Maori Party should do deal, says commentator

Print

Tue, 29 Nov 2011 7:03a.m.

Maori Party co-leader Tariana Turia (AAP)

Maori Party co-leader Tariana Turia (AAP)

The National Party may not need the Maori Party in its coalition in order to govern, but after the positive relationship the two groups have managed to create and maintain over the past three years they may get into bed anyway.

Political commentator Ella Henry says the Maori Party’s best option for its constituents is to do a deal with the Government.

“I think political history tells us that the people who are at the top table are more effective than the rabble who are standing at the front of the table shouting and throwing sticks and bread,” she says.

Ms Henry says there have been clear benefits for Maori during National’s reign and these have all come from the Maori Party, such as the repeal of the foreshore and seabed act.

“I think that they were tangible achievements, the rest of it was really being at the table presenting a Maori perspective on all issues,” she says.

Ms Henry says criticism of the party from Mana Party leader Hone Harawira, who effectively accused the Maori Party of being National’s lapdog, has not been felt in the electorates and this has been reflected in the Maori Party’s strong party vote numbers.

Lower voter numbers have been the talking point in the post-election fallout and Ms Henry says a large amount of voter apathy was behind this year’s poor results.

“I think many felt ‘National’s going to win, if I’m not a National supporter, why bother?” she says.

Maori Party co-leaders Pita Sharples and Tariana Turia are both expected to resign from politics at the next election.

Click ‘view video’ to watch the full interview.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

05 Dec 2011 02:21p.m.

james wrote:

I have already laid a complaint to the human rights comission regrds discriminating on employment status and disabilty before national gets the chance to change legislation regards this.

01 Dec 2011 06:15p.m.

Te Kohu wrote:

The right [Nats, Banks and Donne] has won this 2011 election, and they will carry through on their 'so-called' mandate to shift further to the right. The Maori Party must look ahead and prepare itself for 2014. They can only do this by heeding the voters [those who remained loyal, those who defected to Mana and those who failed to vote]. The Maori Party have lost not just Te Tai Tonga, but a large number of voters to Mana and to the centre-right. Mana will never be in government while its current leaders remain, so their role in the next three or six years will be rowdy, ineffectual spoilers. Maori Party must put up more candidates, especially in general electorates with substantial Maori voters, only then can they rasie their party votes above the 5% threshhold.

01 Dec 2011 10:49a.m.

Rangi wrote:

Yes all this is very well, but why are Maori not seeing some of the benefits of all these deals to help us. It only seems to be the fat cats like hone, Pita and Tariana and the people running the trusts that benefit. Nice homes, cars, superannuation funds and early retirement while the rest of us get nothing and cannot put Kai on the table. I think us Maori need to have a close look at who we have managing our affairs. "Kia Kaha"

30 Nov 2011 07:57a.m.

The Honest Truth wrote:

The "seperatist" Maori Party needs to realign it's alegiance with the "all inclusive" Mana Party for Maori to have any decent voice in this flaud democratic system elective government. 'Seperatist,' of which I'm not agaist and in support of however it's proper place would be in a Maori only election reasserting Maori (Iwi Collective) as its own independent state hence the confusion of the "seperatist" Maori Party infiltrating with no merit at all other than to concede soveriengty to the bullyish, tomenting, historically sadistic treaty infered partner (Crown). "Flaud," as democracy in New Zealand legitamately excuses the legal right to acknowledge and recognise two soveriegn nations living in one country. How will New Zealand ever be able to move forward when a state of denial and state induced amnesia is enforce? Maori need to take it's rightful place on the global political stage as a fully pledge independent state, nothing more and nothing less. Wake up! It's not rocket science!

29 Nov 2011 01:34p.m.

wondering wrote:

The Maori party are relying on being in the embrace of the majority, being on the popular team even if it means carrying the spit bucket. What happens if the special votes flip the potential majority and Maori party have lost the bet. Safer to put a bob each way for now.

29 Nov 2011 01:34p.m.

Memo wrote:

Will it be more beneficial for the Maori Party to sit in with national and watch their people slump into even more despair, poverty, ill health and troubled ways as has been the case over the previous three years!?!

They believe if they are sitting in with Keys they will stand a better chance of benefiting from asset sales via iwi funds etc (not really interested in halting sales, Sharples has been recorded saying just that) However if this is realized it will be perceived as preferential treatment thus alienating the majority of Aotearoa.

Some would argue that they have a better chance of being heard in opposition, as will especially be the case over the next three years.
It is not always as beneficial to argue the gains as opposed to what has or is being lost. (As they admit themselves they will have little say in events even if they are sitting with Keys ).

Acknowledging the predicted rocky road ahead the “Maori Party” risk losing all credence assuming they form this alliance with National. By all accounts they appear to be in a frightful predicament!!

29 Nov 2011 01:07p.m.

Clarke wrote:

How many poor disadvantaged children did you kill with your vote cherie?. How many suicide victims will there be under this government?. The death toll begins to mount, maori will be some of the first to feel its effects. What I would like to see is the media showing the extent of the damage that Nationals upcoming policies will cause. Sick people unable to have people who care about them, because according to Nationals new policies if you have someone that cares about you emotionally you have to support them financially. No freedom of choice. Children dying because their parents have been pushed to breaking by National. Strongarm robberies will increase, but how much death will be caused by the presence of John Key? I would have to say it will be substantial.

29 Nov 2011 11:53a.m.

Bruce wrote:

A good tactic for any political party is always to spend time in the opposition seats. The Maori party like to support any party that is in Government. They supported the last Labour government. Now they look as if they are going to support a second term National government after supporting the first term National government. To get in touch with their constituents, The Maori party should spend a term in the opposition benches.

29 Nov 2011 11:35a.m.

cherie wrote:

@Clark yes some Maori are against asset sales. Mr Sahrple and Mrs Turia are. However the sales are going to happen if they are at the table or not. It is good for them to be sitting at the table. The other choice is go and sit with Winston and Hone and see what you achieve for the people who did vote for you.

29 Nov 2011 09:02a.m.

Max wrote:

Yes sell out like last time, why Maori vote for the Maori party in its present state is beyond me and i hate race based partys.