• Full Story

Mana releases 'economic justice' policy

Print

Thu, 27 Oct 2011 2:05p.m.

John Minto explains the rise in inequality

John Minto explains the rise in inequality

By Dan Satherley

With the Occupy Auckland camp as a backdrop, the Mana Party this morning took to Aotea Square to unveil what they're calling their "economic justice" policy.

Spokesperson John Minto, who is standing for Mana in the Manukau East electorate, says New Zealand has had the fastest growth in inequality in the OECD over the last few decades.

To fix this, Mana is proposing to get rid of GST, instantly raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour and make the first $27,000 of income tax-free.

The minimum wage later be pegged at two-thirds of the average wage, so would jump to around $16.50 by 2013.

"We no longer have the situation where low wages are low, and keep on failing to meet the rate of inflation and people get further into poverty," says Mr Minto.

The tax-free threshold – $27,000 – equates to what a person working 40 hours a week on the minimum wage would earn.

Mr Minto says GST has to go because it is "inequitable", and hits the poor disproportionately hard.

"We're not talking about taking GST off fresh fruit and vegetables, we're saying get rid of it altogether," says Mr Minto. "It is a tax on the poor – the poor pay about 13 percent of their income on GST, the wealthy pay about 5 percent of GST on their income… it has to go."

Mr Minto says getting rid of GST would cost $15 billion, which would be recouped through a tax on financial transactions known overseas as the 'Robin Hood tax' and locally, as the 'Hone Heke tax'.

He says taxing speculation on the dollar, for example, would also have the added advantage of stabilising the currency and would bring down the overvalued dollar.

"If the value of our dollar goes down through a tax on speculating, it means our exporters will get greater income from their exports – it's a win-win-win situation," says Mr Minto.

Mr Minto says he's not sure yet what the tax would be, except it would "zero point something of a percentage – very low".

"It's a tax on the 1 percent to relieve the pressure on the 99 percent who are paying all of the tax at the moment."

The separation of people into the '1 percent' and the '99 percent' is an idea lifted directly from the international Occupy movement, but local occupiers seemed disinterested in Mana's announcement. Only a couple bothered to leave the camp to watch Mr Minto speak.

One occupier told 3 News that as a political party, Mana was a part of the problem, not the solution, and couldn't be trusted.

Another detail of the party's economic policy announced today was a simplified progressive taxation system, where all a person's income is counted, no matter its source.

"We have a lot of unearned income which is not taxed at all," says Mr Minto, pointing to capital gains, shares and hidden trusts.

"It is dead simple," says Mr Minto. "All of your income in one pool, and that is taxed at your personal tax rate."

According to Mana's calculations, minimum wage workers would get an instant in-the-hand payrise of $132, rising to $200 once the minimum wage was pegged to the average.

They are realistic, however, on their chances of implementing their economic plans.

"We're not planning to control the Government after the election," says Mr Minto, "but we're planning to have a major influence in the next Parliament, and these ideas we will be fighting very hard for."

He showed a series of charts showing how since the early 1980s, New Zealand wages have stagnated compared to Australia and places the blame for this – and growing inequality – on both the major parties.

"Labour and National policies over the last 27 years have been captured by the 1 percent," he told the crowd. "That 1 percent in NZ has become obscenely wealthy while we have hundreds of thousands of kids living in poverty. We need a dramatic and revolutionary change in our economic approach, and that is provided by Mana."

Party leader Hone Harawira was also present, but took a low profile and didn't address the media.

Other policies announced today:

  • Give workers greater bargaining powers to negotiate wages and conditions
  • Extend in-work tax credits to beneficiaries
  • Regulate loan sharks and restrict banks' profits on loans, credit cards and mortgages
  • Regulate family trusts and other 'tax-avoidance' devices

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

30 Oct 2011 11:47a.m.

percyd wrote:

Some sensible stuff in amongst some very dodgy calcs (e.g. the tax effect for minimum wage earners). Tobin Tax (and very quickly drop the "Hone Heke" nonsense if you want to be taken seriously) is coming, never fear. GST should stay and be tiered: 0% on food, power, rates and selected necessities), 15% on basics and 25%+ on luxury/'bad' stuff (gas guzzlers, jewellery and so on.)

