• Full Story

National announces welfare changes

Print

Tue, 01 Nov 2011 2:30p.m. UPDATED: 3:45PM

Paula Bennett

Paula Bennett

By Dan Satherley

The Government has revealed plans to dramatically shake up the welfare system.

Prime Minister John Key and Social Development Minister Paula Bennett made the announcement today in Hamilton.

Ms Bennett says the changes will get "46,000 people off welfare and another 11,000 working part-time within four years".

The current range of benefits will be consolidated into three main packages: Jobseeker Support, Sole Parent Support and Supported Living Payment.

Jobseeker Support will replace the Unemployment Benefit and the Sickness Benefit, for people whose youngest child is 14 or older.

"Everyone receiving the Jobseeker Support will be expected to be available for work, either full-time or part-time as their capacity allows," says Mr Key.

"The only exception will be for people who cannot work for the time being, because of sickness or injury, and who will therefore get a temporary exemption."

He says when children are 14 years old they can be left alone without supervision, so this is an appropriate age at which to force their parents to look for work.

The second new benefit, Sole Parent Support, is for solo parents.

"Sole parents on this benefit will have to be available for part-time work when their youngest child is five years old," says Mr Key.

If a parent on the Sole Parent Support benefit has another child, they will receive an exemption from looking for work – but only for another 12 months. So when the new child is a year old, the parent will be required to look for work.

"This support won’t be fully in place in year one, but will build up over time," says Mr Key.

The third benefit, Supported Living Payment, will replace the Invalids Benefit and benefits for people caring for others who'd otherwise be in hospital.

"People on the Supported Living Payment will not be expected to make themselves available for work," says Mr Key.

“This benefit is for those who’re unable to work at all and the name change reflects the fact the term ‘invalid’ for many, is offensive and outdated," says Ms Bennett.

"It will help to shift people’s attitudes and set genuinely different expectations about being available for work," says Mr Key.

The Green Party says the Government is backing "a loser" with the announcement.

“The way to get welfare numbers down is through a strong economy and good jobs,” says co-leader Metiria Turei.

“Importing hard-right welfare solutions that pay people to harass beneficiaries into low paid jobs is not the answer to a better or brighter future.

“National seem to spend far more of their time looking for ways to bully beneficiaries than actually worrying about creating jobs."

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

31 Mar 2012 12:43p.m.

Maria wrote:

Forcing parents to go back out and work when their child is only 12 months old is rediculous!!! a childs first 3 years is their development stage, they think child neglect is a prob now, wait till that comes in!!!It'll be the kids that suffer in the end
Oh sorry I had to go out and work, gotta feed my kid somehow, pffft the fuckin govt cunts needs to go on single beneficiaries incomes for a month, wont be enough to buy the shit paper they wipe their asses with!!.....

02 Nov 2011 10:17p.m.

David wrote:

@Clarke - that is the sickness and DPB, not the invalids benefit. You suggested that invalids (whom in this context implies invalids beneficiaries) are also facing a reduction in payments. This is false. Read my comment.

02 Nov 2011 10:07p.m.

Clarke wrote:

@Tam No Paula Bennetts new response to people like you is to starve you, make sure that you dont have money to clothe or selter your kids... until you comply to their expectations. In simpler terms, if you dont comply National will starve you children and ensure you have no money to clothe or shelter them. Personally I dont think starving children because their mothers dont comply with Winz regulations is on, its just National taking on the role of child abuser. I think that you should comply as best you can with winz rules, however I dont think Paula Bennett should be retaliating by taking away the money that you feed. clothe and shelter your kids with. And yes if Winz makes it look like you cant support your children cyfs may actually start taking children away from dpb mums. A vote for National is a vote for starving poor children.. what sort of redneck would do that exactly? punish the kid for the parents errors or mistakes or inability to do anything?.

02 Nov 2011 08:29p.m.

Tem wrote:

i am a single parent of 8 children, my first born is not living with me and i have to give my last born to my ex-partner... i would love to work... every year for the past 10 years, I was forced to go on a course that would help get a job, with my qualification from beginners to diploma in Business admin and computering, (still i do not qualified coz' i need 2years experience in the work force that will show good reference from my past employers... came off my part time job which i was employed for 4years as i had my baby this year)...at the moment i am labelled as a 'job seeker', i have three children who will go into health camp and i am using one child for 'child disability benefit' to help with the medication which i share between them, i get phone calls from their school or school nurse coz' of health issues and not reached the demands that winz have given me when i wanted a food grant etc and winz still want me to find a job... Question: in my situation (if you want my vote)i am forced to choose between loosing some of my benefit if i dont look for a job, which will give more problems of living cost or loose my children to sips course i couldnt stay home to look after them which then i will be labelled as an 'unfit parent' what do you want from me and the rules and regulations does not meet to the communities requirements?

02 Nov 2011 08:02p.m.

ayez wrote:

i think you hit the spt right on thea gary they just thinkn bowt how to make themselves richier i rekn

02 Nov 2011 07:58p.m.

aileen wrote:

how is this helping our country n look at what its going to do to alot of people epecially our children. whts national now saying all LETS MAKE THE RICHER RICHER n who worrys bowt every1 else,

02 Nov 2011 07:42p.m.

Clarke wrote:

@David You havent been watching the policy then David... I suggest you read the part of Nationals welfare policy that says.... Heres a direct quote if you like David. Ms Bennett says those on the DPB and sickness benefits can have their benefits cut by up to 50% if they do not look for work - but benefits will be reinstated as soon as recipients comply with Work and Income requests. Heres a exert from the NZherald "sanctions in the form of cuts to payments would apply if beneficiaries did not meet their obligations." So National intends to starve the kids of these mums if they dont comply. Read the policy releases please david, before saying something that isnt happening.. when it really is.

01 Nov 2011 11:17p.m.

solomumwithfivekidz wrote:

After internalising a very complicated situation in my head and having focused my point of view regarding National Parties Social Welfare Policy....quite simply all I can say is "that'll do JohnKEY, that'll do!!".
Further I totally agree that KEY has lost this election and that he is Far, Far Away from a better and brighter future!!

01 Nov 2011 08:46p.m.

Tracy Stockman wrote:

I fully support this proposed change to the current welfare system, why should people already receiving government support have more children? I fully support single parents receiving assistance from the government but they should not have more children when they need help to look after the ones they have.

01 Nov 2011 08:41p.m.

Stu wrote:

Where are these jobs that Key keeps promising. Didn't he say about 43000 extra jobs per year.? All I can see all the time is Firms closing down and more jobs lost. Im presently doing a cleaning job which NO THANKS TO BLOODY KEY is paying me $7.40 per hour in the hand far less than minimum wage and KEY still wants to benefit bash yet again. I agree with others that those at the top get all the breaks and those at bottom get less. And Employers get away paying less than minimum wage. This was a job through the [Nazis ] WINZ and they dont care a stuff about being less than minimum wage. With that and the RENA disaster we definitely need to get rid of Key. The dirty Tricks Key are up to keep turning up. Read the following about the Pike mine. http://groups.google.com/group/globalsov/browse_thread/thread/8032317680d45853 Then see what Key is up to destroying all those lives.