Opinion: Apiata disgraced by Defence Force top brass

Print

Thu, 19 Jul 2012 9:26a.m.

Maybe Apiata's departure relates to pay and conditions - the rest of the Armed Forces are certainly complaining

Maybe Apiata's departure relates to pay and conditions - the rest of the Armed Forces are certainly complaining

Opinion by Political Reporter Patrick Gower

There could hardly be a worse advertisement for the New Zealand Defence Force right now.

Willie Apiata, VC, quits - and doesn't even get so much as a goodbye from the top brass.

Yes, the Army's poster boy just walked on out - like over 900 other servicemen and women have in the past two years.

It goes like this - morale is in the doldrums, there's a pay freeze and the Government's cost-cutting reforms have really hurt.

All this adds up to people just not wanting to work for the armed forces as much as they used to.

And now the departed includes none other than Willie Apiata - just how symbolic is that?

His departure from the SAS was broken to the public by a muttering Defence Minister on the way to Parliament yesterday.

The Defence Force then rushed out a bland statement - I strongly suspect they did not know what to say.

And finally it put something out on behalf of Apiata himself.

It was all very disorganised - there was certainly no military-style precision.

It all points to there being some deeper issue to Apiata's departure.

As the rumour mill has it, he's been arguing over getting some extra leave to be with his family (denied by the Government).

And then there are rumours about discipline issues and the like (also denied by the Government) that always circulate when there's a rushed departure like this.

The nature of the release does nothing to quell those - and when they are not true it's simply not fair on Apiata.

Or maybe Apiata's departure relates to pay and conditions - the rest of the Armed Forces are certainly complaining.

Are our SAS and the associated special forces’ soldiers remunerated properly?

Do the SAS have the right numbers to ward off attrition issues?

Are there the right pathways for experienced career soldiers like Apiata to stay in the services?

I'm really surprised there was no exit strategy for Apiata.

There's no special role designated for him, no matter how small to keep him attached to the forces - for want of a better description, some sort of "cushy retirement number".

Apiata is going to work for the High Wire Trust - it works with troubled youth.

But the Government/Army has its own programme - the so-called "boot camps". Wouldn't Apiata have been the ideal man for this?

A roving role up and down the country - he could have been put in a "civilianised role" and paid a decent wedge.

Clearly the Army had no plan for dealing with Apiata - its been a shambles.

And the very least, they should have given him some sort of send-off where he could extol the virtues of a career as a soldier.

Maybe the Defence Force muzzled him because they didn't want media asking about morale and pay issues?

It's clear that Apiata still loves the SAS - he's staying on as a reserve.

Maybe he didn't want a big send-off - but that doesn't stop something a little more organised than yesterday.

And what about the amount the Defence Force has pumped into the marketing and PR "brand Willie"? On those grounds alone it's a loss to the balance sheet.

The clumsy goodbye to Apiata is not a good look.

Put it this way: I can't see the NZRFU acting like this when Richie McCaw finally calls it a day.

Whatever the reasons behind this, Apiata's final salute from the top brass was not befitting of the great man's deeds.

----

Response from Chief of Defence Force Lieutenant General Rhys Jones:

Patrick, I can assure you and the public of New Zealand that Corporal Apiata, V.C. will get the send-off from the Defence Force that HE wants.

I think if the New Zealand public has learnt anything about Willie since he rose to prominence for his remarkable act of gallantry, it is that Willie is an incredibly humble man who has never sought the spotlight for himself.

Where he has made public appearances and supported causes, these have been where he sensed he could make a difference to his community and New Zealand.

So too it is in the way he wishes to leave the Defence Force. As Defence Force leaders we will first and foremost be guided by Willie’s own wishes to make the transition to his new role beyond the Defence Force in his own quiet and deliberate way.

As Chief of Defence Force, I believe he has earned that right. As to the “rushed” way you claim the NZ Defence Force handled this issue, our statement was of course in response to imminent news media stories we became aware of.

It was not the Defence Force that sought to initiate a story but your own brethren. Again, our statement was in accordance with Willie’s wishes.

With regard to the other innuendo and gossip you speculate about in your “opinion piece”, all I can do is refer you again to the statement that Corporal Apiata, V.C. made through the Defence Force yesterday afternoon.

As regularly voted one of New Zealand’s “most trusted New Zealanders”, I hope Patrick that you will take Willie’s word on this matter - if not my own - that he left his fulltime military role under good terms, and will continue his long association with the Defence Force as a Reserve Force member:

“This has been a decision that I have not taken lightly and it is one that has taken me many months to make. I am leaving to pursue my goals and to grow with my family. I am very proud of my service with the NZDF and I am very grateful for all of the support I have received from the NZSAS and the NZDF.”

