• Full Story

NZ homes overpriced by 25 percent, Economist warns

Print

Tue, 06 Dec 2011 9:14a.m.

A British magazine article says NZ is among nine countries that are "uncomfortably overvalued"

A British magazine article says NZ is among nine countries that are "uncomfortably overvalued"

New Zealand homes are over-priced by 25 per cent and this "housing bubble" is set to burst just as it did in the United States, the Economist has warned.

The international magazine included New Zealand in a group of countries - Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Britain, the Netherlands, Spain and Sweden - where it says property is "uncomfortably overvalued".

These nine countries are at the same point as the United States towards the peak of its housing bubble, claims the article entitled House of Horrors.

"Another concern is that Australia, Britain, Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Spain and Sweden all have even higher household-debt burdens in relation to income than America did at the peak of its bubble," the article warns.

"Overvalued prices and large debts leave households vulnerable to a rise in unemployment or higher mortgage rates. A credit crunch or recession could cause house prices to tumble in many more countries."

But New Zealand real estate agency Barfoot & Thompson told the New Zealand Herald the country's property prices were simply a reflection of demand and supply.

"A lot of the houses these days are sold by auction and when you have limited choice, especially in the inner city, like (Auckland's) Mt Eden, Epsom, you get three or four parties that are wanting that one property. That's how the prices go up," the agency's managing director Peter Thompson said.

He rubbished the article for "basically calling all buyers and vendors fools".

Another firm, Bayleys, accused the magazine of sweeping generalisations, and said the market was setting the price and `savvy' New Zealanders were benefiting.

The Economist isn't the first to challenge New Zealand housing prices. The NZ Institute of Economic Research has warned it has concerns and the international survey Demographia has consistently placed New Zealand property among that most over-valued.

NZN

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

10 Jan 2012 07:37p.m.

Ben wrote:

A majority of typical kiwi small Business are stressed, small retailers (including cafes ) are paying insane rents, wealthy people (locals and immigrants) are paying crazy sums for so called 'safe' property , real estate agents urge them on because they are making ridiculous fees at all ends. Rents are at or above maximum affordable limits for the majority of occupants..residential or business.Home owners that can pay do,for as long as the economy keeps going beyond Euro/china slowdowns. Fonterra Dairy farmers laugh all the way to the bank and keep the gases boiling. The Govt keeps borrowing to lend int free to the children of the wealthy for useless uni degrees, the greedies earn huge sums from their investments and still take the national super, CEO's swim in their huge salaries, directors rort the board fees and politicians are creaming it (ask John or Bill)Something will give,but be sure the millionaires wont suffer! So,to the victims of capitalism I say,enjoy your ciggies,MacD's and Tuis and screw the system for all you can, while you can. Thats what the rich do!

10 Dec 2011 09:00a.m.

Geoff wrote:

The Economist has got it entirely wrong. NZ's residential building activity is right now the lowest it has been for 18 years. Why? For a variety of reasons but they all boil down to the fact that it is cheaper (and also easier) to buy than to build. With less new land available and building materials and labour costs only heading in one direction, up, house prices in NZ will not be getting any cheaper.

08 Dec 2011 02:54p.m.

ian wrote:

I am no economist,- but- Does not the open market set prices ?? "Set" too high and sales fail, "set" too low and stock becomes short in supply, and prices rise, YES or NO ??

08 Dec 2011 07:30a.m.

WhoKnew wrote:

TG I never bought into the "Keeping Up with the Jones" by going into massive debt!. So if you were one who was conned, I say Look to the BANKSTERS from the Govt down THEY knew YOU would destroy the economy and NZ only to be SOLD to the Globalists for pennys on the pound. LOL

07 Dec 2011 01:15a.m.

Max S wrote:

Real Estate agents, such as Barfoots, have lost all creditability because they always try to talk up the market. They do the same thing every time some organisation points out that our market is over valued. 1 plus 1 has always equalled 2 even if they keep telling us it equals 3!

