and blacksmith and he's consulted psychologists over the trauma.

There was also a concern about any poisoning he might still suffer from, from the metal still stuck in his arm and were too close to nerves for surgeons be able to retrieve.

"The hand surgeon said I look like a banana cake, full of black seeds."

NZPA

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

03 Apr 2012 01:14p.m.

Ricardo wrote:

Sorry guys, I agree with Cyril. If any of my friends or family were "accidentally" killed by police who were bad shots then I would be raising hell, as I suspect you all would. The rules of shooting have never changed - no clear shot - then don't take the shot. No excuses.

24 Feb 2011 06:03a.m.

Idiot cyril wrote:

u idiot cryil, the police have half a second to make the best decison they can to save lives. if they didnt open fire and he died they would have to face legal action against the police why they didnt fire. I hope you get put in that position and the police arnt there lets see how u deal with an armed crimal.

20 Feb 2011 05:12p.m.

Nathan wrote:

I thought that's what we had ACC for.
I presume he'll be taking in the standard 80% of his artist/blacksmith wage.

20 Feb 2011 05:10p.m.

JJH wrote:

Good one Cyril. You're obviously an Olympic shooter - very skilled at hitting static paper targets.
Unfortunately the Police don't have the leisure of spending hours assessing situations before intervening. Incidents are constantly changing, and therefore need to be reassessed constantly.
Unlike a recreational shooter, the decision of Police to refrain from pulling the trigger can also have lethal consequences.
It's so easy to second-guess an operation from an armchair, isn't it? You'll always be a champion.

20 Feb 2011 11:54a.m.

cyril wrote:

Yeah if the fools want to arm the police then they should teach them the gun laws and how to shoot as there record of one shot hits let alone kills is appalling. If they were recreational shooters they would have there gun licences taken off them and be banned from firearms use for life.