Opinion: David Shearer has failed

Print

Thu, 01 Nov 2012 12:11p.m.

Duncan says one reason Shearer remains in the job is because there is a serious block of MPs who simply dislike Cunliffe - with a passion

Duncan says one reason Shearer remains in the job is because there is a serious block of MPs who simply dislike Cunliffe - with a passion

Labour promised an exciting back story that would impress and a new front man to rival the Prime Minister.

Sadly for Labour - they're still looking for that person. David Shearer has failed. Labour's lucky it's not getting done under the law for false advertising.

Let's be honest, Labour leader David Shearer doesn't have it. He's a nice, mild mannered, likeable, warm but a stuttering, incoherent mess that is the opposite of what an alternative Prime Minister should look like.

And before you say ‘give him some time’, he's had a year and I think he's gone backwards - not forwards.

He has no presence and his television performances are a disaster. That's where voters make up their minds.

The reason Shearer remains safe is disingenuous and it's time to call it.

Labour MPs believe Grant Robertson is perhaps the next leader, but they don't believe he's quite ready - nor do they want to install a gay leader just yet. It shouldn't be an issue - but it always is.

That's why he remains the deputy. He knows politics is all about timing. Shearer has become the fall guy. Like Phil Goff was. It's dishonest.

The other reason Shearer remains in the job is - and I repeat this from an earlier piece I wrote - there is a serious block of MPs who simply dislike Cunliffe - with a passion.

They will block any attempts to make him leader.

I tried to get a Labour face on TV this week to talk about capital gains taxes. I approached Shearer who was in Hokitika and too far away, David Parker in Dunedin and Cunliffe in Auckland.

Cunliffe was the easiest to get hold of. But, without naming names, the hoopla I was put through before he was 'allowed' on TV was fascinating. Even Cunliffe was nervous - but keen.

It took six hours of negotiating to get him on. It was quite simply, outrageous. It took me one text to get Russel Norman on the telly. It took two phone calls to get the Prime Minister to agree to a one-on-one interview.

Labour needs to look at itself. If reporters want to interview Cunliffe - they should be allowed to. I believe Labour is blocking his appearances or at least trying to limit them. Certainly on TV anyway. Although I notice Guyon Espiner exposed Cunliffe in the Listener like few others could do.

But back to Shearer. He was promoted too soon. He went from backbencher to leader. In the Mt Albert by-election he was protected. Melissa Lee was the media darling - so awful - no one else got a look in. But Shearer has been promoted above what he's capable of in my view.

I'm sure he's entirely capable behind the scenes - you don't do what he's done by being stupid - but I'm just saying he's not cut out for the hurly-burly, think-on-your-feet world of opposition politics. Robertson and Cunliffe are.

Shearer was handed the benefit of the doubt as pointed out by Gordon Campbell in a column this week and he's failed to deliver on any of it. The Prime Minister has had an awful year and his opponent should be knocking him out.

Instead, Key remains in the high 40s and is largely untouchable when he should be floundering. His unbelievable lack of knowledge and handling of the Dotcom affair and his refusal to move on John Banks were scandals made in heaven for a competent opposition leader.

Instead, Key has largely got away with it.

Put simply, Shearer does not look, act or sound like a man ready to take over the Treasury benches and drive New Zealand out of this recession. The voters see it.

They see a Labour Party unconvinced and confused by their own choice. Until that changes, Labour will stay in opposition.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

30/11/2012 7:41:48 p.m.

tony blair wrote:

richard pleaase tell the truth national have given us nothing but deficits labour gave us nine surpluses in a row . they just just come on here spout their hogwash nz is in a double dip recession we have the highest unemplyment since for ever oh i know duncan said when national was last in power . the reality just dont add up with their fairy land nationaal tales . the only reason no offence mr garner that national will win the election as the same as why they won the last becouse the mainstream media full on are biased against the opposition aand an independant report a few weeks ago said so . i notce the media shut that down rather fast lol lol .richard as obama said your top down economics never has and never will work . the yanks aare smarter than the kiwis electing the democrats now in 4 out of the last 6 elections .and the media are more balanced nbc and fox cancel each other out . all we have in nz is fox news style political covrage well it is the truth .they are useless they cant even get the teachers paid on time all key does turns out like nova pay all they do . with out the media richard national would be finished .

30/11/2012 7:32:00 p.m.

sharon wrote:

yea but hang on a year ago you and your side kick were urging labour to elect this guy . the biggest failure in nz is the mainstream media they need looking into like in the uk . they are anything but unbiased one report independant said so . when its 80% good reports on the govt party and as little as 20% the same for the labour party . your not free and fair your biased and unfair , the media need investigating you have the nz people terribly i bet crimminaly like in the uk .the only thing on the political nz media . i gaurentee it as a christian i know this is they day man is corrupt and rotten to the core and the only thin g in his heart is money and porn .he is wretched misrable blind and naked and he does not know it . rev ch 3 v20. they are rotten to the core polotics and the media .

