• Full Story

NZ's 10 acre dream 'fuelling transport issues'

Print

Tue, 29 Mar 2011 5:10a.m.

A expert says too many people in NZ travel long distances to work because they want to live in the city (file)

A expert says too many people in NZ travel long distances to work because they want to live in the city (file)

By Deanna Harris

Auckland’s traffic issues are under the spot light again and an environmental planning expert says it is New Zealand’s 10 acre dream which is fuelling the problem.

Waikato University professor of Environmental Planning, Bob Evans says New Zealand, like the world’s other prosperous economies, is continuing to pursue economic growth despite the long-term dangers.

“We’ve reached peak oil, there’s instability in the Middle East and demand is increasing, particularly in the booming economies of India and China. So we need to re-think how we plan and manage our cities,” he says.

Mr Evans has recently come to the Waikato from the UK where he was Director of the Sustainable Cities Research Institute at Northumbria University.

Mr Evans says New Zealand’s love of living in the country and single storey housing is using up vital natural resources and it will soon be unaffordable to drive long distances to work everyday.

After only a short time living in Hamilton he can already see transport problems are looming.

“Hamilton is sprawling and that means people here use their cars far more than they do in more compact cities. It seems to me on first impressions that people don’t walk so much here,” says Mr Evans.

“You’re not a big city but at rush hour you’re not far off gridlock in some places.”

He says that compared with the UK and other countries in Northern Europe, petrol is still relatively cheap in New Zealand, but that this won’t last.

“We need to deal with it now, before it becomes harder to deal with.”

He says it is not realistic for the public to drive the cultural change but the Government needs to work on the issue now.

Mr Evans says that New Zealand has a real chance to avoid the consequences of over-development and over-consumption that exist in Europe.

“New Zealand, with its small population, substantial renewable energy and natural resources, and stunning landscapes has a unique opportunity to secure a high quality of life for its people, sustainable for future generations.

“However, it will require some bold moves to change existing policy direction.”

The New Zealand Automobile Association has attacked the Auckland Council’s transport plans saying it will not be long until only the rich will be able to drive in New Zealand’s biggest city.

“The details of the Auckland spatial plan should be of concern to each and every motorist in Auckland,” says AA’s Auckland transport spokesperson, Simon Lambourne.

The plan proposes congestion charges, network access charges, a regional fuel tax, and levies on private parking spaces, as ways to pay for the Council’s public transport improvements.

These extra costs plus the rising cost of petrol will make private transport too expensive for many, says Mr Lambourne.

But a spokesman for Auckland Mayor Len Brown says this was one of many options being considered by the council.

There was nothing to suggest Auckland's motorists were being targeted, he said.

"We're at the start of a long consultation process about options for the new Auckland. We will be considering all options and it's very, very premature to suggest motorists are going to be targeted unfairly.”

Mr Evans says large cities similar to Auckland are having the same problem.

“Most cities of that size are having to invest in public transport and walking and cycling.”

Yesterday, problems were coming under scrutiny at the Intelligent Transport Systems summit.

The summit discussed how emerging technologies could improve road safety, reduce congestion and pollution while providing solutions and making best use of existing road infrastructure, ITS New Zealand president Deryk Whyte says.

Smart technology including car navigation, traffic signal control systems, variable message signs, automatic number plate recognition and speed cameras and advanced applications were all discussed.

3 News

 

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

29 Mar 2011 01:13p.m.

atrout wrote:

Right on Kelly... we produce all our produce needs from a very small part of our 10 acre block. Surplus goes to neighbours in our 'village' as does any other type of usable surplus. Around us there are farms which are being subdivided to 12 ha blocks (min allowable size). These blocks are going into single residence use... one house and max four occupants. Horses and kuni kuni pigs!!! Nobody eats either type of beast in this country so the land becomes nonproductive in Western terms. Good soil with pets playing on it. It take so little land to grow vegetables for a family but for beef, fowl and sheep meat a lot more is needed yet the demand for 10 acre blocks drives up land values to where pastoral farming becomes totally unaffordable so some form of badly thought out subdivision become inevitable. The same planners who try their level best to make coastal development impossible. All this for enviro/aesthetic reasons which have nothing to do with affordable housing and efficient land use. Fashionable environmentalists usually drive the planning process for the community and have no feeling for or understanding of appropriate land use for future generations. Loud lobbying for popular environmental themes does not result in good long term sustainability outcomes. The Green Party is totally useless in promoting genuine 'green' outcomes, being lost in a mess of social issues and symbols. We do need a new, smart Green Party in NZ. Oh, and can we share our 10 acre+ block with two or maybe three more self sufficient families??? No, the Council does not permit subdivision in our area due to high quality soil values. And yes, the cost of land is prohibitively high due to high demand and unavailability due to regulations. SO high quality land is leased out for a few freezer beef.

