Maori question sentence laid down for Moses' death

Print

Sat, 15 Aug 2009 12:00a.m.

By Jesse Peach

Experts in Maori custom are questioning how it all went so wrong in the fatal exorcism of Janet Moses.

The judge allowed the five family members found guilty of manslaughter to escape jail sentences yesterday because they had a genuine and firm belief in makutu, or curses.

But their idea of tradition is being questioned by other Maori.

Dr Amster Reedy is a tohunga - an expert in Maori tradition. He says makutu is a sacred ritual that requires many years of study to understand.

"It's nothing that you would want to play around with or be innovative with," he says. "The maketu requires a dedication of the mind."

Ms Moses died when her family members performed what they believed to be a makutu, pouring water into her mouth and eyes for hours.

"I think the use of water there was a misunderstanding there," says Dr Reedy. "Water is generally used for purification."

While he says this so-called makutu did not follow tradition, the judge said that "act of tradition" was a reason they escaped jail time.

Professor Rawiri Taonui agrees they may not have meant to harm the mother of two, but thinks they got off lightly. He can't accept that in this case, tikanga - or Maori custom - has been used as an excuse.

"At the end of the day they did kill her. They did cause her death, and the tikanga they applied was a distortion of the tikanga most Maori would know."

He says this shows that the justice system can't deal with traditional practice.

"The Moses case has highlighted that perhaps one way forward in cases like this, it might be better to have a Maori judge and a Pakeha judge sit alongside each other."

Prof Taonui believes a Maori judge may even have given a firmer sentence, and not accepted this was makutu.

"If a Pakeha is trying to determine these things on their own, on one hand they'd probably be too dismissive of Maori things, but on the other hand and perhaps this case, been too dismissive."

He says this is a case of Maori misunderstanding their own rituals, and perhaps Pakeha wrongly interpreting them as authentic.

3 News
Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

12 Nov 2009 09:06a.m.

No Excuse wrote:

I don't think there's anything nice about this situation to be said, putting aside these beliefs the bottom line is they killed someone, a mother those children now have to grow up without their mother, these people need to pay for what they did, they took an innocent person's life and there should be no excuse for that

17 Aug 2009 05:08p.m.

someone who understands wrote:

what do you mean its time for maori to wake up to the 21st century and abandoned their maori beliefs if anythink is a disgrace its moron people like you judging other peoples culture and not only that making comments about matters that one dont concern you and two somthink you dont even have full facts on have you every heard that whanaus side of the event? NO only what the media says and thats only pick out parts.dont judge if you aint got nathink nice too dont say anythink at all

16 Aug 2009 03:27p.m.

John Phillips wrote:

What a disgrace the whole issue has been. If there had been firmer sentences then we would be hearing Maoris hysterically critacal of that. Time Maoris woke up to the 21st century, abandoned their outmoded tribalism and ridiculous and often bogus "beliefs" and joined the real world. The outcome of this trial of these morons has done the reverse of that.