Opinions divided on waterfront waka

Print

Wed, 06 Apr 2011 6:04p.m.

Will it be a cultural icon or a waste of taxpayer money?

Will it be a cultural icon or a waste of taxpayer money?

By Adam Ray

Auckland will have a waka on the waterfront – but not everyone is paddling the same canoe.

Plans for the $2 million mostly taxpayer-funded PVC canoe are attracting strong views, both for and against.

Will it be a cultural icon or a waste of taxpayer money?

The canoe will be 60 metres long, 15 metres high and local hapu Ngati Whatua says it’s the perfect vessel to promote Maori culture.

A pavilion inside the waka will hold up to 1000 guests. It will host 17 days of Maori business and cultural events during the World Cup.

Many Maori say it’s a late arrival.

“We’ve had a Rugby World Cup Minister for three eyars and not one of them has thought Maori should have a profile, even though we are unique,” says Ella Henry of the AUT Maori Development Faculty.

The waka is designed to be portable – its walls are made of PVC fabric and the floors are wooden.

Ms Henry says it will be a draw card, even if it’s only temporary.

“I’m of the view that the container that’s in it does not undermine the quality of what is in it,” she says.

Tourists 3 News spoke to were divided. Opinion – even amongst couples – was split.

“My first impression is that it seems out of place,” says Canadian tourist Al Gilchrist.

“With all the beautiful modern boats here.”

“I think its intriguing, very interesting. Something one would want to visit,” says Eileen Gilchrist.

Maori Affairs Minister Pita Sharples wants the waka at Party Central, near the Cloud building.

“The programme has been set down and they’re talking to the cloud to make sure we work in conjunction with the main programmes,” he says.

Ngarimu Blair says the waka can be put up in just three days, and dismantled in half that time – perfect for taking overseas.

“What better way to promote New Zealand and Maori culture than with an iconic structure?”

Ngati Whatui still haven’t lodged a resource application but they’re meeting the Auckland Council next week.

They say it’s going to be tight to get it done in time, but they’ll have the waka ready for the World Cup.

They’re so confident, they’ve already started hiring performers for events at the waka during the World Cup.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

11 Apr 2011 11:15a.m.

Julie wrote:

the thing the media don't explain is that the actual structure costs less than half of the $2 million and the rest goes to fund the series of events that will be happening there.

07 Apr 2011 05:23p.m.

tieboat wrote:

Has anyone brought up the fact it is not a waka at all 0_o

07 Apr 2011 03:14p.m.

Xappa wrote:

There were many disparaging comments about the Crystal Palace - Paxton's revolutionary steel and glass creation built for London's Great Exhibition of 1851. Despite the criticism it was a huge success. However, when (after six months) the Exhibition closed, the structure wasn't handed over to the descendants of Boadicea.

07 Apr 2011 10:15a.m.

jay wrote:

$1.2 billion spent on SCF bailout and people are worried about this?

07 Apr 2011 10:14a.m.

de Leeuw wrote:

If Maori want to embarrass themselves with a plastic waka let them, but yes make it clear to the world that it is/was their idea and let them use their Treaty money as not to taint all New Zealanders.

07 Apr 2011 09:13a.m.

peter wrote:

The county is falling apart and they want to waste this money on a plastic piece of rubbish

07 Apr 2011 08:51a.m.

atrout wrote:

It is impossible to think of anything more embarrassingly stupid than this!!! Have we no pride in what represents us internationally, let alone on the local scene? Drop this - walk away from it and perhaps no-one will mention it again.

06 Apr 2011 10:45p.m.

The Dude wrote:

 Well done GOVT and Maori activists. You've just made us look like complete idiots to the world! While we ask for funds and take them from around the world we go build a flippin Plastic Maori boat at a cost of $2 Million. Does the Govt not realise the predicament it puts us in!

06 Apr 2011 08:37p.m.

Kim wrote:

Opinions divided is hardly an accurate assesment of comments on this or other articles both within tv3 and other news sites. 99 to 1 against would be a more accurate discription

06 Apr 2011 08:32p.m.

Noeline Craig wrote:

what a farce,plastic,I don't often agree with Labour or the Green Party but they are the only ones talking sense