• Full Story

New Chinese buyer wants Crafar farms

Print

Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:07p.m.

(file)

(file)

Shanghai real-estate mogul Jiang Zhaobai - wants to buy the Crafar family farms from receivers - predicts a bright future for food producers.

"China ... is already a significant market for New Zealand, but offers huge and exciting future potential for mutally-beneficial cooperation," he said today.

"We have great admiration for the New Zealand dairy industry and its potential and believe we can be a strong ally for New Zealand dairy industries through out international trade connections, and, in particular, our networks of influence within China and Asia.

"We have a role in helping New Zealand capitalise on this opportunity."

The receivers for the Crafar family's four companies said today that a sales agreement with another Chinese-backed investor had been withdrawn, and it now had a new offer from Mr Jiang's company, Shanghai Pengxin International Group Ltd.

"We have accepted an offer from Pengxin International Group Ltd," said one of the receivers, Brendon Gibson of KordaMentha. "It's the best offer we have."

The receivers were now waiting on Overseas Investment Office approval, which was expected in March.

Mr Gibson said the receivers no longer had a deal with the previous group of Chinese investors, who were using a mining company rebranded as Natural Dairy NZ Holdings Ltd to buy the farms through a New Zealand company, UBNZ Funds Management Ltd.

Two cabinet ministers, Maurice Williamson and Kate Wilkinson last year declined consent for Natural Dairy's application because they were not satisfied that all the individuals with control of Natural Dairy were of good character.

Natural Dairy tried to protect its deal earlier this month by pushing the terms of settlement for the purchase of 16 farms in receivership out to September 30 this year. It told the Hong Kong stock exchange that its advisers needed time to consider the rejection of its bid.

"Although the applications were declined by the ministers, the company is considering sourcing the milk and manufacturing the finished dairy products in New Zealand for export into the Asia market," the company said.

Shanghai Pengxin said today that it would make a full disclosure of its plans when it lodges its OIO application in March: "We look forward to sharing our plans with dairy industry leaders and the public."

Its total assets were about $US2 billion ($NZ2.58 billion), in property development, infrastructure, mining and agriculture, said Mr Jiang, whose net worth with his brother Jiang Lei is reported by Forbes magazine to be $US670 million.

Mr Jiang grew up in a farming village in Nantong, but has ridden the wave of China's economic boom, starting his first business in 1988, the Seattle Times reported last year when he visited looking for American companies focusing on newly emerging technology.

His company owns 650 hectares of farmland near Shanghai, used for sheep, wheat and soybeans, and has another 930ha in Shandong Province for a sheep farm.

In 2005, the company invested more than $US20m in a Bolivian soybean and corn farm. It had agricultural interests in Cambodia and Argentina, and was negotiating to buy 200,000 hectares of land in Brazil to grow soybeans and cotton.

NZPA

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

05 Feb 2011 03:32a.m.

Bill Simpson wrote:

If you let them, the Chinese communist will buy all of New Zealand. They need good farmland, timberland, mines, and economic leverage to increase migration for eventually political control of your country. They have more than enough money to do it. At least they won't get you for free, like poor Tibet. Ask a Tibetan how nice they are. You will see the real China as soon as Uncle Sam goes bankrupt and their navy goes the way of the Russian navy after 1989.

29 Jan 2011 10:24p.m.

Jodie wrote:

We are only allowed to lease land in China so only fair that they lease here. At least if something bad happens within company the owner of the land would still be able to stop development or whatever might be in mind for land. Remember, people will only keep a business going if it is making them money and if it isn't they aren't going to think about the greater needs of a country if they have no ties to it or pressure from a public that they don't have to live amongst.

29 Jan 2011 04:48p.m.

Wolfman wrote:

Why sell the land to overseas interests, what is wrong with leasing it to them, at least then it still remains NZ Property. If these overseas companies are so keen on farming, they would agree to this, but I fear their motives are far more wide spread than this, especially as this company is primarily a property developer.

29 Jan 2011 11:31a.m.

katrina wrote:

I think the best interests of NZ would be served by them buying the business but leasing the land. We don't care you owns the business as long as it is well run and they make efforts to have an environmental conscience. Large pockets of land like that should remain in NZ ownership though.

28 Jan 2011 12:52p.m.

dave schu wrote:

Robbie is correct. The processes of globalisation can't be halted and there is no room for a xenophobic NZ in the global economy. I believe the Overseas Inv. Office will make a fair decision based on the facts and merits of the bid.

28 Jan 2011 11:57a.m.

David Jacobs wrote:

I sincerely hope that the IOI conducts a thorough in-depth investigation into this company and its directors before making any decisions.
Having made many statements about the previous offer from the NZ Natural group, and Mae Wang in particular, I would be sorely disappointed if the new offer was from a "pump and dump" company. We have many agencies in China, so now is the time for them to earn their salt and do some serious investigating on our behalf.

28 Jan 2011 09:44a.m.

robbie wrote:

David - people like you really scare me! The world is now irrevearsably linked through financial investment and trade - wake up and accept and grow with that. Did the American govt. nationalize the packaging industry when Graham Hart made his move?

28 Jan 2011 02:09a.m.

David wrote:

Nationalize them.