3News » Home
Full Story

Obama proposes $4 trillion cuts to lower deficit

8 comments | Post Comment email Email printer friendly Print    Text Size:
aA
aA
aA
President Barack Obama delivers a speech on US fiscal and budgetary deficit policy at the George Washington University (Reuters)

President Barack Obama delivers a speech on US fiscal and budgetary deficit policy at the George Washington University (Reuters)

video
Thu, 14 Apr 2011 7:43a.m.

By Jim Kuhnhenn

Forcefully rejecting Republican budget-cutting plans, President Barack Obama has proposed lowering America's future deficits by US$4 trillion over a dozen years and vowed he would not allow benefit cuts for the poor and the elderly to pay for tax breaks for the rich.

"That's not right and it's not going to happen as long as I'm president," Obama declared.

While the president recommended trimming health care costs in Medicare and Medicaid, he also called for cuts in defence, an overhaul of the tax system to eliminate many loopholes enjoyed by individuals and corporations, and an end to Bush-era tax cuts for wealthier Americans.

"We have to live within our means, we have to reduce our deficit, and we have to get back on a path that will allow us to pay down our debt," Obama said in a combative speech at George Washington University.

As much a policy speech as it was a political address, Obama laid the blame for the rising debt on the spending increases and tax cuts enacted during the presidency of George W. Bush and the recession that struck in late 2007. "We lost our way," he said.

Ensuring that the nation's fiscal troubles will be at the centre of the 2012 presidential election, Obama drew sharp contrasts with a Republican plan that cuts about US$5.8 trillion in spending over the next decade and which the White House says unfairly singles out middle-class taxpayers, older adults and the poor. He pointedly noted that the GOP plan has already been embraced by some Republican presidential candidates.

Such cuts, he said, "paint a vision of our future that's deeply pessimistic".

"Their vision is less about reducing the deficit than it is about changing the basic social compact in America," Obama said, as the author of the Republican plan, House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, sat in the front row of the university auditorium.

Obama previewed his proposals to congressional leaders Wednesday morning. And even before he delivered his speech, top Republicans were pushing back.

"If we're going to resolve our differences and do something meaningful, raising taxes will not be part of that," House Speaker John Boehner declared shortly after his White House meeting.

This new clash comes just a week after the president announced he would seek re-election. For the past two months, Obama has been arguing for protection of his core spending priorities, including education and innovation. His turn to deficit reduction reflects the pressures he faces in a divided Congress and with a public increasingly anxious about the nation's debt, now exceeding US$14 trillion.

"Any serious plan to tackle our deficit will require us to put everything on the table, and take on excess spending wherever it exists in the budget," the president said.

To help enforce budget discipline, the president called for resurrecting a spending cap that would be triggered if the nation's debt did not stabilise and begin to decline by 2014. The cap would not apply to Social Security, low-income programs or Medicare benefits.

The president's plan, outlined in a seven-page White House fact sheet, draws many of its ideas from the December recommendations of Obama's bipartisan fiscal commission, which proposed US$4 trillion in deficit reduction over 10 years. As in the commission's plan, three quarters of the deficit reduction would come from spending cuts, including lower interest payments as the debt eases. One quarter, or US$1 trillion, would come from additional tax revenue.

For the White House, the speech comes as Obama pushes Congress to raise the limit on the national debt, which will permit the government to borrow more and thus meet its financial obligations. The country will reach its debt limit of US$14.3 trillion by May 16. The Treasury Department has warned that failure to raise the limit by midsummer would drive up the cost of borrowing and destroy the economic recovery.

In laying out his plan, the president is wading into a potential political thicket. Liberals are loath to making cuts in prized Democratic programs like Medicare and Medicaid, and in Social Security. Moderates worry that his plan could unravel bipartisan deficit-cutting negotiations. And Republicans reject any proposal that includes tax increases.

The proposal calls for cutting US$770 billion from non-defence domestic spending by 2023. That figure does not include spending on major benefit programs like Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. The plan also would reduce defence spending by US$400 billion during the same 12 years.

Obama envisions spending cuts in Medicare and Medicaid of US$480 billion through 2023. Those are in addition to the US$500 billion in reductions over 10 years from projected increases in Medicare spending contained in the health care law Congress passed and Obama signed last year.

The president's planned health care reductions include vague proposals to lower Medicaid costs and reduce Medicare prescription drug expenses.

While the White House concedes that Social Security is facing pressure from an aging population, Obama did not specify any changes to the national retirement system other than calling for bipartisan efforts to "strengthen the program".

AP

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Comments [8]

insider
17 Apr 2011 3:11p.m.

Here are the Facts "Obama: U.S. to withdraw most Iraq troops by August 2010" Wont happen!. The Obama DECEPTION is true!. Obama is continuing the process of transforming America into something that resembles Nazi Germany, with forced National Service, domestic civilian spies, warrantless wiretaps, the destruction of the Second Amendment, FEMA camps and Martial Law. Obama’s handlers are openly announcing the creation of a new Bank of the World that will dominate every nation on earth through carbon taxes and military force. International bankers purposefully engineered the worldwide financial meltdown to bankrupt the nations of the planet and bring in World Government. Obama plans to loot the middle class, destroy pensions and federalize the states so that the population is completely dependent on the Central Government. The Elite are using Obama to pacify the public so they can usher in the North American Union by stealth, launch a new Cold War and continue the occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan. Its ALL part of the PLAN.