21/11/2012 5:54:58 p.m.

Alison wrote:

I agree with Duncan Garner. Shearer is not a good front man but behind the scenes I am sure he will be an asset with his overseas experience. I think he was brought in as a personality look alike to John Key -the Mr Nice Guy PM, but John Key has graduated from Mr Nice Guy to the Smiling Assassin PM and now even further to "I know nothing about anything PM". I thought all along that Cunliffe should have been the front man -I am not sure why people in his Labour team hate him so much. But he is articulate and intelligent. Pity he got demoted just because he spoke the truth about his Dear Leader -sounds like North Korea politics doesn't. Shall we bow 5 times!!! We need a tough person at the top and those people may not have the most desirable personalities but they do get the job done. I believe like all the other commentators that Labour has not come up with good policies. Shearer should see the truth himself and step down honourably. It is not just about him but the Labour Party and all of future NZ. He can still be a great help in the ranks just not at the top of the rank and file.

7/11/2012 9:52:07 p.m.

angela wrote:

duncan gardner would talk any labour leader down even Obama if he stood. duncan gardner crucified phil goff as he promoted key . A right wing barrell of hot air in a job he can bully his views across. key is in trouble big time,not shearer.

7/11/2012 11:39:53 a.m.

Greg wrote:

Helen Clark had a great makeove to become leader of Labour. She even got married just too look good.
Politics is all just about about smoke and mirrors and sound bites. All Shearer needs is a similar makeover in hey presto. Labour can only win a election by default, when National get increadibly bad, they two more years to finish of on.

6/11/2012 9:14:58 p.m.

Ian Goldsmith wrote:

This is the second big swipe from Duncan Garner. To be honest, I thought we were about fairness in this country.

5/11/2012 8:04:09 p.m.

jony m wrote:

"He's nice, mild mannered, likeable,and warm"... ummmm.....wouldn't it be nice to only have those faults. I personally avoid "et tu brute" scenarios....that being said if he stands aside..there are couple of nice likeable and warm intelligent female M.Ps from Christchurch ,who also can hit hard and be heard....who deserve to be at least deputy prime minister... The opposition is trying to compete with John on his own terms..try a contrast...

5/11/2012 7:44:18 p.m.

frank wrote:

The problem the labour party has is direct result of the nine years Helen Clark was prime minister,during that time she could not allow anybody her make a decision ,she led the labour party like a dictator without leadership skills.The MP's at that time were scared of losing their jobs ,John Tamahere was the only one, so he had to go When clark lost the election she left the party without any leadership structure,no up and coming talent.David shearer is only a temporary leader The labour party is going to be out of government for a long time

5/11/2012 3:34:32 p.m.

Mike wrote:

Shearer/Labour suffer from a lack of policy.

Take there complaints about banks profits, which incedently with inflation haven't kept up with profits they made under Labour/Greens.

Now apply Labours Capital Gains Tax to the banks. We have heard that no CGT means the rich banks are not paying there share?

Okay Labours CGT is 15% so say the banks make $1 billion of exchange profit, thats capital gains and will see the banks pay $150 mil in tax. Thats good right?

WRONG!

The banks are traders, so any income they make from trading they pay income tax on, and the income tax rate is 28%. This means that on $1 billion exchange rate profit, the banks currently pay $280 mil in income tax, and Labour/Greens want to reduce this down to only $150 mil! This is the problem with Labour/Shearer/Greens, they say one thing and their policy does the opposite!

5/11/2012 3:01:07 p.m.

Jim Seaview wrote:

@ EDDIE wrote: "To all you Labour supporters....Labour are not polling badly, lost the election (worst result in 85yrs) due to their leader, it's all about policy and Labour have none! (well the ones they do have, no one is interested in them)...Labours most popular policies is when they have the lolly scramble and the feckless/lazy get more money for nothing. National campaigned on Partial asset sales and Labour STILL had worst defeat in 85yrs...doesn't that explain what the general voting NZ public think of labour?...I have found over the years when labour do badly it's always someone elses fault, and Labour (or their supporters) never actually look inwards at any problem but look outward and fingerpoint like a petulent child caught doing something naughty...'It's wasn't me, it's'..."
I AGREE with Eddies comments. The Labour Party has given us plenty of uncosted "promises" but they still have not defined what they clearly stand for and offering us "POLICY" which we can peruse.


Duncan Garner

Political Commentator

Duncan Garner is the host of TV3’s new current affairs show Third Degree and hosts RadioLIVE’s drive show from Auckland. He was the 3 News political editor from 2007 to 2012. Here he offers his views and commentary on the developments of New Zealand's politics.