• Full Story

National plans crack down on benefit fraud

Print

Tue, 15 Nov 2011 2:23p.m.

Paula Bennett

Paula Bennett

A crackdown on benefit fraud, and cancelling benefits for drug users and wanted persons, have been unveiled as part of National's sweeping welfare reform proposals.

National says its welfare obligations policy, released on Tuesday, will save the taxpayer more than $200 million over four years.

A new team of fraud specialists and investigators will tackle welfare fraud and help recover assets, at a cost of $600,000 a year.

The party's also promising more information-sharing between departments to catch beneficiaries who are working or using false identities, and a review of the Social Security Act to ensure people in relationships aren't claiming benefits they're not entitled to.

People who don't apply for a job because a potential employer asks them to take a drug test, or who fail a pre-employment drug test, will have their benefit cancelled - as will anyone with a warrant out for their arrest.

The latest policy announcement is part of National's pledge to get up to 46,000 people off welfare and into full-time work within four years.

It includes replacing the unemployment and sickness benefits with a new Jobseeker Support benefit, which will also cover sole parents whose children are aged over 14.

Recipients will have to be available for work, unless they get a temporary exemption.

A new Sole Parent Support benefit will replace the Domestic Purposes Benefit, and recipients will be expected to be available for part-time work when their youngest child is school-age, and for full-time work when their youngest child turns 14.

National anticipates the welfare shake-up will save $1 billion over four years.

NZN

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

21 Nov 2011 12:01p.m.

Laurek wrote:

It should also save millions from the 150,000 that have left the country due to noting policies in a no economy zone.

20 Nov 2011 05:48p.m.

eddie wrote:

Love the 'lefties' crying and moaning on here...National 50%+...Labour under 30%...you know why?...Labour extending WFF to beneficieries and disagreeing with the above, as it's National policy...if Goff was suggesting the above you would all be for it!...lol, clowns and idiots the lot of you.

9yrs of opposition, at least

16 Nov 2011 03:44p.m.

Tallica1 wrote:

About bloody time this sort of action was taken. Can't believe criminals on the run would still get a benefit! Time to put a stop to this and also those druggies who are using benefit money to fund their drug addiction instead of on essentials. Vote National!

16 Nov 2011 09:10a.m.

Tinnie man wrote:

Drug testing benes would be easier than testing govt employees. There would be a massive debacle with WINZ and CYF employees being sacked on mass. Many of the tinnie / P houses round these ways are propped up by the custom of local CYF workers, some of them are even running them / allowing partners relatives to run them from their homes. Should a stoned social worker be making decisions to ignore notifications on drugged and violent dads ???

16 Nov 2011 06:55a.m.

Homer wrote:

Nationals answer to the unemployment problem is to attack the small percentage ripping us off. This is only a small percentage and isn't going to fix our problems. I have not seen anything from them to address the bigger issue of the lack of work for people. Nats have their heads buried in the sand. The attitude of winz towards people on a benefit is bad enough, this is going to make it a hell of a lot worse. Expect the suicide rate to rise.

15 Nov 2011 09:34p.m.

Kim wrote:

If they are ethical at all they will complement this policy with random alcohol tests for MP when they are in the house. I would prefer a druggie serving me in a shop (obviously not all shops) than a pisshead making laws that can effect peoples lives negatively... One law for them another for us again.

15 Nov 2011 08:18p.m.

me wrote:

LOLOLOLOL. Sry Nat voters but best you up your security now, crime is going to sky-rocket. I got $206 this wk, rent alone is 200. I literally have no milk, bread or petrol and payday is Thurs. I couldn't get to a job interview tomorrow unless it was walking distance. My power was going to be cut last wk so 100 went straight to the power company. I have NEVER had my power or phone cut off! I am in more financial shit than I have EVER been in since Nat got in. No light at the end of this tunnel that I can see... show me a job and I'll take it! Although I can't see it helping much since the minimum wage is going to be dropped by National

15 Nov 2011 08:15p.m.

Alex wrote:

Expect this to be a vote buying policy especially if Paula Bennett is stupidly appointed Social Development minister again

15 Nov 2011 06:56p.m.

Aron wrote:

I find Labours welfare reforms far more productive and positive i would rather see Beneficiaries be taken up for apprenticeships with there employers subsidized with the welfare payments. But i do agree with drugs no welfare its fair enough but National are just being national!! When it comes to election time dam those Beneficiaries.

15 Nov 2011 06:20p.m.

Keith wrote:

Key says that people ripping off the system need dealt with. Thats fine but does it apply to the banksters currency traders and other white collar people ripping off ordinary investors and costing the country. All very well wanting every body in employment but johnny show us the jobs. Once again just hollow words from a hollow man