New education standards announced

Print

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:33a.m.

John Key

John Key

New education standards to be introduced next year, tracking a student's progress and reporting it to their parents, were released today.

The Government is to spend $36 million over four years to support schools' implementation of the standards.

Under the standards, parents would twice a year receive school reports on their childrens' progress.

The standards focus on detailed areas that teachers would be expected to test students against at each school level.

For example, after one year at school, students would read The Way it Was by Dot Meharry.

They would then be expected to answer questions from the teacher and provide additional information on the story, such as the use of different colours in the illustrations or the way time difference was depicted.

Teachers would use a variety of assessment activities when they wrote reports and may use samples of students' work.

Students would not be compared to others -- assessment would measure only their progress and achievement against the national standards.

Education Minister Anne Tolley said the standards would be introduced in all English-based primary and intermediate schools and would involve years one to eight.

"If students have these foundation skills in literacy and numeracy they will be able to learn across all areas of the school curriculum and will be on track to get at least NCEA level 2," she said.

"I'm delighted for the first time (parents) will now have information on what their children should be able to achieve and by when."

Prime Minister John Key said the standards were supported by parents, would lift achievement standards and provide "clear signposts" on a child's progress.

One in five students was being left behind and they needed to be identified so they could receive the help they needed, he said.

"Parents want, and deserve, clear information on how their children are doing at school."

Parents could not intervene if they did not know there was a problem, Mr Key said.

"In order to succeed our children must have the very best educational opportunities. National standards will help realise those opportunities."

NZEI president Frances Nelson said it was "problematic" that teachers' and principals' first look at the standards was at the end of the year.

"We now need time to study them very closely and see how they're going to fit alongside everything else we do."

NZPA
Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

01 Feb 2010 12:33p.m.

Seme wrote:

Yeah everyone seems to put the blame on teachers. Why don't we(parents) ask ourselves ...."what should we do to help our children?" Just something to think about....

23 Oct 2009 10:08p.m.

Kathy wrote:

David, In the most part I agree with you but I don't think that primary school pupils are in any position to make an informed choice about their destiny - this is a critical stage where they need to master the basics to equip them with their "toolbox" for life. Indeed it will be sorrowful if we stifle the creativity of our budding Motzarts; Leonardo Da Vinci's and Einsteins' but have no fear as the human spirit and natural talent are never subject to vogue theories or the political swing. My concern is with the "very long tail" it is disturbing that so many students have low career aspirations and concequently limited life opportunity. Teachers are skilled professionals, they need to do their job. Alas there will always be bad parents!

23 Oct 2009 06:04p.m.

David wrote:

Kathy, professional developement are courses designed to update teachers who got their qualifications 10 or 20 years earlier.. to teach them new theories and standards to make sure they are able to teach your children the best way of learning.

Without professional development you would have maths teachers who know nothing of newer theories and your kids will be getting a thirty year old education.

New Zealands early childhood ciriculum does not believe in milestones, it does not believe that children should be at set stages of development, it believes in your childs right to chose their own path in life.

In New Zealand support for just reading writing and arithmetic is assinine.

New Zealand will be a society of mathematicians (or National party members) we will yield no budding einsteins as science is apparently not worth supporting.. no leonardo Da vinci's no bachs or motzarts (all great artists/musicians and scientists).

National's focus on education is tiny and pointless.

And there really are more bad parents than bad teachers.

23 Oct 2009 04:26p.m.

Ken wrote:

Kathy you are dead right, this whole thing is getting out of hand. I am all in favour of professional development but the time allocated to teachers is out of balance with the class contact time. My childs Primary level teachers now have professional development days, release days, teachers only days and 11 non-contact weeks between terms! Even if you are generous with other occupations and allow 5 weeks holidays that is still 6 weeks that should be available for PD and curriculum development. Not to mention that daily contact is only between 9am and 3pm. I mean these are primary school children how much can the curriculum (3R's) change from one year to the next?! If overall there is less child contact time is it really achieving the desired outcome?

23 Oct 2009 04:04p.m.

Jim wrote:

Kevin - Totally agree
Kathy - You are right that it should be a teachers job to know these things, but unfortunately our modern bureaucrats turned them into form fillers, dotting I's and crossing T's. The bureaucrats should leave education to teachers. I am glad the DHB's are down sizing their bureaucrats!!!

23 Oct 2009 03:47p.m.

kathy wrote:

Yes sometimes the responsibility les with bad parents but if as a body they received millions of dollars of funding for "parental development" we would head all the lists OECD etc. Food for thought! Bad and incompetent teachers should be weeded-out as they soak up tax dollars and are of marginal value to society.

23 Oct 2009 03:33p.m.

cyril wrote:

The reporting system needs to be so parents can see where there children are against other kids and the long term medium or where they should be. NCEA to me is confusing and an average parent has no idea how there child is really doing. Teacher accessment leaves a lot to be desired as with my boy 4 out of 5 teachers reports sounded like we had an up and coming genius and the 5th one said he was mucking about and not reaching anything like his true potential. Unfortunately I agreed with the last teacher as he was being a wee shit at the time. At parent intervue night my daughters english teacher told us she was going fine and we had no worrys then at the end of the term she was given a national standard test which showed she was reading two years behind her age. If we dont know how they are truely doing how are we to make the right choices for them.

23 Oct 2009 02:58p.m.

Kathy wrote:

Just why do teachers need xxdollars for "professional development" to upskill to teach the 3R's? I thought that was a teacher's job, they are the professionals we entrust our children's education to. About time they were accountable!! Great shame for all the children who fell through the "cracks".

23 Oct 2009 02:24p.m.

Kevin wrote:

I just wish they'd stop mucking around with education! This is a return to the old days when kids were tested throughout every year at school, against accepted medians and against each other. I have no problem with it - in fact I support it. But the only reason this is a "change" is because politicians kept changing education over the years. Children have an education to prepare them for life, and adulthood is competitive. Each child should reach a predetermined standard of acceptability and should be measured against it. And while we're at, drop this stupid NCEA garbage where kids get credits for talking nicely to the teacher, and reintroduce School Cert and UE. School is for education - nothing else.

23 Oct 2009 01:59p.m.

psycthom wrote:

The real test will be whether the government puts its money where its mouth is and support kids who are 'behind'

I would rather see money put into reducing class sizes, especially for primary and intermediate education.