• Full Story

Parliament passes Govt's welfare changes

Print

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 5:14a.m.

Paula Bennett (NZPA file)

Paula Bennett (NZPA file)

By Peter Wilson of NZPA

The Government's controversial welfare changes were passed into law last night after an angry debate in Parliament.

Social Development Minister Paula Bennett said her bill marked a turning point and the obligations it placed on beneficiaries were fair and reasonable.

Labour and the Greens said the changes would lock more people into poverty and children would suffer the most.

Key changes that have been enacted include:

* Sole parents will be work tested and have to look for part-time jobs when their youngest child turns six;

* penalties for non-compliance will be graded, becoming progressively punitive;

* abatement rates will be increased for some benefits to provide work incentives; and

* high users of hardship and emergency assistance will be targeted.

Ms Bennett said the Government was asking beneficiaries to make every effort to work - and there would be consequences for those who didn't.

"We're making the sanctions regime more effective - penalties will get progressively tougher if people continue to fail to meet their obligations," she said during the third reading debate on the bill.

"We're serious about holding people to their obligations, we owe this to them and the taxpayer."

Ms Bennett said 15 hours' work a week was a fair ask and there was no intention to force sole parents into unsuitable work.

She said that in a few months she would introduce a new requirement for sickness beneficiaries because at present there was no requirement for any of them to work regardless of the nature of their illness.

"We know that some people are capable of working part-time and we know it is better for them if they do," she said.

Labour's social development spokeswoman, Annette King, said Ms Bennett was running a political agenda.

"She has an unrelenting focus on work - but does she believe in caring for children?" Ms King said.

"The people most affected by this bill are sole parents and it is the children of those beneficiaries who will be hurt the most."

Ms King said that with unemployment running at 6.8 percent, there were 159,000 people out of work, yet the Government expected beneficiaries to find jobs.

"This will leave people in a poverty trap," she said.

Green Party MP Catherine Delahunty said the Government believed being poor was a crime.

"This bill will entrench poverty, more people will need foodbanks, it will cause extreme hardship and the cost will be carried by the most vulnerable," she said.

"A crisis has been manufactured and the extreme right, represented by Paula Bennett, will use the cost of income support as a stick to beat the anti-beneficiary drum. God help the poor of Aotearoa."

ACT MP David Garrett attacked Labour for opposing the legislation.

"They want people to be trapped in poverty," he said.

"They want them to sit at home on a subsistence income. They want them to do that so they will stay dependent on the nanny state and vote Labour for the rest of their lives."

Mr Garrett said the new measures were "a gentle nudge" to get people back into work and escape from "the disease of welfarism".

The bill was passed on a vote of 65 to 55.

NZPA

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

01 Sep 2010 12:52p.m.

Petra wrote:

MargoJH: Hi there - you sent me an email (thanks!) and I'd wished to reply to you, but my computer crashed so hard I needed to do a clean install of Windows. This means that I've lost all my emails. So if you read this, please send me the email again - I'd love to hear from you. Regards, Petra

27 Aug 2010 09:07a.m.

Trev wrote:

The worst people in society are those siding with Paula Bennett AKA Jenny Shipley.

I think Shipley ate far less MacDonalds however.

National brings out the redneck bigots... those that want to blame the problems of the world on anyone but themselves.

But who was it that caused the recesssion? Not beneficiaries that for sure because none of them have the ability to Influence the stock market.. none of them have the ability to influence sales in shops very much at all.

It was those rednecks who are screaming get a job, the ones stealing money from the stock market or finding convenient loopholes in the tax system to rort it.

Its businessmen and women all around the world who stood there with their hands out expecting large performance payouts while markets and businesses were crashing who caused all of this.

And what is the end result to their theft? to their dishonesty? or to their immorality.... National rewards them all with a large tax cut... for being redneck jerks.

When National is in power the ones screaming support at the top of their lungs are generally the inbred redneck buniness community.. who have token Asian or Maori counterparts but understand nothing of fairness or equality.

Paula Bennet is nothing more than a token redneck voicing garbage spouted to her by her redneck leader.