28 Oct 2011 03:27p.m.

Seamus wrote:

Great! Let's scrap GST and encourage more consumption.If there's one thing NZ needs more of, it's debt funded consumer spending! Pegging the minimum wage to the average wage (rather than the CPI) is an interesting idea though. I'd dispute the rate though. As for the Tobin tax, it's the best idea this party has, but it won't work unless all major trading nations adopt it too. The tax and trust policies are nice in theory, but good luck making any progress there; tax and trust law... My head hurts just thinking about it.

27 Oct 2011 06:44p.m.

Stephen Berry wrote:

Minto is pulling his figures out of thin air. If a $5,000 income tax free thresholf is worth $10 a week per person then how does a $27,000 income tax free threshold provide $200 a week? Where does the $93 trillion figure on trading in the New Zealand dollar come from? The total economic activity of China and the USA combined was worth less than $30 trillion in 2009. Do you think they're making it up? Minto also states that the abolition of

27 Oct 2011 06:07p.m.

M1 wrote:

"We no longer have the situation where low wages are low... " says Minto. No Minto, your right. Instead you'd have a situation where low wages are higher, more jobs move offshore, and more people are unemployed.

27 Oct 2011 05:26p.m.

john wrote:

If the MANA party rule they would what? Please god dont let anyone vote for these very short sighted habitual complainers and bludgers. If there is no money going into the Government coffers, roads, hospital, the country's infrastructure etc etc wont get built and maintained. genius MANA party real genius.

27 Oct 2011 05:13p.m.

cherie wrote:

This guy is a plonker How does paying GST on a Merc vrs a morri hit the poor? How on earth is all this rubbish going to be paid for. Good sensible people will not vote for idiots

27 Oct 2011 04:15p.m.

Andrew wrote:

Dan is correct; it is equitable that you pay progressively higher rate of tax when you control the vast majority of wealth. Those that get paid the minimum wage are often not proportionally remunerated for the fruits of their labours so it is only just and equitable that they are not taxed as much or at all as the case may be. The wealthy who exploit their labours to obtain vast profit can pay it on their behalf.

27 Oct 2011 04:00p.m.

Wiseacre wrote:

@Matt - *sigh* - that old lie again? The top 10% of taxpayers do not pay 72% of the tax take. It's just some thinly veiled mathematical chicanery to try and justify a pathetic 'pity the poor rich guy' argument. In reality, the recently published Tax Working Group Report found that the top 10% of taxpayers contribute 44% of income tax receipts. Some top income earners will claim that this means that they pay a disproportionate share of the tax; what they neglect to point out is that the top earners pay a larger proportion of income tax because they take a much higher proportion of the income. Not to mention they own a lot more of the capital, which they are currently avoiding tax on. None of which takes into account GST, a regressive tax which accounts for 26% of the total tax-take, and which takes up a much higher proportion of a workers minimum wage than it does for someone on $150,000. Replacing GST with a Financial Transactions Tax is an exellent idea that is long overdue and should have been implemented ages ago. It requires the banks, the bankers, the currency traders and financial speculators and all those greedy bastards that brought the world economy crashing down in 2008 to give a tiny little fraction of each transaction back. A tiny little fraction of each transaction that could add up to billions of dollars in revenue. By replacing GST with a financial transactions tax, more money would be in the pockets of the masses, leading to more spending and a stronger, healthier economy. Nothing much to argue against there. But, unfortunately, some people won't accept the idea simply because it's coming from the Mana Party. How sad.

27 Oct 2011 03:10p.m.

Dan wrote:

@Matt Yes, because have that much of the country's wealth. Next question?

27 Oct 2011 03:04p.m.

patrick wrote:

it seems a pity that those attending the occupy movements are themselves a "1 percent": paranoid outcasts. they wouldn't recognise a decent left wing policy if it gave them a job to fill their thursday afternoons.