• Full Story

Ohio woman posts 'White Only' pool sign

Print

Fri, 13 Jan 2012 9:47a.m.

(AAP file)

(AAP file)

By Andrew Welsh-Huggins

A Cincinnati landlord who claimed a black girl's hair products clouded an apartment complex's swimming pool discriminated against the child by posting a poolside "White Only" sign, an Ohio civil rights panel said this week in upholding a previous finding.

The Ohio Civil Rights Commission voted 4-0 against reconsidering its finding from last fall. There was no discussion.

The group found on September 29 that Jamie Hein, who is white, violated the Ohio Civil Rights Act by posting the sign at a pool at the duplex where the teenage girl was visiting her parents.

The parents filed a discrimination charge with the commission and moved out of the duplex in the racially diverse city to "avoid subjecting their family to further humiliating treatment," the commission said in a release announcing its finding.

An investigation revealed that Hein in May posted on the gated entrance to the pool an iron sign that stated "Public Swimming Pool, White Only," the commission statement said.

Several witnesses confirmed that the sign was posted, and the landlord indicated that she posted it because the girl used chemicals in her hair that would make the pool "cloudy," according to the commission.

The girl's father, Michael Gunn, in brief comments Thursday, described his shock last spring when venturing out for a lunch break by the pool.

"My initial reaction to seeing the sign was of shock, disgust and outrage," Gunn said. He also told the commission that his daughter was saddened months later to learn they moved from the apartment complex "was in a way related to the colour of her skin". Gunn declined to speak with reporters.

Hein has repeatedly declined to comment and did not attend the hearing. Messages were left at her lawyer's office Wednesday and Thursday.

"I was trying to protect my assets," she told the commission's housing enforcement director in a September 27 interview.

Racial discrimination has particular resonance in Cincinnati, whose population is 45 percent black, far higher than the rest of Ohio, which is about 12 percent black. Surrounding Hamilton County is 26 percent black.

Cincinnati was the scene of race riots in April 2001 police and demonstrators clashed in a blighted neighbourhood following the shooting of a black suspect by police.

The commission's statement said that its investigation concluded that the posting of such a sign "restricts the social interaction between Caucasians and African-Americans and reinforces discriminatory actions aimed at oppressing people of colour".

The case is to be referred to the Ohio attorney general's office, which would represent the commission's findings before an administrative law judge. That judge would determine any penalties, which could include a cease-and-desist order and punitive damages.

It still would be possible for the parties to reach a settlement before resorting to legal action.

Any decision by the administrative judge could be appealed to Hamilton County Common Pleas Court in Cincinnati.

AP

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

15 Jan 2012 12:45p.m.

AC wrote:

Actually, under the Civil Rights Amendment, she does not have the right. She's renting units, and, if the pool is available to the renters, she can't exclude a select few since under housing laws, she cannot discriminate based on, among all the other things, race/color. Besides, the sign even said "Public Swimming Pool- Whites Only." If it's public, she can't restrict who comes in- that's discrimination.

13 Jan 2012 02:26p.m.

Stephen Berry wrote:

It is private property. The landlord, however ignorant and misguided, has every right to decide who may or may not access their property.