26 Aug 2010 02:25a.m.

Nikki wrote:

Alastair you arrogant prick. When I had my son I was married and we were both working, we could afford to have a child. Don't tell me it is my fault and I shouldn't have had that child in the 1st place you w****r. If I'd known the idiot prik of a husband couldn't keep it in his pants, I wouldn't have had a child.
I can't afford to feed my teenager healthy meals. We haven't had red meat for months and my pantry is looking pretty pathetic. Try living on a benefit for 6mths, with the children "you shouldn't have had in the 1st place". Your arrogance and ignorance truely disgusts me you selfish bast**d.

25 Aug 2010 09:57a.m.

Petra wrote:

MargoJH : thanks for the tip! (I'm Hire Me!, by the way - still looking for work - I'm a 47 year old single mum, with a background in advertising - which I had to give up when my elderly aunt got Alzheimers and the family decided that I was the best person to care for her and that she should move in with me, as she was a wanderer and refused to be placed in a home. I took care of her for as long as I could, but eventually she really did have to go to a home, whether she wanted to or not, sadly). If anyone has any work for me, I'm based in Rotorua and I can be reached via my email at petra.photo [at] xtra [dot] co [dot] nz Thanks!

23 Aug 2010 07:26p.m.

watching NZ wrote:

Marjo JH Answer:No I had a job,and people use to say to me,(how ur day go) and i,d say shit and they d say how come and i,d say because that is what i do in checking and doing maintenance in sewer pipes and best part about this, is that only maori s were selected to do this kind of work only and there was no amount of racist-qualification required to clean up others shit,now i have moved on,due to overcoming health issues and again in my current job will say,to all you blow-flies on here,don't make me laugh,when u talk about working and ur stinkin tax-money,because you are living off other taxpayers money also,so what kind of job do you Blow-flies do,that makes you so special in this society

23 Aug 2010 06:42p.m.

Kim wrote:

Most people seem to have missed the fact that (dare i say it)iwi based maori are effectivly insulated against the vast majority of these changes by Whanau Ora.
Now i know why the maori party voted for it, they have blindly been chasing that golden egg..the foreshore and seabed laws. They no longer (if they ever did) care or even consider the mainstream maori and the effects that national policy has on lower socioeconomic groups and are voting away thier souls for a useless peice of legislation.

22 Aug 2010 09:10a.m.

Phyllis wrote:

Have you noticed how fewer consumers are in the shops these days, some have none in site, also noticed how the grocery trollies have less non essential items in them and contain less. Lot of businesses in Kerikeri and Whangarei just dont have part-time jobs going, they appear to be laying off staff and reducing staff hours to try and stay viable, how does one comply with the new policy change in these areas? Also with home care being reduced for elderly, more to fit into each day, all things are relevant.

21 Aug 2010 10:28p.m.

MargoJH wrote:

Hire Me have you ever considered doing microstock photography. I am slowly working my way off the invalids benefit. A good camera & good photoshop skills are all you really need along with plenty of editing work, depending on what type of photography you do.

21 Aug 2010 10:46a.m.

Deane wrote:

Basically the new tough regime is a lot of noise and little action.

It fails to address the core cause of unemployment that is an economy that will be strong enough to generate jobs.

So far I have seen nothing, no leadership and fail to see what direction this government is taking us.

What I see is "populist" get tough on welfare policies that appeals to voters but in reality if there are no jobs, a weak economy, lower wages than all I see is the same old same old.
Again 2000 or so people applied for 150 supermarket jobs, evidence is everywhere that most people unemployed hate it and want to work.
Most of the sole parents I know are retraining because now they are single, they have found that they need qualifications to get quality jobs so their children can get a head start.

20 Aug 2010 05:26p.m.

Petra wrote:

I wonder if she thinks she's some kind of 'Minister of Punitive Prickery on the Poor and Disadvantaged' or 'Minister of Kneejerk Scapegoatism for the Switch and Baiters in the Beehive' (otherwise known as Master Baiters); not the Minister of "Social Development"? Where's the "Social Development" exactly, and what - prey tell - is it?