Opinion: John Key refuses to rule out Winston Peters

Print

Mon, 24 Sep 2012 6:10p.m.

Duncan says Key needs new friends - and perhaps the new friend is the old enemy: Peters

Duncan says Key needs new friends - and perhaps the new friend is the old enemy: Peters

Opinion by Political Editor Duncan Garner

John Key had the chance to rule out Winston Peters.

He had the chance to say Peters still couldn't be trusted, that NZ First remains an 'unacceptable' and 'unreliable' coalition partner under his leadership.

But he didn't. He stopped short of that.

At his post Cabinet press conference he said he'll make a decision in 2014. But not before.

The Prime Minister clearly knows he has a problem.

He needs coalition friends in 2014. And right now his options are so limited - they're hard to spot.

John Banks and ACT are stuffed and mounted with sub zero poll ratings and even lower credibility.

Peter Dunne holds his meetings in a phone booth. And my sources in National tell me Key and his close allies have little time for the Conservatives - Colin Craig's lot.

But Key can count. More than any other politician, this Prime Minister knows about numbers - 61, perhaps 62 seats will govern, depending on the over-hang.

And right now if he got 45 percent of the vote in 2014 - he would be short of a forming a Government.

He'd be five or so seats short of Government.

He might be the largest party at the next election - but he needs to get over the line. The governing line.

He could take Dunne and the Maori Party's three seats and still easily be short by a couple of seats.

In short, this Prime Minister needs new friends - and perhaps the new friend is the old enemy.

Bring in Winston Peters. It's why Key refuses to close the door on Peters this far out from the election.

But it raises the question - just how principled were his last two calls in 2008 and 2011? Let me you remind me what the Prime Minister said.

"I want to lead an aspirational Government, I don't believe a Winston Peters Government does that."

"I'm about tomorrow - not yesterday."

"If Peters holds the balance of power then it will be a Phil Goff led Government."

"It's not a matter of political convenience, it's a matter of political principle - we just do not find NZ First acceptable."

Seems pretty clear doesn't it?

So how can John Key come back from that?

With huge difficulty I would have thought.

You are either principled and never work with Peters - or you're not and want to get back into power at all costs.

Key is showing all the signs of the latter.

Understandably he wants a third term. But he may have to rely on the 'unreliable' and 'untrustworthy' bloke to get him there. The bloke who 'is about yesterday, not tomorrow.'

And what sort of Government would that be?

One that staggers to an early death - like other Governments Peters has been involved in?

One that is hamstrung by Peters fighting with the media? One that is held to ransom, budget by budget?

Key better sell the assets quickly, because Peters will stop that programme in its tracks as one of the prices of support.

He'll also want to be a Minister.

How does that fit with Key saying in 2008 that "Peters won't be a Minister in any National Government I lead"?

I know you might say it's all too early to write this - but I disagree.

Key and National are in trouble. They need friends if they want a third term. Now their sights are starting to turn to the old enemy - Peters.

But surely Key is too principled for that.

He has drawn a line in the sand already regarding Peters hasn't he?

Surely he won't trade his past principles in the pursuit of power?

Will he?

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

10/11/2012 1:15:36 a.m.

Rod wrote:

MMP is about democracy and democracy is about free trade business and business is about wheeling and dealing to achieve the best possible result. John key is starting to show promise if he is prepared to accept a Winston Peters and NZ First 2014 coalition partner. That would show flexibility and compromise from our Prime Minister , which, is a fundamental ingredient under MMP. Winston was originally a National party minister until he exposed NZ dodgy tax system and Michael Fay/ David Ritchwhites tax and trade dealings. At the time that just didn’t sit right with the National party old guard Bolger and Shipley. Well done Winston and you are a better man for it but I suspect the Tax haven just shifted from the Cook Islands back to New Zealand. If ones residence is outside NZ the tax trust haven resumes. Peter Dunns legal tax avoidance mechanism for swindlers. Those people will meet there maker. A competent prime minister can work with Winston, Helen Clark successfully did this for three terms and Winston proved that he could be trusted. Bolger and Shipley didn’t have the skills of Aunty Helen that were needed in Handling Winston and a stable coalition, which, was a pity because they did more harm to the National party for incompetently handling Winston than Winston was proclaimed in doing. I think a modern day National / NZ first coalition Govt would be hugely successful. Winston Peters still has a lot to offer NZ, he proved this as a remarkable foreign minister as peace maker with United States of America under the last Labour ,NZ first govt. Winston was instrumental for children under 12 free heath and he has never deserted the elderly. He can be relied on alright, you just need to listen to him. Time to put water under the bridge boys and find some common ground where you can work together, after all , once a Tory always a Tory Winston.

