NZers want cigarettes banned by 2020 - study

Print

Fri, 29 Jan 2010 5:43a.m.

About 21 percent of NZers smoke, causing more than 4000 deaths annually, and $1.5 billion in health costs

About 21 percent of NZers smoke, causing more than 4000 deaths annually, and $1.5 billion in health costs

Half the nation, including smokers, support completely banning cigarettes within 10 years, a study has found.

The 2008 Health and Lifestyles Survey compiled nationwide interviews from the Health Sponsorship Council of 1608 people, including 422 smokers, and has just been published in the NZ Medical Journal.

It found 49.8 percent of people agreed cigarettes should no longer be sold in New Zealand in 10 years, 30.3 percent disagreed and 19.9 percent neither agreed nor disagreed. Of the smokers surveyed, 26.2 percent agreed and 55.3 percent disagreed.

The study also showed public support for plain, unbranded cigarette packets and fewer tobacco retailers.

Pacific Islanders, in particular, showed strong support for the measures.

One of the study's authors, Dr George Thomson, from the University of Otago, Wellington, called on the Government to take action.

"There's now a need for politicians to embrace and act on the idea of a foreseeable and planned end to tobacco sales through a predicable timetable by 2020. The public wants more defined action to reduce smoking, and not a series of incremental steps."

The researchers said smoking was more affordable now than in 2001 and said the Government should increase tobacco taxes.

The average income had gone up but tobacco tax had not been raised above inflation.

"While the existing measures, such as smokefree legislation and improved quit support, are very important, if tobacco is becoming relatively more affordable, then these efforts are undermined and smoking is unlikely to decline, as price relative to income is a critical factor in the NZ market," researcher Professor Richard Edwards said.

About 21 percent of New Zealanders smoked, causing more than 4000 deaths annually, and $1.5 billion in health costs.

In particular teenage and low income smokers were price sensitive, he said.

The majority of the public supported increasing tobacco tax above inflation, the study found. Even most smokers supported the move providing additional revenue was used to fund measures to reduce smoking.

Currently less than 5 percent of the $1 billion tax revenue from cigarettes was put toward anti-smoking measures - far more should be used to help people quit and stop young people from starting, the researchers said.

"This help could include more prime-time mass media campaigns and greater Quitline capacity," Prof Edwards said.

"Tobacco tax increases targeted at helping people to quit have been successful here and overseas, and could help reduce harm to the health of New Zealanders due to smoking and reduce health inequalities."

The researchers said there had been relatively little reduction in smoking since 1991, despite measures such as banning smoking in bars and clubs and introducing graphic pack warnings, and New Zealand was out of step with other countries which had greater reduction in smoking through policies discouraging smoking.

The Scottish Parliament this week voted to end the display of cigarettes and tobacco products in shop as well as banning sales from vending machines in a bid to deter children from taking up the habit.

Labour Associate Health spokesperson Iain Lees-Galloway, who has drafted a private member's bill to ban smoking displays, applauded the move.

He called for the Government to address the issue and not wait for his bill to be drawn from the ballot.

"Governments around the world are taking this next logical step in the fight to reduce smoking rates. It's time we caught up."

NZPA

 

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

02 Feb 2010 04:34a.m.

me wrote:

yes.

29 Jan 2010 02:33p.m.

Mary wrote:

Firstly-if that is how you feel Ange please see your travel agent a.s.a.p.
Regarding smoking education-years ago I saw a ghastly anti-smoking film at school showing smokers' lungs along side those of non-smokers. !! EEK !!Being in a family of smokers is a weak excuse to justify smoking. My parents and 4 brothers ALL smoked. In the house,the car.It was dreadful. I've NEVER smoked.AND ALL smokers stink. Breath-hair-clothes.Don't kid yourselves that you don't. You reek.PLEASE try to give it up so that you can enjoy your childrens' successes and YOUR GRANDKIDS-FOR WHOM YOU are VERY IMPORTANT !!

29 Jan 2010 02:33p.m.

Mary wrote:

Firstly-if that is how you feel Ange please see your travel agent a.s.a.p.
Regarding smoking education-years ago I saw a ghastly anti-smoking film at school showing smokers' lungs along side those of non-smokers. !! EEK !!Being in a family of smokers is a weak excuse to justify smoking. My parents and 4 brothers ALL smoked. In the house,the car.It was dreadful. I've NEVER smoked.AND ALL smokers stink. Breath-hair-clothes.Don't kid yourselves that you don't. You reek.PLEASE try to give it up so that you can enjoy your childrens' successes and YOUR GRANDKIDS-FOR WHOM YOU are VERY IMPORTANT !!

29 Jan 2010 01:40p.m.

Boon wrote:

Yes and hope the Govt genuinely cares! I am only a casual smoker but feel I could only quit if it got banned. Tried to quit totally but temptation too great when offered it! NZ, take the lead!

29 Jan 2010 10:06a.m.

Richard wrote:

The ban should come in sooner! It's a filthy habit. One thing I hate is smokers who think that it's ok to blow smokein my face. Next one tht does it will get a punch in the face!

29 Jan 2010 09:59a.m.

Kiwi wrote:

There are 2 problems with this.

First social consience policy should be put to the country as a binding referendum, not forced onto the people by the government. Abortion, drugs, marriage and euthanasia to name a few are not things that should be decided by someone sat behind a desk all day.

Second, banning smoking would affect our tourism industry. Many many people smoke overseas and they are not going to want to visit a country where their freedom is prevented.

Personally I find smoking disgusting, but its not for me to tell someone else how to live. Remove them from dairies, hide them from shelves, restrict them to pharmacies (or liceansed specialist shops) if need be, raise the prices, and encourage people to stop.

29 Jan 2010 09:23a.m.

maurice wrote:

Being a 'Reformed' smoker ,I wish they could remove tobaco from this earth ...or at least ,licence the remaining smokers and barcoding the tobaco packets ,so they can be linked to the licence to control the missuse of tobaco and stop it from getting to our children ,i.e. if the young are caught with smokes then the packets can be traced to the purchaser and the said licence will be canceled

29 Jan 2010 08:49a.m.

Alien wrote:

I hate it how studies interview such a small amount of people then claim that it represented NZ. It would be insane to ban this as it would just create another underground market run by the gangs.

29 Jan 2010 08:33a.m.

Ange wrote:

hopefully i am out of this crappy country before that day comes. are they going to ban mc'donalds and booze too? doubt it.

29 Jan 2010 07:43a.m.

Alex wrote:

I see something wrong with the title of this article already. Less than 50% want smoking banned by 2020 which is hardly a majority consensus. I'm a non-smoker so it doesn't really affect me, but if the way the country moves forward by banning things and infringing upon human rights then this decade it then all hell with break lose by the time we reach 2020.