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

30/01/2013 6:48:35 p.m.

Luke wrote:

I can't believe the idiocy of some people. The army doesn't give a toss about it's people! If you can't see that from the "civilianisation" or any of the other facts coming out (the top soldier leaving, as well as one out of every five other people in 2012), then you're a idiot. Don't believe the "comraderie" BS that they feed you to get you to accept the small pay cheque!

17/10/2012 10:08:11 p.m.

NZ General of the Army wrote:

Apiata is a great Soldier. I will be enlisting my self soon, Something big is about to happen and we only have 13k troops...we need more...but i guess we need more money to fund our troops also...difficult call...NZ needs to wake up!

13/08/2012 7:33:32 p.m.

Parson wrote:

The following statement (copied from the story above) just does not ring true. "It's clear that Apiata still loves the SAS - he's staying on as a reserve". Apiata probably has no choice in the matter. All regular force soldiers who leave the service are required to serve a specified time in the reserve whether they like it or not. The act of leaving the service is itself not straightforward. It is not like a job in civvy street. You just cant up and leave. Unless you have completed your engagement (contract) there are only a few ways you can leave the service, none of them easy and all indicating the greatest dissatifacion with the conditions of service. There is a lot more to this story of Apiata leaving the service than has been reported.

8/08/2012 9:03:56 p.m.

The Cows Boy wrote:

Cpl Apiata VC is a grown man and can make his own decisions. Those that have worked with these men know they do not crave the limelight, they are thrown into it for their biblical bravery and then the spinners within politics look to exploit (with facade of adoration) this for their own means ~ whether to justify a war, push their "new policy" or to simple shift the nations focus. Don't drag this NZ Hero into political babble. If nothing else Cpl W Apiata VC deserves what he asks for and at the moment that looks like peace. Mr Willie Apiata, Sir, we the New Zealand nation owe you a debt. Please go and live in peace & do what you want to do. You have done all this nation can ask of you. Peace Mr Apiata, peace.

3/08/2012 6:42:50 p.m.

nj wrote:

@ Cyril, no age limit, oldest i've heard of passing selection was 42. If you can do the job thats required, then there is no problem. @ Retention, lol at "media to blame". Welcome to the world of a salary paid position.

3/08/2012 6:25:36 p.m.

nmj000@gmail.com wrote:

@Greg, He isn't in the Territorials, he isn't even in the defence force but is part of the SAS reserves. Which are ex-SAS members who will from time to time, help train or may be even be asked to deploy.

2/08/2012 12:23:16 p.m.

Greg wrote:

I doubt he will even bother serving with the territorial force.

1/08/2012 7:54:53 p.m.

john truman wrote:

this is symbolic of the state new zealand is in generally. I am no longer proud to be a kiwi in fact i made a point of not disclosing it when in australia recently.The police are killing our youth in record numbers,the police botch everything they do,selling assets is not the answer,grow the economy for example by building locos here.And the politicians,look at helen clarke,she didnt want to stay in the NZ she helped shape,she brought a job in U/Nations with the peoples money,how else could you justify the $64 million we gave the UNITED NATIONS the year before she got the job,four times the previous annual payment to them.What a dam disgrace,and to think of all the Kiwi soldiers whom died for the New Zealand we have today. Sorry but i have had enough.

31/07/2012 6:51:12 p.m.

Retention wrote:

It was actually the Media that are to blame for Apiata's loss to defense force by putting him at risk in the SAS by posting close up photos of him all over our papers. As far as retention goes, the wages actually aren't as bad as people make out however the loss of paid medical prescriptions, subsidized rent and abusing the fact that you are evidently paid '24/7' so stand down for weekends is not a right but a privilege are factors that have recently made me consider leaving. I would hate to have to do the job of our CDF as he has a lot of weight put on his shoulders during trying times but I would like to see soldiers given fair stand down for weekends worked. Just because the defense force doesn't allow us to have a union or representive to speak on our behalf doesn't mean we shouldn't still have rights and be treated fairly. If we are paid 24/7 isn't there such a thing as minimum wage?

31/07/2012 6:08:19 p.m.

JC wrote:

Apiata's retirement - not resignation - from the armed forces was not "disorganised" by the military. His retirement was treated like that of any other serviceman. And why should it have been any different?

Patrick Gower's Entries

Previous123Next