• Full Story

Outrage after policing bill reversed

Print

Sat, 17 Sep 2011 10:52a.m.

The changes to the bill allow police to keep records of youths who are not convicted of crimes  (Reuters)

The changes to the bill allow police to keep records of youths who are not convicted of crimes (Reuters)

By Ofoi Taumoelau

Maori and Pacific Island youths are outraged over a bill that has been passed which allows police to keep details of people who weren’t convicted of crimes.

The Policing (Youth Identifying Particulars) Amendment Bill was passed in 2008, which meant police were not allowed to keep details that identified young people; such as finger prints, photos and any other form of identification, unless convicted of a crime.

However, in August, National and Labour made a deal to reverse this law, which means police have permission to retain personal identification of youth.

Young Maori and Pacific Islanders are statistically more likely to receive police attention; their details are more likely to end up in police files. Maori youth are detained more and that fraction of this is due to racial profiling.

Sinai Vaka’uta, the Team Leader of Fonuamalu, a Tongan Bilingual Unit, says the bill breaches basic human rights because it condemns innocent people.

“It is frightening because your fingerprint is your DNA and that’s an injustice policy for any country to uphold.”

The bill means the details of young people who have made mistakes but have not breached the conviction will be kept for future tracking.

Pacific island student Veisinia Ha’unga says our identification no longer feels personal because the police have access to it at all times.

“It feels like the Government is labelling us Maori and Pacific Island youth as future criminals because they feel the need to keep our identification.”

 A teacher at Kia Aroha College who wishes to remain annonymous strongly believes that if they are not convicted of a crime their details should be removed in order to prevent them from further potential harassment.

Ofai Taumoelau is working with UNICEF as part of the 3Youth project, an upcoming section of the 3 News website focusing on social issues and written by young people.  

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

21 Sep 2011 10:12a.m.

James Gollan wrote:

The Police are corrupt, if they have the details of people whom were arrested but found to be innocent, they could plant evidence at another scene to convict someone of an offence they did not commit. Get real folks, a lot of crooks who are racist, wear blue uniforms

21 Sep 2011 10:00a.m.

Steph wrote:

There have been a number of pieces of academic research done that show that Maori youth are more likely to come to police attention than Pakeha youth despite similar self-reported rates of offending. When they get to court Maori youth are also far more likely to gain convictions and custodial sentences while other young people are more likely to be offered diversion or a simple fine and discharge - so it is not necessarily that Maori youth commit more crime they are just a lot more likely to get caught and convicted. when it comes to our young people our police are often guilty of racial profiling.

19 Sep 2011 02:29p.m.

Mike wrote:

Maori youth are detained more and that fraction of this is due to racial profiling. \Maybe because they are the majority of offenders .Just a thought.

19 Sep 2011 10:05a.m.

Mel wrote:

This article is exactly right. Maori and Pacific Island youth are continually targeted by Police on a racially motivated basis. My colleague who trained in the NZ Police Force had to go on the beat with some officers who always pulled over and questioned the brown youth; when my colleague asked why they didn't question the white youth that they passed he was advised, "nah, they're alright, it's the brown ones who do all the crime". Actually, it's not always the 'brown ones' who do all the crime. In their youth, many other ethnicities are involved in criminal activities. It's just that anyone who isn't brown is more likely to get away with it because they're not targeted in the same manner that brown youth are. If the youth are not convicted, why hold onto their personal DNA and fingerprints? It smacks of hypocrisy and racial prejudice to me.

18 Sep 2011 03:58p.m.

Brett wrote:

I'm with Wolfman & Chris on this... the only reason why they had their fingerprints taken in the first place was because they commmitted a crime. I think anyone regardless of age who commits a crime should have their fingerprints on file as it allows the Police to track down offenders faster. This article is also a little misleading as it focuses on Maori & Islanders where as this bill is for ALL RACES regardless and as far as rascial profiling... that's bullshit... look at the criminal statistics or who's committing crimes!

17 Sep 2011 08:52p.m.

Dan wrote:

Law-abiding citizens shouldn't have to justify their freedom from state interference. If I don't want my fingerprints or DNA on file and I have been convicted of no crimes then the police have no justification to have that information. The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that this is a contravention of the human right to privacy. Pity our Courts can't strike down legislation on human rights grounds.

17 Sep 2011 04:16p.m.

michele mansini wrote:

nz must vote this gov't out in nov.
they are above the law and that is not how a democracy works. nz must dump national in nov.

17 Sep 2011 01:35p.m.

Tane wrote:

This article is misleading. Before this change only youth offenders sentenced by the youth court to the highest level of punishment had their fingerprints retained according to the police act. This law change enables the police to retain the fingerprints of all youths who are admonished (found guilty) - BUT NOT IF THEY ARE FOUND NOT GUILTY. Technically no one under 17 is 'convicted' unless their case is seriousness enough to be refereed to the district court. Sadly, under 17 year olds also commit crime, breaking into cars, burglary or worse. Having their fingerprints allows police to bring them to justice. The only people affected by this law change is offenders who have been found liable in youth court.

17 Sep 2011 12:49p.m.

Phred wrote:

Police can have my DNA and fingerprints any time they want. They can keep them on file if they want. Only crims and dodgy citizens have any reason for concern because they can be identified sooner.

17 Sep 2011 12:42p.m.

Wolfman wrote:

Don't do the crime and you will have nothing to worry about, you poor little precious theives.