3News » Home
Full Story

NZ, Australia can win whaling case against Japan

8 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
Many New Zealanders have made their anti-whaling stance very clear (NZPA)

Many New Zealanders have made their anti-whaling stance very clear (NZPA)

Tue, 25 May 2010 4:04p.m.

New Zealand and Australia can win an International Court of Justice (IJC) case against Japan over its whaling practices, a legal specialist says.

Australia National University international law Professor Donald Rothwell is touring New Zealand this week, talking about legal options open to challenge Japanese whaling before international courts.

The forums were organised by Green Party MP Gareth Hughes.

At Parliament today, Prof Rothwell said New Zealand could join forces with Australia, which has placed a November deadline on Japan to stop whaling or face the ICJ, or head to court alone.

He said there is a strong chance that a case against Japan would succeed.

He was reluctant to speculate as to what a loss would mean.

"If you make your sole legal case that what Japan is doing is not scientific, but commercial whaling, and the international court was to come down with an unfavourable ruling, that clearly would be undesirable.

"But I'm doubtful the international court would say that. Even if you would conceive that it would be a loss, the court would have to say well there are limits to what you can take for scientific purposes.

"They might have to put some sort of number on what those would be."

The International Whaling Commission (IWC) released a proposal last month that would allow Japan, Norway and Iceland to continue commercial whaling for another decade, despite a global ban.

The environmentally delicate Southern Ocean would be designated as a sanctuary, but whalers from Japan would still be allowed to take a number of the marine mammals from the seas around Antarctica.

The Government was unimpressed with the proposal, and Foreign Minister Murray McCully said it would continue with the diplomatic process though he added, if all failed, the Government might consider ICJ route.

The proposal will be decided on at the next IWC meeting in June in Morocco.

Mr Hughes said taking Japan to international court should be considered.

"We should use all the tools," he said.

"Australia has been very strong is saying they'll do it if the diplomatic process falls over.

"I think we're heading up to a failure in Morocco next month.

"Our Government said some aspects are unacceptable. We still don't know what the Government's clear bottom lines are and what they are prepared to compromise."

NZPA

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [8]

atrout
05 Jun 2010 2:40p.m.

Hey Kaitiaki, you truly need to stop chewing the carpet and have a better look around you. Innocent whales!!!!??? How can a whale be innocent or guilty? They are animals and don't share your moral burden with you. Who would want to in any case? What's the guardian and stand tall stuff all about? Are you claiming some sort of moral highground? What's your connection to the earth? Any different to mine? Not likely eh? Your work is looking after all creatures great and small. Good of you to be so undiscriminating. Who pays for your white bread and tinned tuna sandwiches? Who puts a roof over your head? If it is the taxpayer then you can get off my payroll thanks.

Kaitiaki
03 Jun 2010 5:42a.m.

Kia Ora
Jim, Regarding your statements. Go home? This is our home? You want to share whale sushi with seaweed crackers for tea? Or maybe speak a foriengn language? I have a job,looking after "ALL CREATURES GREAT AND SMALL." Like you.(Small) "the holier than thou" taught me that. What the hell did you learn.I hope you learn how to get out of your jungle when the japs come and take it off you. Now crawl back up your tree and peel another bananna. "KIA KAHA KIA MANA" (Be Strong Stand up for what you believe in.)Green Necks will be red necks if we dont stop slaughtering NOW. Come on everyone save our innocent creatures NOW.

Evolutionist
26 May 2010 10:52p.m.

Save the whales... Save the dolphins... How long before we have save the pigs? Oh yeah... already there. It's funny how we teach evolution in our schools and then fight against its principles every day by trying to preserve species that are dying out. If they are strong enough they will survive, if not... the weak perish.

Anna
26 May 2010 9:38a.m.

Greenpeace are anti-corporation now not an environmentalist movement. Their statistics aren't always current and a large number of their members are swept up by the flashy speeches, doom and gloom rather than doing their own research and making their own minds up.

Darren
25 May 2010 10:18p.m.

Adam, I don't like Greenpeace either - but I will continue to support them until the NZ government stops fence sitting 'diplomacy' and starts to get active against these international criminals, the Japanese.

Adam
25 May 2010 8:11p.m.

Tony get lost. Greenpeace are terrorists - they lie, manipulate and use violence. Please done try your 'poor whale' routine here is does not work. My daughter used to belong to 'Greenpeace' untill I found out what sort of tactics they use nowdays - my daughter also was disgusted and left. The original Green peace of years ago has now changed for the worse.

tony
25 May 2010 4:56p.m.

dont listen to old jim up there. not the most educated person, which such comment. what jim is doing, is the same as the new zealand goverment is. which is turning a blind eye, to an illegal activity. which has been in force since 1986. i ask the public, to help save our whales. the same whales we see on our coast lines are the same ones getting killed for their meat. so support sea shepherd, wwf greenpeace

Jim
25 May 2010 4:29p.m.

Go home you "holier than thou" biggots and get a job (damn Green Necks)!!!

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio