3News » Home
Full Story

Controversy grows over seaside stall

6 comments | Post Comment Email Print Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
Mr Laird said many people arrived at the beach, hot and bothered, with no food or water Mr Laird said many people arrived at the beach, hot and bothered, with no food or water
Wed, 30 Dec 2009 3:23p.m.

Controversy over a seaside stall on the country's most photographed beach continues to grow as the stall owner says tourists are happy he is there but locals want to send him packing.

Shanan Laird, 31, has set up a stall on the beach at Cathedral Cove, billed as one of the most spectacular beaches in the country and accessible only by boat or a 30-minute walk.

Mr Laird said tourists loved to see his stall, licensed by the Department of Conservation for a seven-week trial, once they reached the cove after a 30-minute trek in.

Other tourist operators, including boat charters, outside the cove, said a visit to Cathedral Cove was one of many "must-see" attractions on the Coromandel Peninsula.

Mr Laird said rather than spoiling the pristine cove, as he had been accused of by locals, he was leaving it in better condition than when he arrived.

He said he had had mostly positive feedback from visitors with only two negative comments from locals, since he began selling drinks and sandwiches.

Mr Laird said many people arrived at the beach, hot and bothered, with no food or water.

"All the tourists are just so happy that someone is there with water because they didn't realise the walk was so difficult," he said.

He took a table by boat to the cove each day and offered basic first aid, sunblock, snorkels, drinks and sandwiches to beachgoers, The New Zealand Herald said today.

Under his deal with DOC he had to clean the beach of all rubbish before he left each day.

Locals claimed they were not consulted and the licence could open the floodgates to hawkers.

The Green Party's conservation spokesman, Kevin Hague, said he would mount a challenge to the decision to grant Mr Laird the concession, "particularly, to do so without public input, which was scandalous.

"We rely on the department to conserve the values of places that are important to us, and I have yet to come across any permanent or part-time resident here who thinks this commercial venture has any role to play with this place we all love and value enormously," he said.

Mr Hague, who has a family bach at nearby Hahei, accused the Government of compromising the country's heritage by cutting funds to DOC and said its indifference to conservation and to New Zealand's natural environment was completely at odds with how New Zealanders felt.

NZPA

Comments [6]

ross williams
31 Dec 2009 4:12p.m.

seems to me that the locals think that they own the beach and would like to only let their own friends on to it watch out picnicers they will stop you takeing your chilly bin down next mabey thay wont to clean up the beach them selves?

Dee
31 Dec 2009 1:57p.m.

I too live overseas but do not believe NZ needs to mimic other countries No to the stall. DOC get it right preserve the beauty of our whenua. We do not want then at Cape Rienga we do not need them on the Coromandel.

Mackie
31 Dec 2009 10:11a.m.

This guy pays to be there,and cleans up the beach,which would otherwise be cleaned up by DOC staff,at a cost to you..Us.. personally I think its most likely cleaner now he is there than before,surely DOC doesn't send a worker there every day,just to clean the beach of rubbish...This is a great idea,good on you DOC.

natural nz
30 Dec 2009 11:54p.m.

Is this what the future holds for some of Aotearoa's iconic coastlines and beaches??? That i guess is what everyone wonders?..... Personally i prefer to keep it all to a minimum... Once you start crossing certain lines where does the line finish?...

Simon
30 Dec 2009 8:49p.m.

Yeah I agree, as long as he leaves the beach clean and tidy, let him go for it.Too many knockers in this country.

katrina
30 Dec 2009 6:28p.m.

Give the guy a break, people are always quick to knock someone who is enterprising. He leaving the beach cleaner than before. Would you rather he was on the dole? Sounds like he has gone through all the right channels and can not be accused of being a hawker. As long as they limit it to one stand.

Post a comment

Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:


3News Video 3News Audio

Post your opinion

3News - Adrian Leason, Peter Murnane, Samuel Land each faced charges relating to the damage of Waihopai spy base (NZPA)
Comments (39)

Waihopai acquittal: dangerous precedent or sensibility prevailing?

Three peace activists walked free Wednesday even though they admitted breaking into a Government spybase near Blenheim....