NZ too focused on carbon emissions - study

Print

NZ too focused on carbon emissions - study

3News NZ

By Samantha Hayes

A new study says New Zealand is too focused on reducing carbon emissions and other environmental factors should take priority, like urban air quality, water quality and biodiversity.

Climate change minister Nick Smith agrees, but says the Government is not wasting time and money on an emissions trading scheme as the study suggests.

But Forest and Bird says they have both missed the point all together.

The children from Auckland's Pigeon Mountain primary school have been taught how important the environment is.

Janice Ho, 10, says “it's getting warmer and the ice bergs are melting and if the ice melts the sea level rises.

“The houses that live next to the sea will be covered with water.”

All 500 pupils have been making paper lanterns that will be exhibited in Copenhagen during the UN climate change conference next month.

Winston Zhao, 8, has a message for the suits in Copenhagen.

“I want them to hear the message that the earth is going to die if people don't start taking action.”

New Zealand hopes to strike a comprehensive deal, but a paper published by the Institute of Economic Research – the NZIER – says we are putting too much emphasis on climate change.

NZIER says it would place much greater emphasis on urban air quality, biodiversity and water quality rather than reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

NZIER says that is because our CO2 emissions account for only about 0.3 percent globally.

Climate change minister Nick Smith says while the report made some valuable points, the Government still needs to put a high priority on emissions reduction.

“What we do with our emissions trading scheme, what we do around trying to convert to cleaner energy technology is, of itself, not going to change the future of the international climate,” he says.

“What it is going to do is make plain that New Zealand is serious about doing its fair share.”

Kevin Hackwell of Forest and bird believes the think tank behind the report does not understand the issues.

“What they don't realise is that climate change is one of the key threats to biodiversity and that dealing with greenhouse gases can actually help biodiversity.”

Another critic, the World Wildlife Fund, WWF, agrees that these environmental goals "can, and should, be addressed together”.

While reducing emissions is not a priority to NZIER, they say meeting international climate change obligations are and it is the next generation that will be forced to live with the decisions this one makes.

Others are watching

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

4/11/2009 9:47:18 a.m.

Paul van Dinther wrote:

Gilbert O'Sughrue, What tipping point! What run away warming? Are you still buying the rubbish that warmist have been spouting on for so long? This planet has had CO2 levels as high as 2000ppm we are only at 350-380ppm. No runaway warming has ever happened in those millions of years. On a geological scale our current atmosphere is deprived of CO2 and it needs more not less. If biodiversity is wanted than restricting plant growth by taking away plant food (CO2) is not be the right way to go about it.

4/11/2009 7:22:13 a.m.

Alan wrote:

Who gave school's the right to frighten young children with as yet totally unproven garbage.

4/11/2009 7:06:52 a.m.

Glenn wrote:

So what I can read from this is that our contribution to emissions reduction will not amount to anything except for how wonderful we look to the rest of the world for making a stand, of course at the expense of ordinary NZ'ers who are already struggling and would not cope with rising costs to meet these goals.

3/11/2009 11:46:45 p.m.

cyril wrote:

Yes we need to do our share but we should follow not lead. we are such a small emitter in the world that sacrificing ourselves to be seen at the forefront of the charge is rediculous. When the biggest emitters toe the line then we should step up. Not before.

3/11/2009 11:45:45 p.m.

Gilbert O'Sughrue wrote:

The NZIER have got it back to front. Should the global climate reach the 'tipping point' that leads to runaway warming the resulting climate changes will more than wipe out any gains that we have made in biodiversity. Urban air quality will continue to suffer without reductions in carbon emissions and indeed in some places water quality will be adversely affected by rising sea levels.
All these issues can be mitigated by reducing emissions and ok, even if New Zealand's total emissions are small by global standards that is all the more reason to show the world that we are serious about this problem. The big polluters have been using the excuse that other nations aren't pulling their weight so why should they? It's pathetic I know but we have to take this excuse away from them and show solidarity on this issue.

Latest Headlines

Most Watched