Wed, 20 Jan 2010 4:20p.m.
By Mike McRoberts
Filed Wednesday January 20
Whether or not journalists should be part of a story or not is one of those issues that surface from time to time.
I was reminded of it again today when I “stepped in” to a story. We found a five year old girl at a relief camp who had a badly broken arm and a gaping infected wound in her leg. She hadn’t been treated since the earthquake and medics at the camp were concerned she may lose her leg if she wasn’t operated on that day.
Trouble was neither they or anyone else at the camp had a vehicle. We did and we stepped in.
I carried her around the hospital grounds as we sought the right treatment for her and after the best part of the day waiting she had her operation.
Clearly I have no problem with journalists stepping into a story. The whole “a journalist must stay detached” stuff is just crap.
I’ve always said that I’m a human being first and a journalist second, and if I’m in a position to help someone I will.
In saying that I don’t think a journalist should be the story either. Unfortunately too many reporters these days seem to get the two things confused?
I remember when my crew and I were “detained” by Hezbollah during the war in Lebanon in 2006. We decided after we’d been safely released after an hour and a half that we wouldn’t make a story of it.
Hundreds of people were dying and our slightly uncomfortable experience didn’t deserve to have equal billing.
There have been many times over the years when I’ve stepped into a story, and I don’t regret a single one of them. I can’t say that for the other times when I haven’t.