30/10/2012 7:44:50 p.m.

liberte wrote:

The word that springs to mind is "expediency" Certainly, it is not "principle" But then,this is politics! liberte

29/09/2012 5:23:34 p.m.

jack wrote:

Will never happen. Key offered a good position abroad for Winston to get him out of the way but Winston didn't take it. Winston will do the same as in 2011, a day at a time. Duncan Gardner is just fishing.

28/09/2012 12:30:02 p.m.

Laurence Hill wrote:

My understanding is Key has already approached Peters and got laughed off.

27/09/2012 8:11:59 p.m.

Just Me wrote:

For Key it's "better the Devil you know than the Demon you do not(know)." If Winston Peters enters into the same sort of farcical political alliance as he did in the mid-90s election then NZ has reason for concern. Before the mid-90s(1996)general election Peters was saying to all and sundry neither NZ First nor him would enter into an agreement/coalition government with National.Within weeks of that 'promise' he chose to sleep with the political party he was against. It gave one the impression he was not interested in the reasons for people voting for him but more likely what he could get out of it(the 1996 election result)for himself.And it is likely he was more interested in self-interest and ego than what the voters in NZ really wanted i.e a change of arrogant and self-serving government to something more constructive and in favour of those who voted in that election. Though Peters is an excellent thorn in the sides of varios poltical parties he still comes across as ego driven and self-serving.And yet I have more time for Peters than for Key. He is the lesser of the two evils.

27/09/2012 12:12:20 a.m.

jan.. wrote:

Winston Peters will have a few more voters in the next election, Its over for John Key and his Pals..

26/09/2012 12:10:33 p.m.

Craig Young wrote:

I am actually beginning to wonder if the Conservatives *will* be able to form a coalition with National, given National's core asset sale policy and the confusing series of Conservative policies on the matter, which change from one month to the next.

National deserves clarity and coherent and consistent policies within its partner parties, as indeed does Labour. Indeed, National has ACT for that purpose, while Labour has the Greens.
By contrast, both New Zealand First and the Conservatives seem nothing more than cults of personality, whose policies are dictated at the whim of charismatic leaders, little else.

26/09/2012 6:45:49 a.m.

Peter mcCormack wrote:

I just wish MrPeters would make a statement like British MP Aneurin Bevan did a few years ago." No amount of cajoling, and no attempts at ethical or social seduction, can eradicate from my heart a deep burning hatred of the Tory party. So far as I am concerned, they are lower that vermin". Peter McCormack

25/09/2012 7:54:18 p.m.

Lesley wrote:

Well if your sources are correct then John Key needs to have a rethink about the Conservatives - Colin Craig's lot. I am thinking about voting for "that lot" next election. I voted National last election but they have become a bit too liberal now. 2014 is a long way off and a week in politics is a long time. As for the Dotcon saga. Your mate Patrick Gower has rained on David Shearer. Shearer gets it wrong - http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2012/09/shearer-gets-it-wrong/#disqus_thread

25/09/2012 4:27:01 p.m.

Craig Young wrote:

Yes, New Zealand First is a cult of personality and certainly opportunist and unprincipled enough to go into coalition with National. My question is whether National would be able to afford the number of expensive binding referenda that NZF would force on the rest of us, or whether it would firmly refuse to do so.