Mining U-turn humiliating, says Goff

Print

Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:10p.m.

Labour leader Phil Goff says National didn't 'listen' to the public, but rather the backdown was forced (NZPA file)

Labour leader Phil Goff says National didn't 'listen' to the public, but rather the backdown was forced (NZPA file)

By Chris Ormond of NZPA

National's U-turn on mining is a forced and humiliating back-down rather than a case of the party listening to the people, Labour leader Phil Goff says.

Energy and Resources Minister Gerry Brownlee and Conservation Minister Kate Wilkinson today confirmed that the party had ditched plans to remove conservation land in the Coromandel, Great Barrier Island and Paparoa National Park from protected schedule four status so it could be prospected for minerals.

It had proposed opening up 7000 hectares of such land but the plans sparked a huge groundswell of opposition.

Mr Brownlee said of over 37,000 submissions on the issue, most said no land should be removed from schedule four. "We heard that message loud and clear," he said today.

Watch video of Mr Brownlee's mining announcement

Mr Goff said New Zealanders would now celebrate a victory over what was a "mad-cap" scheme, and that any suggestions National had simply listened to the voice of New Zealand were wrong.

"It's not listening, it's being forced to change when 40,000 people march up Queen Street and 37,000 people sign a petition saying 'this is stupid and we'll change our votes if you don't change your policy'," he said.

"New Zealanders did not want to see their pristine conservation estate in their national parks dug up for mines."

Green Party co-leader Metiria Turei said the tens of thousands of New Zealanders who rallied against the mining proposals could take a bow and celebrate the decision.

She gave the Government some credit for reacting to public opinion but said it had not gone about the process of selling the proposals well and had been arrogant towards those who spoke out against them.

Ms Turei said she was proud of the part her party played in spearheading the charge against mining in the conservation estate.

"You look after the things you love, and thousands of New Zealanders have reminded John Key of this simple truth over the last year. As a result, we've changed the agenda on mining in New Zealand."

Ms Wilkinson said today 14 areas totalling 12,400 hectares of land would be added to schedule four and future land given classifications similar to schedule four, such as national parks and marine reserves, would automatically become part of schedule four.

Ms Turei said that was just a case of rubber-stamping what the Department of Conservation already had on the table, but it was good to see some areas would get automatic protected status in the future.

She said while there could be scope to mine in areas where there was no danger of environmental damage being caused, plans to examine parts of Northland and the West Coast were concerning and New Zealanders needed to keep a close eye on the Government's future plans for mineral exploration on Crown land.

NZPA

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

21 Jul 2010 03:06p.m.

Logs wrote:

Now that we've stopped the Mining, we need to stop china buying up our farm land...

20 Jul 2010 05:43p.m.

Bobby2010 wrote:

Many voters will making U-turns when they go to the ballots. They have enough of Key n associates' clowning in Parliament and devoid of perception of people's wishes like mining and the Hubbards !!!

20 Jul 2010 05:34p.m.

Andrew wrote:

This is all very reminiscent of the nuclear debate when we failed to differentiate between nuclear powered ships and ships carrying nuclear weapons. At the time only David Lange seemed to recognise that there was a difference. Are we taking about open cast mining or below ground mining here? Once again, there is a difference.

20 Jul 2010 05:02p.m.

Ian wrote:

The left will see this as a win but it is not. Key smartly moves in the 'central middle ground' where elections are won or lost.
You will never please the extremists at both ends of the debate.
Nortland and the West Coast will have aerial surveys with the potential to mine there. The left don't come up with any alternatives - they just continue their free money mentality.

20 Jul 2010 04:57p.m.

Kim wrote:

@andrew
You are forgetting the millions of dollars spent on this farce.
Any true New Zealander knew from the start that this would be a no go. But did that stop them spending millions on consultants and the public submissions process? No
This is a govt that brings out extreame proposals then backs back to the position it wanted in the first place to make it look like they are listening.
example..The tax working group, mining, law and order, employment relations...etc etc

20 Jul 2010 02:53p.m.

Grant wrote:

What's humiliating is having Phil Goff as leader of Labour. Criticizing and moaning does not win elections.

20 Jul 2010 01:45p.m.

Andrew wrote:

How is it humiliating? The goverment released a "discussion document" NOT a "We are doing this no matter what anyone says document" got some feedback, and then made an informed decision based on what the people wanted, and decided against the proposals. Is this not how democracy is suppose to work or did i miss something?