3News » Home
Full Story

Minto tells court no case to answer over tennis arrests

3 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
Minto and seven others were arrested on charges of disorderly behavior and obstructing police (file pic)

Minto and seven others were arrested on charges of disorderly behavior and obstructing police (file pic)

Tue, 09 Feb 2010 4:25p.m.

Veteran protestor John Minto was back in court for the first time in 20 years today to tell a judge there was no case to answer after he was arrested for protesting at the ASB Classic tennis tournament in Auckland last month.

Minto and seven others were arrested on charges of disorderly behavior and obstructing police when they protested at the presence of Israeli player Shahar Peer in the tournament.

They told Judge Chris Field in Auckland District Court they were not guilty, there was no case to answer and they would be applying to have the charges struck out.

They were all remanded to April for that application to be heard and for a trial date in September.

Outside the court they said their application to have the charges thrown out was on the basis that the charges lacked the basic elements to be proven in court.

Minto, a veteran protester who gained an international profile when he led a nationwide campaign to stop the Springbok rugby team touring New Zealand in 1981, said he had not been arrested for protest activity for 20 years.

He said the protesters believed they had a very strong case to have the charges thrown out. Their protest was annoying but not disruptive, he said.

NZPA

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [3]

Obiwan
10 Feb 2010 9:25p.m.

If Minto is let off, then it will be OK to interfere with the rights of others, including turning up anywhere one likes, including say the Courts and protest in a similar manner. Protest is OK but affecting the rights of others is not. Minto interfered with the rights of the Israeli tennis player, the organisers of the tournament and the spectators, and likely surrounding propertiy owners as well.
His actions have been cowardly and extremely intrusive.
That was his choice - now pay the price for that choice.
I am quite sure he would not be a happy man if others came to protest at his place of residence because of his interference with the rights of others.
His "no case to answer" argument shows that he has not a shred of decency or respect for the rights of others.
Instead, he thinks that his rights should be elevated above all other.

Fred
10 Feb 2010 6:47a.m.

Minto is a joke!

Alex
09 Feb 2010 8:17p.m.

Before anyone starts spouting rubbish: John Minto is probably right. Cases like these are usually thrown out because the police present no evidence - they only make the arrests to disrupt protests. It's an attack on freedom of expression and more New Zealanders need to know that the police actually sometimes do act overzealously.

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio

Post your opinion

3News - What changes would you make to MMP?
The Govt and lobby groups are urging people to have their say on
Comments (12)