06 Dec 2011 07:19p.m.

nigel wrote:

Datahead I looked at the statistics and read The Economist article I think the 4 is a typographical error. Furthermore if we are overvalued 66% based on rentals it seems bizarre to suggest we are only 4% overvalued based on income, that doesn’t make any sense. No one is pedalling gloom we are just deferring to the expertise of economic scientists over the opinions of real estate agents.

06 Dec 2011 03:44p.m.

Yeo wrote:

Kudos to Kanarahi for being honest despite being from the real estate industry. For the past 2 years I have been searching for an affordable decent home without any success. The limited range of houses does not favour the budget conscious purchasrs. The government should step in by planning low-cost residential schemes and building them. It can also compel private developers to incorporate a minimum percentage of low cost homes in their future projects. Whether the low cost houses are government initiatives or private, there must be a law to ensure only eligible people are allowed to purchase. Eligibility conditions should include only citizens and permanent residents whose household income are below a certain level. These form of restrictions will discourage investors from bulk buying, hence controlling rentals and defeating the very purpose of low cost housing schemes. Of course, foreigners should not be eligible. For the reselling of low cost homes, similar restrictions should also be applied to the new purchasers. This, in a way would curb excessive property value increases and discourage speculative intentions. The main objective of the scheme would thus be maintained and perpetuated in the long run. From time to time the maximum eligible household income could be raised to factor in the national inflation. The government should consider low cost housing for the short to medium term. In the long term, increasing the number of medium cost homes would further control the over-inflation of property prices, which in turn will improve the stability the economy. Meanwhile, foreign purchasers should be limited to only the high-end properties, say, NZ$600K on wards. Looking at the whole picture, I believe all responsible New Zealanders should lobby for some kind of initiatives or controls which will contribute towards the strengthening of the economy for the benefit of the Nation. Someone should start the ball rolling. Go forward NZ!

06 Dec 2011 03:15p.m.

nigel wrote:

Garth Barfoot glanced heavenward as the mile wide meteor coursed through the sky on a collision course with the viaduct. Turning to his client he said “It will probably miss; now about that property you wanted was that one million or two?”

06 Dec 2011 02:45p.m.

Datahead wrote:

Just wondering if anyone read the data before commenting? NZ is put on the table as only 4% overvalued by income - which is the LOWEST of the listed countries. It compares us to Australia, but they are 38% overvalued by income (thats 9x worse than us). Where our market differs the most is that it is 66% overvalued based on rental returns - which is the highest disparity. A much better reading of the data is that rents are too low. Go peddle your gloom somewhere else.

06 Dec 2011 02:23p.m.

Kanarahi wrote:

Well I am a Real Estate Salesperson, and I think the price of Real Estate should be halved. It is totally ridiculous. Yes there are fools paying over inflated prices, as the vendors are asking for them, and getting them. The whole system will go into meltdown shortly.
Rental accommodation is supplied by get-rich-quick landlords who exploit and scam every-one they can. People are forced to buy old "dungers" to avoid the exorbitant rentals and "do them up".
Un fortunately the only way to intervene in this spiral, is to have the government build lots of low-cost rental accommodation, and provide it for all the average low and middle-income earners.
This would stop all the sharky landlords and The average couple could rent, have areasonable standard of living. If they felt they had to buy a house at some later stage, prices would have dropped markedly, building supply firms that seem to be springing up all over the place would also have to drop their prices and we could get back to a reasonable economical level.
A cap on risiculous executive slaries and local body slary scams would be the next step in the process.
It's just that simple.
Of course everyone pushing their own little money trees, would scream like stuck pigs, as that always happens when something like this is seriously mooted.
If it's not something going wrong and everyone associated with the proplem screaming for compensation, it's loan sharks abd finance companies scamming the general public. There is a lot of greedy people out there making money, and they don't want to relax there lifestyles for a bit.
Let's start by lobbying our National MP's for lots of "Mickey Savage " low-cost housing for everyone. You would see the real estate prices drop overnight. Think about it. Do something. It has actually been suggested. Think about our kids who have got no show of buying a house and have to put up with absolutely sub-standard housing. It's total scam worked by the housing industry in NZ