3News » Home
Full Story

Planned wind farm causing divisions in valley community

3 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA

video
Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:00a.m.

The aim of Meridian Energy's Project Hayes is to put 176 wind turbines on the top of the Lammermore Range, producing, when the wind blows, power for up to 250,000 average homes.

The Environment Court is currently hearing evidence about whether it should proceed, and lined up in opposition are a high profile collection of people that include the painter Grahame Sydney and poet Brian Turner, plus rugby players Anton Oliver and David Kirk.

Campbell Live visited two neighbouring families: one very much in favour, one very much against.

The cattle are cold and impatient; they are waiting for 17-year-old Brooke Elliot to turn up with their feed. The sun is not even up yet, but she and her family are well into the day's work.

"We love farming," says Sue Elliot. "We've got three kids that love farming. You've got to be looking ahead for the mortgage."

This is the third generation of Elliots on the Lammermore farm. Five-and-a-half thousand hectares of organic sheep, beef, and now possibly, wind.

"It's just another form of farming," says John Elliot.

"It's just a diversification, and the only thing the wind will do which you can't with farming, is it will be a guaranteed income," says Ms Elliot.

It is on the top of the nearby range that that guaranteed income would sit: 68 of the 176 proposed wind turbines.

Just what that income would be is still all a bit vague, but the Elliots do stand to do very well out of the project.

"Yeah we stand to do well out of it, but we're good farmers. We do well anyway," says Mrs Elliot.

The Elliots work hard, on hard land. Their community is small. The school only has five pupils, and the mail only comes three times a week. Cellphones? Forget it.

They believe the wind farm, and all the construction that goes with it, would change all that.

"The positives for this community far outweigh the negatives, and it's just so beneficial to the whole community," says Ms Elliot.

On the side where the wind farm will go are five farms in favour of them. On the other side of the valley, people are opposed.

The Masons are on the other side of the valley and the other side of the argument. They too have farmed this land for three generations, but there will not be a fourth if the wind farm goes ahead.

"Yeah, it would be hard to stay," says Ian Mason, "because of what it will do to what I've grown up to and what I'm attached to.

"I mean, that's the reason we live in this area, because of what it is. The isolation is what I'm attached to."

Two other farmers have recently sold up on this side of the valley, at least partly because of the project

From every point on the Mason farm there would be a view of the turbines.

"It's gonna dominate that whole east side of the valley, from one end to the other there's no getting away from that," says Mr Mason.

It is the sight and sound of what they call the 'great white whirling monsters'.

"And of course they're all huge, half the size of the mountain on top of the mountain," says Sarah Mason. "All moving constantly out of synchronisation, very unnatural.

"Our wee school only has five pupils in it. The wind farm will be 1400m from it, I'm not sure. Far too close."

The Masons are not afraid of the 'nimby' tag – not in my back yard.

"That's one of the first things Meridian started calling us," says Mr Mason.

"To an extent we are, and quite proud of it," says Ms Mason. "Everyone wants to look after their own back yard, no one else is going to come into the wop wops here and look after it for us."
 
One valley, two families. Only one of them is going to come out of this happily.

"Its going to be a real spin off right through the whole centre," says Mr Elliot. "Obviously for ourselves, it would be naive to say you wouldn't, but it's gonna be beneficial for all New Zealanders in the end."

Would the Masons really leave if the wind farm was built?

"Yes, I think so," says Mr Mason. "It will be hard, especially with the family attachment, three generations, all my life here, so far over 40 years."

When it does blow in this part of the world, it can really howl.

For Meridian it is a fortune just begging to be harvested, but that is now in the hands of the Environment Court.

Comments [3]

Irene
19 Jun 2008 3:27p.m.

Re Project Hayes. This should not go ahead.
I recently crossed the Lammermoor range and this absolutely brilliant pristine environment must be kept for future NZ'ers. I might add there was not a breath of wind in my two days there.
I have seen the wind farms of the Manawatu, and in that environment, with mixed hills, trees, valleys etc the turbines are not nearly as intrusive as they would be in the great vistas of central Otago.
We should not put turbines, and all the infrastructure that go along with them into Central. There are much more appropriate and efficient ways and places of increasing the power supply than this destructive plan.
Irene....of Waihi.

cass
18 Jun 2008 10:49p.m.

Thinking windfarms are a sustainable, long-term solution for energy needs is simply egregious, small-minded, short-term rationale. Leave the natural environment of Central Otago alone, profit and so called progress are not worth the cost of land desecration, or the potential development-induced displacement of people that are a part of that land. Reconsidering our use of energy and curbing our consumerism habits would be a much smaller cost with far fewer future implications. Providing solutions also lie within us and the ways we choose to live.

Greg
18 Jun 2008 9:31p.m.

I'm in a similar boat, yet in the North Island along the PROPOSED (yet was a done deal before publicly proposed) power line upgrade.

I've also been in a similar situation before where I was lucky to get out - just in time, yet NOT this time.

My neighbour's sold his property so TransPower can put in their MEGA towers without objection on the powerline path.

Those around it ( like myself) have NO power (no pun intended) or WEIGHT of SAY in the decision making process, nor will we have any compensation yet will have to suffer the aesthetic environmental impact, the noise and other negatives that will be IMPOSED on us.

Meanwhile the Power Company will profit from our LOSS!

The system should NOT allow the land owners to SELL out and thereby inflict or pass on hardship to neighbours.

We ALL AGREE that we need MORE power generation, however ALL parties who are impacted (needs better definition to include noise, aesthetics etc) should also be recompensed OR bought out at FAIR market rates and then onsold to parties willing to accept the NEW living conditions.

Companies with DEEP pockets and/or Govt backed seem to have ALL of the power then MUCK rake by calling opponents names and rallying public negativitiy towards the opponents.

Valid opponents who stand to lose quality of life such as suffering environmental polution from noise, sight etc should NOT have to be victims, whilst those who can make deals and profit can stand up and EXTOLL the virtues of the scheme.

I agree that Wind Farming is another form of farming, however you will NEGATIVELY impact your neighbours and profit at the same time. Your whilst valid, is also BIASSED.

I feel for the Masons and others like this.

I know we all want more power, however be fair to all in the process, not just those with the land needed.

Post a comment

Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:


3News Video 3News Audio

Post your opinion

3News -
Comments (4)

Will NZ be a rip-off destination during the World Cup?

A recent spat between a holiday maker and a North Shore motel owner has revived debated over the legality of motels and hotels hiking their rates come World Cup time. Will New Zealand be a rip-off destination during the World Cup?