Dotcom bail opposed, Crown cite helicopter on lawn
Mon, 23 Jan 2012 4:49a.m.
By James Murray with NZN
Proceedings at North Shore District Court have been adjourned to 2:15pm after the crown argued Megaupload founder Kim Schmitz should not be given bail, partially because he has a helicopter on his front lawn.
It has also been argued that Schmitz poses an extreme flight risk as he has multiple passports and is a citizen of several countries.
His risk of reoffending and the sheer size of this intellectual property case have also been used as reasons to not grant bail.
Judge David McNaughton raised concerns about the discovery of shotguns on Schmitz's property, and described them as an "aggravating factor to bail application".
However, Schmitz's defence says the scale of the police operation against Megaupload was unnecessarily grandiose.
They object to the way search and arrest warrants were carried out, especially where armed offenders arrived in helicopters and dropped into the Dotcom mansion courtyard.
The defence are arguing this has amplified any offending, which Schmitz denies, "beyond reality" and misrepresents the business of "uploading". They argue the arrests were made in this way to "present the most dramatic intentions" and launch the case.
They are also arguing that Schmitz would be unable to carry on the business at the centre of the charges as Megaupload has been shut down, saying he has no interest in restarting the business until this matter is resolved.
Schmitz would be seeking redress for the significant losses to his business.
His lawyers also dispute the helicopter claim saying New Zealand is too far away from other countries for it to be used to abscond. They also say it is unlikely he would be able to use a private jet, and this would be hard financially as all but one of his funds have been frozen.
He is on his own in the dock and denies any criminal conduct or the extistence of any "mega-conspiracy".
Meanwhile, there are reports Megaupload may have lost the services of high-profile defence lawyer Robert Bennett because of a conflict involving at least one other client of his law firm Hogan Lovells.
Reuters says the news comes from someone "familiar with the matter".
Mr Bennett is a highly successful defence lawyer who has represented Bill Clinton and energy company Enron.
US lawyers abide by an ethical code which generally does not allow them to represent "two clients whose interests are at odds".
Bennett had been working for Megaupload, in non-criminal matters, before the conspiracy and copyright charges were laid.
Three other men facing internet piracy charges following the FBI-led investigation to appear in North Shore District court later.
The men spent the weekend in jail, after they were arrested in Auckland on Friday.
Police raided the rented Auckland mansion of Kim Dotcom, also known as Kim Schmitz, who founded internet upload site www.megaupload.com.
He is a 38-year-old German national with New Zealand residency.
Questions have been raised about how he was granted residency, with New Zealand First leader Winston Peters calling for an immigration inquiry.
Warwick Tuck, head of immigration, said Dotcom was granted residency under the investor plus category, which allows people to gain residency if they invest $10 million in New Zealand.
Mr Tuck says his previous convictions were disclosed and had been considered.
Dotcom and the other accused appeared on Friday in North Shore District Court, where they were remanded in custody to reappear on Monday.
The other three are Megaupload's chief marketing officer Finn Batato, 38, chief technical officer and co-founder Mathias Ortmann, 40, both from Germany, and Dutch national Bram van der Kolk, 29, who is also a New Zealand resident.
The men are among seven charged in the global sting. The FBI is working to extradite them to the US.
3 News / NZN
Post a Comment
Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide
(Won't be published)
27/01/2012 3:33:31 p.m.
NZ lackiness ~ arse kissers. DEAD RIGHT. Those big media companies are chucking their weight around like the thugs they are but NZ shouldn't be bending over forwards for them. The People should clone megaupload x a million and break their bastid big biz backs. We've let them take ownership of law enforcement and it's we who will have to fix that.
Back to the lackeys. The NZ police are also freezeframed here internationally as looters. The property of the individual they have slavishly arrested has NOT been found by any court to belong to anyone but him yet. And until it is, it should not be touched.
@sizemik re:heli yep :) classic
26/01/2012 1:42:47 a.m.
we should not be following what other countries tells us to do...NZ has no more originality so much for being a neutral country.
24/01/2012 8:40:11 p.m.
The charges are bogus, a judge with even a teeny tiny bit of integrity would grant bail and when the extradition session comes up - tell the FBI to stuff off and come back with something worth bothering our legal system with....
24/01/2012 4:40:47 p.m.
ROFL . . . Is Mr Dotcom a flight risk? ... "I believe so Your Honour ... he has a chopper parked on his front lawn." LMFAO.
23/01/2012 6:25:40 p.m.
The deutsche are clever people , and NZ Citizens , meine gott.Keep america out of our country please.I would class someone stealing a sausage roll as worse than these brothers.
23/01/2012 5:35:42 p.m.
Shame on NZ govt for yet again, kiss assing the FBI and Hollywood corporate types. At least NZ isn't laying charges! Hope these guys get off scott free and get damages paid out to them. I can't think of any harm they have done to NZ...
23/01/2012 3:46:50 p.m.
given that the US has a fun history in recent times of the use of torture in response to accusations and prior to any legal process and bypassing their own laws by using allied facilities, i fail to see how extradition there can be legitimately considered by anyone for ANYTHING.
23/01/2012 2:14:16 p.m.
Bad look wrote:
The ranbo tactics and NZ lackiness will put kiwis around the world at risk of being hated as much as the Americans now.
23/01/2012 1:36:13 p.m.
They are simply "storage space" provider, if granted extradition to US then many others are potentially liable been sue by content developer (e.g. Ports, Storage space providers, all those shipping companies...) Its no longer safe for them to provide temporary or permanent storage solutions for individuals, because if those individuals provide any illegal contents, and storage provider did not 'filter' them then the storage provider (in this case Megaupload) are been sue for their client's (individual's) misbehaving..
The court should throw it out, there is no logic behind the arrest!..
Perhaps the computer storage devices companies can also be sue for client may purchase/lease their product to do criminal/illegal activities, hence the device manufacturer's responsibility to keep the devices clean and free of illegal activities? simply impossible and illogical!
All 350 passengers on board a commuter train that derailed e...
Now police in one city have reported dramatic results, slash...
Tourists in Christchurch are being kicked out of the interna...
A man is dead and a woman is critically injured after an inc...
Copyright © 2013 MediaWorks TV. All Rights Reserved.