Paul Henry: ACT don't deserve to be in Parliament

Print

Wed, 23 Nov 2011 8:01a.m.

Paul Henry says the Green Party has run a very intelligent campaign

Paul Henry says the Green Party has run a very intelligent campaign

Political commentator Paul Henry says he does not think the ACT Party should be in Parliament after this election and the Green Party has run the smartest campaign this year.

On the ACT Party and John Banks, Mr Henry had this to say to Firstline this morning:

“I don’t think he deserves to, I don’t think ACT deserves to be there, I talked to [ACT Party leader] Don Brash yesterday and I said, ‘What do you actually stand for?’ And he said, ‘There are nine things but I can’t remember them,'” says Mr Henry.

On the flipside, he says the Green Party has run a very intelligent campaign, with its simplicity in terms of policy a real asset.

“The Greens have played a very clever campaign, they only have three significant policies, and they can all articulate them very well,” says Mr Henry, adding that those policies are very expensive.

However, he is warning their indecision in deciding which party they will or won’t work with post-election could come back to hurt them, as left-wing voters may give their vote to Labour if they see their voice could be wasted voting for a party which gets into bed with National.

• Live updates from the election campaign – click here

“It’s a very dangerous game that the Greens are playing, they’re playing the game very well, but they’re juggling a lot of balls. It seems inconceivable they’ll get less than 10 percent support, but what is going to lift them higher than that is swinging Labour and National voters,” he says.

Mr Henry says the last election showed how the Green Party can be affected when it lost a lot of swinging National voters by ruling out working with the right-wing party before the election.

He also believes Prime Minister John Key’s campaign to warn voters off Labour by suggesting they will put Mana Party leader Hone Harawira and NZ First leader Winston Peters into a position of power has "backfired".

“It’s political theatre and that’s all Winston is, he’s a political thespian,” he says.

Click ‘view video’ to watch the full interview.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

03 Dec 2011 11:02p.m.

Jesse wrote:

With all due respect to you Diane, I couldn't help but giggle at your exiguous and politically trite (aka leftist) comments. Yes, I think we all know that Paul Henry is pro National, he was once heavily tied in with the party. Paul was in fact discussing the election campaigns in reference to the results. I know, it was VERY subtle and the highly ambiguous context of the discussion made it VERY confusing to us all.

23 Nov 2011 03:07p.m.

Laverna wrote:

Roz is right. The disclosure might also make mention of Diane Foreman, with whom both Paul Henry and Don Brash have shared a close and highly publicised personal connection. Everytime Henry bags Brash I have visions of a couple of cock roosters squaring off against each other in the chicken coop.

23 Nov 2011 02:24p.m.

Lol wrote:

Whats funny here is the Gower has been making blogs, showing is political views supporting the left for weeks now, but a right wing person shouldnt be allowed to write articles?
Double standards left wingers?

23 Nov 2011 01:47p.m.

Diane wrote:

Paul Henry is now a political commentator? When did this happen? On tv3 on Monday evening he appeared on the panel and sounded very pro National. Duncan Garner said that at one point Paul was going to walk out because the worm was going against John Key. Both he and Duncan Gardener rubbished Phil Goff. According to Duncan Phil was only good for the 1st half hour. Duncan seemed more unbiased on the news last night and actually said that Goff was the better. Now Paul Henry is praising the Green party. We the viewers will not be taken for fools and no matter what Political commentators have to say we can make up our own minds thank you.

23 Nov 2011 01:43p.m.

John wrote:

Since when did this clown become a political pundit, wouldn't a shaved ape be cheaper?

23 Nov 2011 01:01p.m.

Barbara wrote:

Paul is a comedian, not always a good one but none the less not to be taken seriously. He will fit right into Australia.

23 Nov 2011 12:56p.m.

RobertM wrote:

One of the main strikes against the Greens and Labour is their opposition to offshore drilling for oil and lignite mining. Our economy needs to diversify.
But I agree with Mr Henry's comment today on Act. Act were supposed to be a Reaganite-Thatcherite policy appealing to go getting middle class. A party of liberal economics, tolerant and supportive of demographic, economic and social restructuring. Supportive of liberal licensing and zoning and hard line in support of a high tech military and effective policing.
The reality of Act in NZ is that it is not really supportive of market economics or the military and the Brash-sinclair supposition that maoris are the social and crime problem is nonsense. It would be obvious to anybody who gets around at night that the dumber half of the male white population under 25 is an equal or greater problem equally difficult to productively employ or find a niche for.
One little issue, the betrayal of the Air Forces strike force and the fake support of the Act party for the F-16s illustrate the problem. Even more than extra steel to add backbone to Australia's politicians and regional deterrence the RNZAF F-16 force of 22 falcons would have added a suberb high tech industry and training to the economy and would have maintained a large conservative armed force in NZ totally loyal to the USA. Essentially Clark destroyed a neccessary commponent of the constitution a large Air Force, possibly balancing an often left wing army and police.

23 Nov 2011 12:11p.m.

mike wrote:

When Paul makes these calls it is seen by all as pure posture. He is not alone. The comment about Peters is on the nose. I bet this so called political commentator has not even read the NZ First Election Manifesto - if he had done so he would not have made such a comment. It is so demeaning to one who has I believe had this country's interests at heart. If you leave it to National and Labour to have 100% control you deserve your fate. We have squandered our resources for the last 25 years - the debate is only about images on TV and little else. Paul has feasted on this viral approach. Where are the real journos that can gather information and actually come up with some independent thoughts.

23 Nov 2011 10:44a.m.

Jack wrote:

Willbur. Too right! First thing I thought when i heard 'political commentator'! what a joke

23 Nov 2011 10:35a.m.

Memo wrote:

Paul Henry should not be allowed to leave the country he should be deported. TV3 are flogging a dead horse on this one...Paul Henry is a smooth talker but listen long enough and you will realize the darker smutty side of this character...he easily slides into the gutter with little provocation...go Paul, go away to Aus!?!?