• Full Story

Maori Party may quit Government

Print

Tue, 31 Jan 2012 1:34p.m.

Maori Party co-leader Tariana Turia (file)

Maori Party co-leader Tariana Turia (file)

The Maori Party may consider walking out of its relationship with the National Party over asset sales.

Co-leader Tariana Turia says the party will “consider its position” with the Government over plans to remove reference to the Treaty of Waitangi when state-owned assets are partially sold.

The National-led Government has begun to consult Maori on its plans to sell up to 49 percent of four state-owned energy companies and further reduce its stake in Air New Zealand – consultation which is required to proceed with the sales.

The Government is now being accused of selling Treaty rights to the highest bidder after suggestions Treaty protections will not be included in the new sale legislation.

Maori Party co-leader Pita Sharples says the Treaty clause is “not just about Maori” and protects the country’s natural resources.

State-Owned Enterprises Minister Tony Ryall says the section of the SOE Act requiring the Crown to act in a manner consistent with the principles of the Treaty was left out of legislation surrounding the 1999 sale of Contact Energy, as well as earlier asset sales.

He says Government is “interested in seeking Maori views” on the issue, but Ms Turia says the removal of the Treaty clause was not discussed in supply and confidence negotiations between National and the Maori Party.

She compared the issue to that of the foreshore and seabed, and says the Maori Party will listen to their constituents on the issue.

“It's really in the iwi hands… because we're here representing their interests and our people’s interests,” she says.

Maori Party MPs will meet with iwi leaders to gather their reaction, although some have already made their displeasure known and a protest hikoi has been suggested.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

01 Feb 2012 08:04p.m.

Alex wrote:

Brian what I don't understand is why you bring MMP into this. A majority of voters chose to retain it in the referendum just been. Going back to FPP would give National an unhealthy majority to push their asset sales even further (unless that's what you want). The Maori Party would still have their three seats, perhaps more depending on the rezoning of electorates under other voting systems.

01 Feb 2012 08:33a.m.

Gosh wrote:

These assets didn’t exist when the treaty was signed. So any claim to ownership is invalid.

01 Feb 2012 07:13a.m.

Homer wrote:

@Craig, the Maori people might be race based but the National party are wealth based, they will only look after the well off and the rest are screwed.

31 Jan 2012 10:42p.m.

brian wrote:

Alex: Without MMP this would never have surfaced. What don't you understand?

31 Jan 2012 08:45p.m.

Craig wrote:

No loss there, one of if not the most ineffectual party in politics. Based on a race based policy to further a race based agenda. Never has anyone made a comment in relation to the maori kids bashed to death every other week but always with the hand out. No nationwide hui paid for by the tax payer about child deaths, but asset sales.

31 Jan 2012 07:56p.m.

Alex wrote:

@Brian, if that happens consider the Maori Party re-elected. This will happen under any other system of voting. Only the Maori party and Labour are willing enough to nominate candidates in the Maori seats. National never bother because they have a next to nothing shot at winning one.

31 Jan 2012 03:45p.m.

brian wrote:

Who really cares? If it "forces" another election I'm positive the majority of NZers will vote in an intelligent way to eliminate the effect the scourge MMP has created. It's high time the minorities loose their excessive power - the short tails waging the dog - and these moaners lost their ability to hold us all up to ransom yet again especially when getting their many "full and final" settlements again and again, ad nauisium. All these settlements anyway seem to have gone to empire building for the "top tails" and precious little - if any - can be seen flowing down to most of the Maori peoples. I'm sick and tired of it all as is most NZers. Maori Party, get lost. NZ is for ALL here in NZ, all races, everybody, not just the few who can claim - at best - ¼, or 1/8th Maori blood as their excuse to continue ripping us all off.

31 Jan 2012 03:12p.m.

Chris wrote:

Iwi want in ++ as they can see it being as a lucrative investment - a number of Iwi have already stated this. The Nats. don't need the Moari Party to get the asset investment's underway. This is about 'politicking' to negaotiate a better deal for Maori. The Maori Party knows that being ouside the tent and shouting get's one no where - just as Winston Peters will find out soon. It's lonely being in opposition.

31 Jan 2012 02:18p.m.

aiden wrote:

no they wont, because iwi are the largest group of buyers standing on the sideline waiting to buy these shares. negotiations haven't even begun to the legislation for selling shares in these assets, this is just the maori party flexing it's muscles for that.