29 Mar 2011 11:44a.m.

david wrote:

The Air Car, developed by ex-Formula One engineer Guy Negre for Luxembourg-based MDI, uses compressed air, as opposed to the gas-and-oxygen explosions of internal-combustion models, to push its engine's pistons. Some 6000 zero-emissions Air Cars are scheduled to hit Indian streets by August 2010.

The Air Car, called the "MiniCAT" could cost around Rs. 3,475,225 ($8,177.00) in India and would have a range of around 300 km between refuels.

The cost of a refill would be about Rs. 85 ($2.00)

The MiniCAT which is a simple, light urban car, with a tubular chassis that is glued, not welded, and a body of fiberglass powered by compressed air. Microcontrollers are used in every device in the car, so one tiny radio transmitter sends instructions to the lights, indicators, etc.

There are no keys - just an access card which can be read by the car from your pocket. According to the designers, it costs less than 50 rupees per 100 Km (about a tenth that of a petrol car). Its mileage is about double that of the most advanced electric car (200 to 300 km or 10 hours of driving), a factor which makes a perfect choice in cities where 80% of motorists drive at less than 60 Km. The car has a top speed of 105 Kmph.

Refilling the car will, once the market develops, take place at adapted petrol stations to administer compressed air. In two or three minutes, and at a cost of approximately 100 rupees, the car will be ready to go another 200-300 kilometers.

29 Mar 2011 10:05a.m.

AndrewF wrote:

atrout has a point - we can learn a lot from the English model of rural villages where you aren't 100% reliant on your car for your daily necessities. The explosion in "mega" retail centres only increases the reliance on cars. And are we seeing increased public transport options as demand increases for such services? My experience says no. Bad bad planning.

29 Mar 2011 09:31a.m.

kelly wrote:

NZ is a decade behind Europe in pulling finger around transport issues. Driving will soon become unaffordable for most- it already IS unaffordable in a real sense, socially, environmentally and monetarily. Who can really afford their cars? Imagine how better off we would be without having to finance one. While I agree that greedy, rate-increasing zoning by venal local councils and wealthy dilettantes are largely to blame for this mess, I don't accept that smaller blocks don't have a part to play in say, market gardening and niche supply for these village type arrangements that atrout is talking about. The amount of produce I can grow on my urban half acre block is astonishing, for instance, and reduces the milage travelled by the food feeding my local area. We need to change the way we thinking about living and consuming per se; transport is a good, practical and far reaching place to start, but it must be reformed in tandem with so much else. I only wish we had politicians up to the challenge. We are very poorly served.

29 Mar 2011 09:13a.m.

Finn McCoull wrote:

If, at a guess, the AVERAGE ESSENTIAL car load is around 150Kg A good start might be a vehicle that weighs much less than an average of perhaps 1,500Kg. A vehicle governed to the legal speed limit and with controlled acceleration would be another. Pricing differentials will help but that will further divide society. A sensible personal transport vehicle is needed not more roads or central city high rise living. Now where's the keys to my Porsche ...

29 Mar 2011 08:16a.m.

atrout wrote:

It is about time that planners got off their their lofty ideals of protecting the land from their class enemies - the rich. The ridiculous cost of subdivision means that only the very wealthy can afford to subdivide. The planning rules mean that often the minimum size is 10 ha and very few people want such a large, sub economic size of block. Too small to generate a living and much too large to easily be manage by the average ex-city dweller. We have to start thinking again of the rural village with a number of small sections surrounded by farmland left intact and productive. Services would be viable in villages to the extent that some travel would be unecessary and some employment would be available. The current use of the RMA is poor as it doesn't easily allow for large scale planning of land use. Instead, the chardonnay socialist local government planners use it as an obstacle for innovative, small scale development. In terms that the planners might understand, some subdivision to create rural villages should be as a matter of right and the cutting up of viable farmland should be difficult, except where earlier,poor planning has created nonviable farm blocks too small for economic use, despite having high quality soils.