No earthquake re-insurance for Canterbury

26 Sep 2011 08:40a.m.

jan.. wrote:

That's what's wrong, they garranteed promises they cannot keep and now an upset among the quarkes victims of Christchurch.. Christchurch is the main issue here and not Wellington.. They should have left Mayor Parker of Christchurch to deal with the situation, and those insuarance companies better bloody pay-up..

20 Sep 2011 11:14a.m.

pitbull wrote:

What a Bloody joke?Earthquake Recovery Minister,Gerry Brownlee,What a man,Flower grower,EARTHQUAKE RECOVERY,what the hell is that?does he go around recovering goods damaged in the earthquake?Does he wobble about the city eating burgers and cream puffs?He has no Ideas so had too take a sponge bob trip overseas too see if the Burgers and cream puffs are bigger than here.Then Key goes on about labour spending tax payers money,what a joke he has egg all over his face.How many thousands has it already cost the tax payers for Key and his tribe too travel around the world in the past 2-3/4 years.Then the amount to pay out the losses created by the RWC.

19 Sep 2011 11:13p.m.

Ed wrote:

I agree with jj - who do you believe. Perhaps a phone call to Anna Bligh (Queensland) might work as she called a meeting of the insurers in Qld and ensured that they paid out after the floods. Most of our insurers in NZ are from OZ, so Gerry, a quick trip across the Tasman might get results.

19 Sep 2011 11:09p.m.

HaleyD wrote:

Great! The Govt is really getting the run-around by insurers and they are certainly in charge. First of all the EQC legislation was poorly written (thought out) and the EQC are now paying for every event - saving insurers millions. Secondly, insurers are now playing games and saying that houses which are obviously 'rebuilds', could now suddenly be 'repaired' - again saving them millions and costing the Govt more. Now they are saying that no rebuilding can take place until the seismic activity ceases (imagine all the interest they are making rather than paying out). Full replacement insurance is simply that - full replacement and insurers should not be permitted to unreasonably withhold payment ... it has the makings of a class action lawsuit. I'm 'over' living in a 2 bedroom house and so are my children. I'm also stressed to the max at all the extra payments - full insurance on a house I can't live in, a mortgage, 60% rates, renters insurance on our current location (I'll call it that). I need to register my kids for school next year and I have no idea where we will be next year as our landlord wants to sell.

19 Sep 2011 02:29p.m.

jj wrote:

Key and Brownlee should correspond more often as one tells one story,and the other tells another.Neither know what is going on so both should go in November.

19 Sep 2011 02:11p.m.

Geranium wrote:

sorry to say this but he is TOO FAT. As a Government leader he should be setting a better example to our kids and stop being a drain on our health system. Get out and jog man. Crikey.

18 Sep 2011 06:57p.m.

Aron wrote:

Vote National vote for a brighter future!!! ...Yea right

18 Sep 2011 05:12p.m.

Clarke wrote:

A ten to twenty thousand dollar trip to find out what he could have found out with a $10-20 international phone call or two. So much for accountability and making sure tax payer funds arent wasted. Sounds like Gerry was just looking for an excusse to holiday in the states for a few days. @Just saying, it will depend on how close to an election the earthquake is for us here in Wellington. We know we are overdue for a big one and we are waiting on it, but just like Christchurch we expect little to nothing from a National Government in response. I guess if they could privatise National disasters or sell them off as state assets I would expect a little more interest out of self interested right wing politicians and their sleazy supporters.

18 Sep 2011 01:03p.m.

Just Saying wrote:

So it took a tax-payer funded trip to Europe to tell Gerry Brownlee what was blindingly obvious before he even left these shores. Nice one Gerry ! This trip was probably only arranged to make it 'look' like the government Earthquake Minister was doing something in an election year. So why not do what you are actually paid to do Gerry, sack Ian Simpson, and bring in genuine accountability to the Earthquake Recovery, rather than some over paid cronies. Then when you have done with that, stand aside yourself for someone who might actually give a damn. Of course to hold the EQC accountable, the government would have to acknowledge that they were advised by the previous CEO that the EQC would in all likelihood fail in a major event, but chose to manage the risk . . . For anyone thinking of voting National in the forthcoming election, consider the fact that while it is Christchurch being stuffed at present, when it is Wellington or Auckland's turn this will be the best response you will get - those of us in Christchurch living with this on a day to day basis wish you the best of luck.