• Full Story

Parties slam Crafar farm sale to Chinese

Print

Fri, 27 Jan 2012 4:02p.m.

Labour leader David Shearer says the decision paves the way for New Zealanders to become "tenants in their own land"

Labour leader David Shearer says the decision paves the way for New Zealanders to become "tenants in their own land"

Political parties, including a government support partner, are outraged at the decision to allow a Chinese company to purchase 16 Crafar dairy farms, saying the land should remain in New Zealand hands.

Milk New Zealand Holdings, a subsidiary of Shanghai Pengxin Group, has been granted approval to buy the farms, in a decision announced by Land Information Minister Maurice Williamson and Associate Finance Minister Jonathan Coleman this morning.

The decision's been slammed as "economic treason" by New Zealand First leader Winston Peters, who believes the government purposely delayed the announcement until after the election.

"New Zealanders have every reason to feel outraged and betrayed. Our country is being run for the benefit of foreign companies and the international money industry."

Labour leader David Shearer says the decision paves the way for New Zealanders to become "tenants in their own land".

He's linking the sale to the government's plans to partially privatise state-owned energy companies, saying the government seems determined to sell its way to a brighter future.

Mr Shearer says the decision is "a massive kick in the guts" for a rival consortium of farmers and iwi, led by businessman Sir Michael Fay, which also made a bid for the farms.

"They were very keen to take over the land and make it productive again. That would have provided jobs for Kiwis, not seen profits disappear offshore."

Green Party spokesman Steffan Browning says the decision is short-sighted.

"Foreign ownership of the Crafar farms means that the profits will flow overseas," he says.

Maori Party co-leader Pita Sharples is "totally outraged" by the decision.

He says iwi should have been offered the first right of refusal to buy the land.

"Today a great wrong has been done to New Zealanders," Dr Sharples says.

"Our land is not just a commodity, it is a living, breathing part of our history, our culture, and our people. We just sold a piece of ourselves."

NZN

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

30 Jan 2012 02:33p.m.

eddie wrote:

Hmmmm Clarke, 7000 hectares and it's putting our food supply at risk!...really Clarke?, and the 360 odd thousand hectares sold to 'foreigners' under Labour/Clarks watch to all and every other country (but not the chinese) was/is ok in your eyes then?
So basically sell to anyone, just not the chinese eh?
You would be happy for Fay Richwhite to have bought it then?, ohhh wait he's a swiss national now...BUT he's not chinese eh?..the farms are private Clarke, no difference to you selling your house to an non NZ'r, or would you take a lower price on your house so it's 'staying in NZ hands'...noooo, it's Keys fault...the Govt...ummm anybodies!! wonder who bloody organised a FTA with China, they should be shot...ohh wait.

Clarke = Hypocrite!

29 Jan 2012 10:11p.m.

Clarke wrote:

Fontera gets less milk solids because the product produced on Crafar farms is now headed off shore... with less milk solids to sell and put into production fontera will most likely look at raising the wholesale price of milk and dairy products. One reason the government could have used that wouldnt have been challenged was protecting his own countries food supply. I dont care if the investors are chinese, british or Australian.... when the world is demanding food and costs are rising we need to protect our own sources of food supply. John Key didnt want to stop this sale.... he had no intention of stopping this sale... otherwise he would have protected our food supply and didnt.

29 Jan 2012 09:58p.m.

Fellowes wrote:

The day that Mr Key's popularity died.

28 Jan 2012 02:53p.m.

matty wrote:

The way I see it there is only one person to blame here, Mr Crafar himself, for reckless financing and management of the properties. He put the land and our country in a vunerable position. The government didn't make the decision to sell to the chinese, after months of trying they realised that they couldn't stop it.

27 Jan 2012 11:25p.m.

bruce wrote:

John Key you are a 2 bit capitalist / a back alley trader and unkiwi you lost my vote and a countries respect. You say the law was on the chinese side yet you have the power to veto - please dont insult our intelligence with spin. You are a political prostitute and are selling our long term assets for short term financial gain instead of investing and backing NZers own ability to go forward. I am not maori but Ill march with my Maori brothers on this one. My partner is chinese so dont even start intimating that it is racially repugnant to be against this sale. I dont usually agree with peters but this is political treason and enough is enough. Time for Kiwis to stand together. A nation wide strike Is one vehicle we should seriously think about here

27 Jan 2012 11:08p.m.

Chris (no, another one) wrote:

Might as well ditch the monarchy so we can be a true Banana Republic.

27 Jan 2012 09:11p.m.

johnmillan wrote:

No Chris, it is John Key has made himself look like a prized idiot.Hope The Maori party makes the split and Key wont have the support required,is that is what he wants soon that will be what he gets,then Suppose you will jump the fence then, as you are a tosser your self.Or are you Alien in disguise.

27 Jan 2012 08:46p.m.

Carlos wrote:

That's business !

27 Jan 2012 05:14p.m.

Chris wrote:

Fine for Peter Sharples to be "big Chief " now while getting a cabinet post to allow this government to do as it has said it would.Truly a wasted vote for any maori that has a belief in NZ for New Zealanders.

27 Jan 2012 04:35p.m.

action needed wrote:

If Mr Sharples feels so strongly then he should pull his support from key and co,the maori party should never been part of that arrangement in the first place.
The farms are more about hocking off our land and has to be stopped,16 farms should have been sold individually,therefore providing 16 farmers and opportunity
to live a dream,overseas owners have taken away a valuable asset from our emerging generations,it just simply is wrong.