Skull found in Australia 700 years old, but not Aboriginal

Are there any websites you can recommend with further information about this Harry?

Perhaps the police should read the log books of Captain Cook and Captain Dampier.Both of these captains reported in their logs that that africans were still in Australia being eaten off by the ancestors of the present day aboriginals whom are from India,the tasmanian aboriginal was African .He had curly hair,the people with curly hair came from Africa,includind the people of Figi Vanuatu Solomons Neumea Papua.Perhaps they should allso take a look at the Phoenician boat harbour in Queensland.According to two Phoenician maps discovered in NZ that harbour would date back to before 600 BC. The Phoenicians had at least 12 cities in NZ and a number of cities in Australia at that time.Allso the Africans were in both countrys at or before that time.WE have too muchforbidden history in both countrys because ancient man was supposed to be stupid according to evolution and the European the most evolved,remember Hitler?.The africans colonised the entire southern hemisphere while the Europeans were wandering aruond their backyards,this does not fit with early teachings of evolution where the African was supposed a subspiecies of human not yet fully evolved.Maori traditions tell of at least four different peoples living in NZ at the time they arrived.Look at the statues on Easter Island then look at the Long Heads from south Malekula Vanuatu whoes ancesters came from Africa.Who built all the stone arrangements in Australia and NZ which have been shutup about and many deliberatly destroyed in both countries.Artifacts discovered in both countries give us a history as old as that found in Europe.Stonehenge? We had one on MT Wellington.Think of the tourisim potential if this stuff was not destroyed but their is still a lot remaining