New quake minutes after expert's address

Print

Fri, 06 Jan 2012 6:10p.m. UPDATED 6:10PM

Aftershocks could continue for up to 30 years

Aftershocks could continue for up to 30 years

Click view video for the 6 News summary from the quake meeting

Christchurch residents were shaken by a 5.0 earthquake on Friday, minutes after experts predicted they were likely to feel one of that magnitude in the coming weeks.

Earthquake scientists told a meeting of Christchurch elected representatives today that they were unlikely to face a major earthquake of magnitude seven or higher which could cause a serious tsunami, but there could still be some unsettling ones between 5 and 5.5.

As if to emphasise the point, a 5.0 earthquake centred 10km northeast of Christchurch was recorded by GNS Science at 2.20pm, just as the meeting was due to wrap up.

The meeting was called to provide more information in the wake of the magnitude 5.8 and 6.0 quakes on December 23.

"We had said the chances of a 5 to 5.9 earthquake was about 50-50, and we have unfortunately had one at or just above what we had forecast," seismologist Kelvin Berryman told the meeting.

"The probability of a (magnitude) seven or greater continues to be very, very low. It's not zero, but it's low.

"There's almost certainly still a 5.0 out there is my guess, and we would expect quite a few fours and threes."

Mr Berryman said the concentration of quakes since the 7.1 September 2010 quake which began the sequence in Darfield, west of Christchurch, appeared to be moving eastward and was now centred offshore.

He said the greatest danger of a tsunami damaging Christchurch was for one originating from South America, where very large quakes were more common, than from off the coast of Christchurch given they didn't expect a quake of seven or above.

Quakes of 6.0 were unlikely to produce a significant tsunami, though one of about 7.0 or higher could, he said.

When asked about possible future liquefaction in eastern suburbs of Christchurch, Mr Berryman said they would need to suffer quakes of about 6.0 close to Christchurch, or of much higher magnitudes from places further afield such as Hanmer or the Alpine Fault.

He said some aftershocks could continue for up to 30 years.

Meanwhile, Taranaki also had an earthquake on Friday.

A quake measuring 4.1 centred 10km northwest of Hawera was recorded at 12.50pm.

NZN / 3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

11 Jan 2012 03:54p.m.

jan.. wrote:

We trust the Mayor of Christchurch Mr. Parker to confirm the above mentioned by Roger Suttons and his never ending stories or threats frightening the Christchurch residents and their tourisms industries..
We are counting on Mr. Parker to have the last say on any matter corncerning Christchurch based on all trust..

07 Jan 2012 11:43a.m.

RAS wrote:

Yes all well and good but the residents and ratepayers of Christchurch should certainly have had the benefit of the Griffiths / McNulty Report in AZugust last year so that they could have made theri own decisions on whether or not they chose to live and keep their families in Chrsiwtchurch. It is unacceptable for the council to have sat on that report - must surely be a "please explain" to Parker and Marryatt?

07 Jan 2012 11:43a.m.

RAS wrote:

Yes all well and good but the residents and ratepayers of Christchurch should certainly have had the benefit of the Griffiths / McNulty Report in AZugust last year so that they could have made theri own decisions on whether or not they chose to live and keep their families in Chrsiwtchurch. It is unacceptable for the council to have sat on that report - must surely be a "please explain" to Parker and Marryatt?

06 Jan 2012 10:48p.m.

Bridget wrote:

Not at all impressed by Roger Sutton's comment that it's ok if we get another magnitude 6 earthquake as the majority of Christchurch are not affected. I am in Parklands and very much affected. Make us red!!!!!!!!