NZ's glaciers melting away - scientists

Print

NZ's glaciers melting away - scientists

3News NZ

NZ's glaciers have halved in size in the last century

NZ's glaciers have halved in size in the last century

By Lachlan Forsyth

On the eve of the Copenhagen climate summit, New Zealanders have been presented with dramatic evidence that we are not immune to climate change.

The country's glaciers are melting away according to a Niwa report that shows they have lost half of their snow and ice in the last century.

Scientists are warning the big glacier melt will continue.

It has long been known that the Tasman Glacier - the country's longest - is shrinking. But the latest information from Niwa shows virtually every other glacier in the country is doing likewise.

"We've seen about a 50 percent decrease in the ice volume of the Southern Alps," says Jordy Hendrikx, snow and ice scientist. "So if you were considering a health status, they've lost half of their health already."

Niwa says glacier length is misleading because total volume can be decreasing even while length is increasing. Their concerns surround the glaciers' mass balance - the snowfall required to replace the snow melt, and thereby maintain a glacier's size.

Since 1997, less snow has been falling and more ice has been melting. And since 2000, the southern glaciers have been below their tipping point - meaning that, apart from a small spike earlier this decade, the mass balance has declined sharply.

"That's a very slight warming over that time, and we're looking in the future that we're going to see continued warming and therefore continued ice loss," says Mr Hendrikx.

Worldwide it's not much better, the number of glaciers retreating now far outnumber those advancing - a huge turnaround since the late 1970s when advancing glaciers were the norm.

"The ends of our glaciers are just snapping off like chocolate and melting very rapidly, so we are losing a lot of ice mass very quickly," says climate scientist Jim Salinger.

Prime Minister John Key says he takes the demise of our glaciers seriously, just not seriously enough to attend Copenhagen himself.

"No, it doesn't prompt me to go to Copenhagen but it does show we need to take climate change seriously," he says.

Despite this, sceptics will claim there is still no evidence that climate change is caused by human activity.

"The physics of climate change are bloody obvious, which is if you put more greenhouse gases in the planet, it will warm," says Mr Salinger.

"Over the long period of time there's a clear trend that we're seeing a reduction in ice," says Mr Hendrikx. "It's undeniable that we have altered the atmosphere."

Man-made threat or not, there is no denying our famed glaciers may soon be in short supply.

3 News

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

9/12/2012 10:46:03 p.m.

Andrew wrote:

Why does 3 news even bother to make reference to climate deniers. That would be like talking about the curve of the earth and then mentioning that there are actually some nutters out there who still believe that the world is flat. It just distracts from the story. There will always be people who are simply too ignorant to understand simple concepts like climate change.

1/12/2009 8:43:25 p.m.

Winston smith wrote:

Nooooo the glaciers are melting in summer. That never happened before, I feel so guilty, where can I pay my carbon tax?

30/11/2009 5:16:50 p.m.

Fitzy wrote:

TV3 - Considering how much attention you've given supposed AGW Climate Change, isn't it ethical journalism to cover the view that AGW climate change may not be valid? As journalism goes isn't that the basis of ethical reporting? The Climategate story is the buzz of the internet, at the very less it deserves ten minutes of air time. Or you could always run a puff piece about a stomach stapling operation, or perhaps something cute about a three legged dog delivering newspapers, which looks like the future of traditional news media, given your Climategate coverage so far.

27/11/2009 6:45:42 p.m.

annon wrote:

Stop bagging NIWA!. WTF if this bunch of crooks want to blend the rules on whats science and whats politics then they have need get a real job. Dr Salinger was obviously a loose cannon!. Everyone at NIWA who thinks this is ok should resign now!.

27/11/2009 12:38:51 p.m.

Ric wrote:

@HeyMorons The world's scientific community is taking a very close look at NIWA's "science" in what the most widespread peer review of any New Zealand institution ever and its not pretty (see whatsupwiththat). This and climategate is todays news, not an alarmists point of view of nature taking its course.

27/11/2009 12:13:19 p.m.

Ric wrote:

Headsup TV3 - Breaking News. Google hits on the word "climategate" have gone from 0 to 7,100,000 in the course of one week. The longer you hold out the sillier you will look when you finally have no choice but to report the greatest scientific scandal of our time. Might like to take a peek at the fact that New Zealand's climate data is now under global scientific scrutiny since the rest of the world has been wised up to NIWA's pseudo-science in connection to same scandal.

26/11/2009 11:42:45 p.m.

HeyMorons wrote:

Stop bagging NIWA. They've already showed that the CLimate Science Coalition have no idea what they're on about. They put out a statement this afternoon explaining the temperature adjustments - it's not lies, it's science. If you paid attention to facts and not jsut the wingnuts out there, you'd know that.

26/11/2009 11:05:36 p.m.

annon wrote:

Maybe TV3 will have something on "Climategate" ask Dr Salinger onto a show with the NIWA puppets, and ask them for reasons why they needed to change the temperature record for NZ, Ask Alan Wishart to be there as well . Make sure you have a straight jacket for the nutjobs who start foaming at the mouth when they start lying!.

25/11/2009 4:02:28 p.m.

Obiwan wrote:

Glaciers have come and gone for millions of years - ice ages have come and gone - but is it a result of CO2 or the fact that the rainforests have been felled at alarming rates, thus limiting to absorption of CO2. There is no question in my mind that that is a fact, but to blindly put the blame on CO2 production could be stretching it. I accept that in the absence of good data, CO2 production should be halted at current levels (without penalties), reductions rewarded, but most importantly, the sum of world forests re-instated as the biggest priority. It is know for a very long time now that the world food production actually requires less land, as long as the best land is used for that. That means that there is plenty of room for re-forestation. That in its own will alter the world climate tremendously again. I am not advocating that man can just pollute at will, just caution, because there are already people becoming unduly wealthy re carbon trading - that means that others must be getting unduly poorer.

25/11/2009 12:43:20 p.m.

warren crossing wrote:

looking at the actual data sets and codes.. they seem to be using sunshine data to extrapolate cloud cover and then interchange cloud cover and precipitation almost effortlessly. I mean fair game I'm no meteorologist but it seems like they can trick the data reveal anything.. "Oh you didn't add the 'je ne sais quoi' coefficient? there.. that's better" The other thing they appear to be doing is comparing different places to show extreme average temp increases. We need a real scientific review (not by NIST) because it doesn't add up.