• Full Story

Rankin to front 'vote no' smacking campaign

Print

Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:00a.m.

Bradford was the architect of a 2007 law change which removed the defence of reasonable force in child abuse cases

Bradford was the architect of a 2007 law change which removed the defence of reasonable force in child abuse cases

Families Commissioner Christine Rankin's decision to be a face of the "vote no" campaign for the smacking referendum is "quite incredible", Green MP Sue Bradford says.

Ms Bradford was the architect of a 2007 law change which removed the defence of reasonable force in child abuse cases.

Ms Rankin vehemently opposed the law change and was spokeswoman of For The Sake Of Our Children Trust.

Tomorrow Ms Rankin will front at the launch of a campaign urging voters to vote no to the question "should a smack as part of good parental correction be a criminal offence in New Zealand"?

That is despite Prime Minister John Key last week saying he would not expect Ms Rankin to continue to campaign against the law change, and the Families Commission saying it supported the new law.

"I am surprised because I had thought that Christine Rankin was under strict instructions from the Government to keep her head down now that she's been appointed a Families Commissioner," Ms Bradford told NZPA.

"It seems extraordinary that she's willing and able to be the public face of the vote `no' campaign ... it's quite incredible."

Ms Rankin was paid $565 a day up to 100 days a year in her position as a commissioner and as such was supposed to represent the interests of all New Zealand families, Ms Bradford said.

She questioned how that was compatible with being "out there on the front line campaigning for the `no' vote".

"I just do not see how her position as a Families Commissioner is tenable and would ask John Key and Paula Bennett to urgently reconsider her position."

Ms Rankin last week refused to comment on the referendum as the media had "ripped her to shreds" when she was appointed to the commission last month.

Ms Rankin's history of extravagant spending as a public servant and her relationship with a newly widowed man were publicised widely after her appointment to the commission.

The citizen initiated non-binding referendum will be held by postal ballot from July 31 to August 21. It was forced by a petition organised by opponents of the 2007 law change.

Bob McCoskrie, director of Family First NZ which is leading the "vote no" campaign, said Ms Rankin had not expressed any concerns about being involved.

"She's got freedom to speak out on it," he told NZPA.

NZPA

 

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

13 Aug 2009 08:54a.m.

Ashlee wrote:

She is missing the entire principal of the legislation which is to protect all children from assalt. This is incredible she is opposing this legislation that is focused on protecting children!
The ignorance will never cease to amaze! Wake up to why we make laws, laws are in place for the worst possible senario!

22 Jun 2009 07:47a.m.

Peter wrote:

Ahhh Sue Bradford sticks her foot in her mouth again. Since the leaders of both major parties have suggested it is possible to vote No and still support the law why does Sue Bradford think Christine Rankins No vote is a concern? Or does Sue Bradford think the question in the referendum is not ambigious like John Key and Phil Goff do?