Navy should watch whalers, says Labour

Print

Wed, 05 Oct 2011 10:40p.m.

Japan has announced it will toughen security around its whaling fleet (Reuters)

Japan has announced it will toughen security around its whaling fleet (Reuters)

Opposition parties are calling on the government to send navy ships to the Southern Ocean where another bitter battle between Japanese whalers and protesters looks set to break out.

Japan has announced it will toughen security around its whaling fleet in response to the promise of dramatic attacks by anti-whaling group Sea Shepherd.

Foreign Affairs Minister Murray McCully is urging Japan not to send its whaling fleet this summer, saying the decision to do so is "entirely disrespectful" of strong concerns held by Australians and New Zealanders.

Labour and the Greens don't think that's enough, and both parties said on Wednesday that navy ships should be sent to monitor the situation.

"New Zealanders don't like sitting on the sidelines when bad things are happening," Labour's foreign affairs spokeswoman Maryan Street said.

"Labour believes there is a case for New Zealand naval vessels to be sent to monitor activities."

The Greens said offshore patrol ships should be sent.

"The government says it is committed to saving the whales but doesn't have the courage to commit any resources to do so," Greens oceans spokesman Gareth Hughes said.

In Japan, Fisheries Minister Michihiko Kano said on Tuesday that measures would be taken to ensure the whalers' safety, and that this year's hunt would go ahead.

"We intend to carry out the research after enhancing measures to assure that it is not obstructed," he said.

The hunt is expected to begin in December.

Sea Shepherd successfully disrupted last season's efforts and says the Japanese whalers obtained only 17 per cent of their quota due to direct action by the group.

Earlier this week, it announced plans to send 100 volunteers to the Southern Ocean and warned they were prepared to lose lives if necessary.

"They will have to kill us to prevent us from intervening once again," Sea Shepherd leader Captain Paul Watson said.

Mr McCully said he was alarmed by Mr Watson's statements and urged both parties not to put lives or the Antarctic environment at risk.

In Australia, the federal government condemned Japan's whaling program in a statement released on Tuesday.

"Australia remains resolute in its opposition to all commercial whaling, including Japan's so-called 'scientific whaling'," the join statement issued by Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd, Attorney General Robert McClelland and Environment Minister Tony Burke said.

But Capt Watson dismissed the comments.

"It is all just talk," he told AAP from the United States.

"Unless they send a boat down there and escort the Japanese fleet out of there they are not doing anything," he said.

Australian Greens leader Bob Brown said the Australian navy and federal police should be involved in pursuing and investigating Japanese whalers.

NZN

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

15 Nov 2011 08:36p.m.

atrout wrote:

@ Melissa Grinter Have you never eaten a tuna sandwich? How about fish (rig) and chips? And why couldn't you farm Kiwi and go up against KFC? So by saying that the government must take political action against the whalers, do you mean that NZ Naval ships should go down South and become involved in the whaling protest? In what form - direct involvement or observer? Direct involvement would be illegal and dangerous. Observing would be useless, especially since the whaling passes for being legal and doesn't involve endangered species. Be a little more specific and tell us what our government should be doing.

10 Oct 2011 07:51p.m.

Melissa Grinter wrote:

Please. Come to your scenes. Whales are not a resource to be abused. Nor are Tuna. Nor are sharks. Nor are elephants. Nor are kiwi. However, they are abused and numbers of species continues to diminish. Please, if you see fit remind me, why is this alright? While not a vegan or a vegetarian, I believe that all animals have the right to dignity and respect. Hauling them up and killing them slowly does not achieve this. Many species of whales are in fact on the threatened and endangered list, so why do we as people only see fit to stop hunting a species when they get to this vital level? Are humans not theoretically meant to learn from our historical mistakes? From my understanding, whales, like sharks, are a delicacy. How is this an essential resource for humanities survival? While statements protestors self sacrifice seems irrational to me also, it seems to me that people view this as a time calling for desperate measures. New Zealanders live in a country which relies on our natural resources for survival; living, breathing and breeding whales are a large part of this. Without whales, and other threatened species within the oceanic the world, our very existence is threatened. Eco-systems rely on the survival and evolution of every species. Political action is a must from our government if we are to further protect another species from the threat of human greed.

10 Oct 2011 07:33p.m.

Davo wrote:

Well, hey, why not? That's all our navy is good for these days anyway.

09 Oct 2011 10:36a.m.

Jimmi wrote:

Perhaps the Japanese Navy should be there protecting their Fishing boats from the Terrorist threat of Greenpeace and their affiliated Terror cells. Minke whales (harvested by Japan) are the most abundant baleen whale. It is estimated that there are about 800,000 to 1 million minke whales world-wide, whales should not be allowed to recover to environmental carrying capacity, but rather, are in need of culling in the name of ecosystem management. Whales eat at least ten target species hunted by people, including Japanese anchovy and Pacific saury. Whales and dolphins worldwide consume 300 to 500 million tons of marine food annually, three to six times the amount fished for total human consumption. In light of globally diminishing fish stocks and increasing human population ,whales are like a rat in the pantry. So before all you ignorant, emotionally weak greenies out there criticise the Japanese, learn the facts.

06 Oct 2011 08:57p.m.

James wrote:

Torpedo the mother ship, End of problem

06 Oct 2011 04:52p.m.

David wrote:

Genocide?? really? We are talking about animals here. Do you refer to someone spraying flies as genocide? whales are a natural resource, and if we don't want them then we can at least let someone else who wants them to take them.

06 Oct 2011 04:42p.m.

Scott wrote:

New Zealand and Australia need to approach this issue in a new way. Condemning Japan has not and is unlikely to work. The Japanese government and many Japanese people see whaling as an issue of national identity. Japan is a country that hasn't been able to run its own foreign policy since WW2, and whaling is seen as one issue where they can chart their own course. New Zealand and Australia should negotiate with Japan instead of trying to impose our own values. We should recognise commercial whaling. In return Japan should stop subsidising the whaling industry and cease hunting endangered whale species.

06 Oct 2011 01:30p.m.

Chevy wrote:

Well you're Japanese so you wouldn't understand anyway. The navy would go out to ensure that the Japanese aren't breaking the law (which they are and everyone knows it) We just need proof. "Scientific research" YEAH RIGHT..
And good on the so-called eco-terrorists, I'm pretty sure if the Japanese whaling boats had their way they would be a lot more violent. We aren't just gonna sit by and do nothing.

06 Oct 2011 01:19p.m.

Hamish wrote:

Mr Toyotomi, to NZers this whale harvest is fairly disgusting and reflects very badly on all Japanese, it amounts to genocide of an intelligent species. If you dont like this attitude you know where the airport is.
Ps, I know this hunt is not popular with all Japanese.

06 Oct 2011 12:42p.m.

kiwi wrote:

Wait and see, no need for assumptions atm