Herald defends publishing SAS photos - Story - National - 3 News
3News » Home

Herald defends publishing SAS photos

35 comments | Post Comment Email Print Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
UDPATED: 6:10PM Thu, 21 Jan 2010 4:52p.m.

Soldier hero Willie Apiata is unlikely to return soon to New Zealand despite his identity being revealed as one of the army's elite Special Air Service (SAS) soldiers in Afghanistan.

Apiata was photographed on the streets of Afghanistan capital Kabul after Taliban gunmen and suicide bombers attacked the city this week.

The New Zealand soldiers were helping Afghanistan forces restore and keep order.

The photograph of a bearded Apiata and another New Zealand soldier was taken by photographer Philip Poupin and published in The New Zealand Herald today.

Apiata's identity was confirmed by Prime Minister John Key, but he said no decision had been made on whether the two soldiers would leave Afghanistan now.

"I think it's unlikely that Willie Apiata would return to New Zealand before the end of this rotation. At the end of the day, people knew he was in the SAS and there was always the chance people might take the view that he might be back there," he said.

With the notable exception of Apiata, the army fiercely protects the identities of its elite SAS troops to prevent them from becoming special targets - but there is no law preventing the news media from publishing or broadcasting images.

Instead the media has observed an unwritten convention, refraining from identifying SAS personnel.

The acting editor of the Herald wouldn't be interviewed on camera, but told 3 News the photograph was published because it was in a public place, and the only reason the paper hadn't already published identifiable pictures of the SAS in action was because it had never before had the opportunity.

The British news media are legally prevented from identification of special forces troops, but there is no plan for a similar system here.

"I don't think we would go that far… and we'd obviously actively encourage the media to show editorial discretion and to be sensible about what pictures they publish, because these are the real lives of New Zealanders that we're concerned about," says Mr Key.

"Certainly if he wanted to come home now, we would allow him to.

"He's probably the most high profile New Zealand member of the SAS and his face has been plastered across the world's media.

"When we sent the SAS back to Kabul, it was always going to be a much more high profile deployment. On that basis, they were much more likely to be seen and to be photographed. We were aware of that when we made that decision but we were comfortable with it.

"A high level of secrecy around the SAS is needed. The Taliban and al Qaeda were always aware they were there so there was no secret that the New Zealand SAS were in Kabul. But we don't want them to know the names and individual identities of members of the SAS because of the nature of some of their operations, and they would be at a greater risk if they can be identified," Mr Key added.

The publication of the photograph put Apiata's life and the lives of other SAS soldiers at risk, he said.

Mr Key said it was a poor editorial decision by the Herald.

"I'm very disappointed about The New Zealand Herald's decision to publish the photograph of New Zealand SAS soldiers. It would have been preferable if they'd taken a decision to black out their faces," he told reporters in Auckland today.

"People were aware that Willie Apiata chose to stay on in the SAS, that was a decision he made after he was awarded the Victoria Cross, and the quite considerable publicity that he got as a result of that tremendous honour.

"We gave Willie Apiata the choice about whether or not he wanted to return to Afghanistan, and he made it quite clear that he did want to return and was one of the first to go back to Afghanistan," Mr Key said.

He added that he thought Apiata and the other soldier pictured would be aware that the photographs had been published.

He said there had been considerable discussions with the New Zealand Defence Force today.

3 News / NZPA

Comments [35]

Senna
28 Jan 2010 2:24p.m.

Now that its public knowledge he's operating there, we have brought unwanted attention to his unit and to the man himself. The comments made by the edotor of the Dominion after publishing the photograph showing his face are absolute rubbish, As an ex soldier with the NZDF I fail to believe soldiers currently serving or otherwise who have an understanding of Spec Operations would want Special ops covered openly.

Mike
23 Jan 2010 3:59p.m.

Mr Key said "it was a poor editorial decision by the Herald". And I say it was a very poor Prime Ministerial decision to actually confirm Cpl Apiata's identity when up until John Key named him he was actually just an anonymous solider in a photo. Good job Don Key!
Now the latest from Don Key is that he was briefed by his press secretary that it was Cpl Apiata and when asked by the media if it was him, he confirmed it was because he "didn't want to lie". Now that is a lie if ever I heard one. The truth is our PM stuffed up big time and is now scuttling around trying not to ridiculous having blown a hole through our military security. He is a fool.

Andrew
22 Jan 2010 6:52p.m.

Selection is an operational/command issue, Anrath.

Doug
22 Jan 2010 10:58a.m.

Anrath mate, you've been watching too much Rambo.
If you believe the Govt picks out the troops, do you also believe they pick out the staff in our hospitals? and teachers in our schools?
You are one deluded fool.

ash
22 Jan 2010 10:02a.m.

