• Full Story

New laws for adventure tourism operators

Print

Thu, 13 Oct 2011 9:59p.m.

Emily Jordan drowned during a Mad Dog River Boarding trip (file)

Emily Jordan drowned during a Mad Dog River Boarding trip (file)

Following two recent deaths the government has announced new laws affecting commercial adventure tourism and outdoor education operators in New Zealand.

From November 1, operators who provide activities designed to purposely expose people to a managed risk of serious harm will have six months to notify the Department of Labour about their company.

They then have three years in which they must undergo a safety audit and be registered - unless the department asks them to do it earlier.

The April 2008 death of English tourist Emily Jordan - who drowned after becoming trapped by a rock during a Mad Dog River Boarding trip - triggered the review into adventure tourism.

Mad Dog's parent company Black Sheep Adventures pleaded guilty to two health and safety charges, and was fined $66,000 and ordered to pay $80,000 in reparation.

In a separate incident, Massey University student Catherine Peters died when she fell over 20 metres onto a riverbed during a bridge swing over the Manawatu Gorge with Crag Adventures.

The company's director Alistair McWhannell was found guilty of manslaughter over the March 2009 incident, and the police and Department of Labour launched investigations.

Minister of Labour Kate Wilkinson says safety is already a top priority for most of the industry's companies, but the regulations will make sure operators are consistent and strengthen out international reputation.

The laws do not apply to companies that don't charge fees such as schools or voluntary clubs, she says.

NZN

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

14 Oct 2011 08:56a.m.

Gavin Wills wrote:

Agreed! Over the last 60 years Gliding New Zealand has developed an excellent set of rules and guidelines to govern all aspects of the sport of Gliding and in 6 short months our CAA appears to have pulled the rug out from under them. What can we do about it?

14 Oct 2011 08:11a.m.

Brainyblocks wrote:

It's a total travesty that the government only care about regulating industry AFTER someone has died...they don't give a toss about operators who are trying to put regulations into place to protect against this kind of thing happening BEFORE it happens

13 Oct 2011 11:58p.m.

Gavin Wills wrote:

The ramifications of the Kawarau River accident have spread far and wide and the bureaucrats have been quick to leap on the bandwagon. In response to the Dep of Labour's new requirements for adventure tourism Civil Aviation has proposed a Rule to govern "Adventure Aviation" that is completely over the top and unworkable in the opinion of a number of very senior aviation experts. CAA's new rule with respect to gliding (160 odd pages long) has been poorly constructed with little if any industry consultation. Its high costs will probably put my little business - Glide Omarama (Richie McCaw's gliding home) out of business. Glide Omarama is NZ's only commercial (non club) gliding operator. It has successfully managed its business for 18 years with out a single accident involving the joy riding public. Glide Omarama is affiliated to Gliding NZ which has managed public rides for 60 years with the approval of CAA and without a single fatal accident. Gliding NZ certifies our aircraft, trains our instructors and approves our operation at a fraction of the cost of the CAA proposal and at no cost to the tax payer. The new Rule has been introduced without adequate consultation, without a cost benefit analysis and without accurate risk assessment data. Gliding NZ and senior members of the aviation industry (including a past deputy director and a past director of CAA) have submitted to CAA that the Rule is unnecessary and seriously flawed - “it is a solution looking for a problem”. If the Rule is implemented Glide Omarama would become the only Gliding operation in the world to be regulated in this way! The National Party has promised us minimal regulation and good regulation. CAA’s proposal for Adventure Aviation with respect to Gilding is neither. While it is an attempt to follow the PM’s directive it is misguided and costly, both to the tax payer and to an industry that is already highly regulated and well managed. No one appears to be listening and we are desperate!