Hitler
15 Apr 2011 1:29a.m.

I vote Ronald Mac Donald for president, he makes nice burgers hehehe!!

insider
14 Apr 2011 11:25p.m.

Don't mention that Bary Obama is still a CIA asset.

Osama
14 Apr 2011 8:33p.m.

obima is good person and he is black and proud to be
he will take another term in the black house

Alex
14 Apr 2011 7:26p.m.

"Our own government, despite being from the right, have failed to make inroads as well" Perhaps it is because of, and not despite, right wing economic policy (that has persisted for the last 3 decades all over the world!) that we are in such deep doggy doo. Just a thought.

Peter Jackson
14 Apr 2011 6:06p.m.

Quite a vitriolic response from you David. I don't think you have captured the essence of wealth however. You need to consider who owes the money and who they owe it to. The $14.3 billion is owed by the US government, and most of it is owed to US citizens. China, the biggest creditor is owed just over $1 trillion, which is only a matter of months spending. Wealth also includes assets, and it is a fairly obvious fact that the people who owe the most in the world are the richest; they have to be to get the loans, and when we take an unbiased look the US treasury note is still considered a very strong and low risk asset to hold when compared to other nations, ours included. But the reason for this comment is not that - its that I am getting sick of the media getting things wrong. The deficit is the annual amount by which expenditure exceeds spending. Obama is not cutting the deficit over 12 years by $4 trillion, he is cutting the accumulated 12 year deficit by $4 trillion - big difference. I do not know what the projected deficit is over the next 12 years but cutting $4 trillion is not likely to reduce it to zero, so even if the plan was implemented successfully the US government debt position would be worse at the end of the period than it is now. It is becoming a pattern in recent times that (especially) western governments are unable to deliver the structural change necessary to balance budgets and stay elected. Our own government, despite being from the right, have failed to make inroads as well, and this is before the earthquakes arrived on the scene. The cyclical analysis that pervades the media analysis ignores the extremely obvious possibility that the world economy is undergoing a seismic change and will not return to previous equilibriums a la the predictions of many economists

Mannix
14 Apr 2011 3:28p.m.

Mr kulnhenn,would have to be a devoted follower of the "left to right swivelhead" President!.(Watch him on TV).When he was a Senator in about 2007 he opposed President George Bush when he wanted to raise the US debt level. The number of Americans leaving America because of his Socialist/Communist policies I understand are increasing daily and believing him to be a muslim.Furthermore he did not initiate the spending reduction,it was the the conservatives. He is all for the islamic countries,he has been to most of them but not to the best supporter of the US, "Israel". He is supposed to be the leader of the West,God help us(The real God). It would appear the is fighting to be the US worst President with Jimmy Carter.The west can only hope he is only a one term President!.This is his 4th year as president and president swivel head still blames G.W. Bush.The previous writer is right is not now the richest country in the world. His anti war rhetoric was all B.S. the trial of terrorists location??.But if your "black" and intimidate white and Black people at the polling booth,his A.G.says that's OK. Obama is a racist and now becoming a politician hoping to get a 2nd term.

David Jacobs
14 Apr 2011 12:18p.m.

"The country will reach its debt limit of US$14.3 trillion by May 16."
I am no expert on financial matters, but I would have thought that the credit limit for the US would be governed by the amount of gold reserves held in Fort Knox. This being the case, the reserves must be in the vicinity of 279000 tons, or 313000 US tons, assuming a gold price of US$1430 per ounce. This then raises the question of how much gold has been mined in the US over the past 200 years, and how much Treasury actually purchased, and what happens when the credit limit is reached?
Much has been said regarding the "wealth" of the US, and the term "richest country" now seems no more than a myth. If they pass their credit limit, then surely their creditors would have the right to do what US banks are doing to their mortgagees - push for foreclosure.
Belt-tightening has been a term bandied about for years, but nothing seems to have been done about it. Henry Paulsen allowed Lehmann Bros bank to collapse, yet underwrote some of the other "preferred" banks. Had the whole banking system been forced to sort out their individual problems, with Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae being disbanded, there would have been only short term disruption in financial sectors compared with the long term problems now being faced.
To progress, the US must learn from their Asian neighbours (excluding Japan) and learn to live within their means. They are not the "richest country" in the world because they have so much debt, and until that debt is repaid in full, they effectively have nothing. The quickest way to begin repaying this debt would be to sell assets and technology and swallow their pride by admitting that they did things wrong.
The time has passed for the US to keep saving face, and to realise that the world is not Disneyland.

Post a comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide here
Name:
Email: (Won't be published)
Comment:



3News Video 3News Audio

Post your opinion