I have never written on these comment sections before but I am so disgusted in the attitude of the NZ Herald to the response they have received to their publishing of images showing the faces of elite forces in a combat zone. No photograph of any of these SAS troops should be shown. Their considered decision not only unduly compromises the safety of the individuals in the immediate actions they are involved with but can compromise their use in future actions. British SBS troops were photographed during their deployment to East Timor and were show in the British media. This had immediate and far reaching impact for the individuals shown. “The acting editor of the Herald wouldn't be interviewed on camera, but told 3 News the photograph was published because it was in a public place, and the only reason the paper hadn't already published identifiable pictures of the SAS in action was because it had never before had the opportunity.” It was in a public place! Not only was it in a public place, it was in one of the most dangerous public places in the world right now. Their ‘choice’ (while they sat here in their safe comfortable office) to print that image has just made it more dangerous for those individuals not there by ‘choice’ but by a brave and honourable sense of duty. Their decision has no honour and no defence. The decision makers can surely not deny, they knew publishing this image would make these SAS members individually identifiable and therefore more of a target. To say that they made that decision because “they never had the opportunity before” is one of the most disgusting comments I have heard. I hope they learn from the response of the country that we as the consumers of their product do not want to see this irresponsible use of ‘opportunity’ again.

ash
22 Jan 2010 10:02a.m.

I have never written on these comment sections before but I am so disgusted in the attitude of the NZ Herald to the response they have received to their publishing of images showing the faces of elite forces in a combat zone. No photograph of any of these SAS troops should be shown. Their considered decision not only unduly compromises the safety of the individuals in the immediate actions they are involved with but can compromise their use in future actions. British SBS troops were photographed during their deployment to East Timor and were show in the British media. This had immediate and far reaching impact for the individuals shown. “The acting editor of the Herald wouldn't be interviewed on camera, but told 3 News the photograph was published because it was in a public place, and the only reason the paper hadn't already published identifiable pictures of the SAS in action was because it had never before had the opportunity.” It was in a public place! Not only was it in a public place, it was in one of the most dangerous public places in the world right now. Their ‘choice’ (while they sat here in their safe comfortable office) to print that image has just made it more dangerous for those individuals not there by ‘choice’ but by a brave and honourable sense of duty. Their decision has no honour and no defence. The decision makers can surely not deny, they knew publishing this image would make these SAS members individually identifiable and therefore more of a target. To say that they made that decision because “they never had the opportunity before” is one of the most disgusting comments I have heard. I hope they learn from the response of the country that we as the consumers of their product do not want to see this irresponsible use of ‘opportunity’ again.

cynical
22 Jan 2010 8:42a.m.

Time to change your medication, Anrath.

Kerry
22 Jan 2010 6:13a.m.

Anrath you couldnt be further from the truth. I have had the privilage of serving my country on three different operational deployments. Two of them under the Labour Government and I bet Helen Clarke or the then Minister of Defence didnt have a clue what my name was.

Willie Apiata is part of a team that lives, eats and breaths New Zealand. Everything they do, they do at 110% and when the chips are down they will put their bodies on the line for their team mates and their country. Willie Apiata has already proven this. Their shroud of secrecy is one of the main tools they have that allows them to operate at the level they do. This newspaper has just opened the door for this shroud to be pushed aside.

The fact that an independant photographer took photos of a team of soldiers is irrelevant, all war zones are crawling with independants. The fact that a New Zealand newspaper has those photos is also irrelevant. The fact that they chose to publish those photos knowing full well that those soldiers were NZSAS troopers and that those troopers are still standing on the front line was totally irresponsible.

So as for your comment on me not knowing much about war and reconisance, I beg to differ and as for corupt politicians, after the 2005 Boxing day Tsunami I spent a year in Indonesia working as a logistics coordinator for a major aid agency. I assure you I learnt alot about corupt politicains there.

Jenny
22 Jan 2010 12:29a.m.

I'm pleased to see that for a change, everyone who has posted a comment is actually on the same page. Condemnation to the Herald editor who went with publishing this photo without blurring our guys' faces. I don't care that the item & photo were so news-worthy. These guys need discretion & it was blown by the Herald. Mind you, the PM naming him didn't help either, unless the PM was pre-empting something by id'g him now. But still, very disappointing to see NZ media/PR being so naive. The NZ SAS are the guys.. I wish you safety & good health.

Anrath
21 Jan 2010 11:34p.m.

You never read alien you just jump ahead a mile.

I said the government would have been given a list of names.

Not that they chose who went.

The Ministers would have been aware of Apiata's prestige, and one would have thought on a covert mission that you wouldnt do something like this.

The minister does have the power to over rule the heads of each branch of the defence force.

Perhaps you need to learn to read and comprehend what is being said.

Post a comment

Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:


3News Video 3News Audio

Post your opinion

3News - Adrian Leason, Peter Murnane, Samuel Land each faced charges relating to the damage of Waihopai spy base (NZPA)
Comments (14)

Waihopai acquittal: dangerous precedent or sensibility prevailing?

Three peace activists walked free Wednesday even though they admitted breaking into a Government spybase near Blenheim....