• Full Story

Pengxin slams Fay-led Crafar bid

Print

Tue, 21 Feb 2012 4:02p.m.

The purchase of large blocks of farmland by foreigners is in the Government's sights (file)

The purchase of large blocks of farmland by foreigners is in the Government's sights (file)

The Crafar Farms Independent Purchaser Group (CFIPG), led by former merchant banker Michael Fay, has pulled its bid to buy 16 central North Island dairy farms "out of thin air" and isn't open to the same level of scrutiny as Shanghai Pengxin, the Chinese company says.

Pengxin says no-one can hold CFIPG to account for its promises if it's successful in derailing the existing offer for the Crafar family farms.

The $171.5 million offer is nothing more than a "phantom bid" whose benefits start and stop with improvements to the land.

"They can promise whatever they like, even though they have not done due diligence on the properties, because no-one could hold them to their promises, even if they ever succeed in having an offer for the properties accepted," Pengxin spokesman Cedric Allen said in a statement.

"Our bid has been accepted by the receiver, and the Overseas Investment Office will make sure we keep our promises if they give their approval following the current review."

The protracted battle for the Crafar farms took an unexpected turn last week when Justice Forrest Miller sent Pengxin's successful application back to the Overseas Investment Office (OIO) for consideration, saying the department materially overstated its economic benefits by using an inadequate testing methodology.

The Fay-led CFIPG made a new submission to the OIO, saying it won't budge on price, but will spend $18 million upgrading the land over three years, which will lead to an estimated 25 percent to 30 percent improvement in production.

That offer has previously been knocked backed by receiver KordaMentha as being too low.

Pengxin reportedly offered $210 million for the farms and said today it will spend $18.7 million upgrading the farms, $15.5 million of which will be in the first three years.

Mr Allen said a campaign of half-truths had been run against Pengxin, and that while it is a major property developer, it also has mining assets in the Republic of Congo, a successful cropping farm in Bolivia and sheep breeding operations in China.

The purchase of large blocks of farmland by foreigners has been in the Government's sights after the aborted bid for the Crafar farms in 2010 by Hong Kong Exchange-listed Natural Dairy (NZ).

Other Chinese companies interested in investing in various sectors of the New Zealand economy are closely watching our bid to become involved in the dairy industry in New Zealand and will be encouraged if approval is given," Mr Allen said.

"But like Shanghai Pengxin, they will also be disappointed to see the level of anti-Chinese sentiment expressed in the recent months and the lengthy, expensive and uncertain approval process will be discouraging."

NZN

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

21 Feb 2012 06:01p.m.

Mike wrote:

$171.5 mil vs $210+18.7 = $228.7

This is $57.2 mil more, ie 1/3 more than Fay is offering.

As for the anti-chinese claims. The farms are too spread out for it to be worth making a China only production facility so they will use this as a learning experience - much like overseas students paying to visit NZ for education. I expect a strong support structure will be needed to for it - more income for NZ.

NZ also invests overseas, eg Fonterra has purchased assets overseas costing a lot more than $200 mil NZ$. We live in a world market and if we close everything on a basis of racist bigotry it will not help NZ.

What happens if the chinese bid fails? Given they have had the OIO and the receivers approve the bid, and have acted on it, to turn around now will open up NZ to being sued with a high chance the chinese would win such a case. So basically we would have millions in legal costs, plus whatever damages, plus costs. The $57 difference could easily ballon to more like $100 mil, ie 2/3 the entire Fay bid and that is a cost to NZ public/private and NZ international reputation which may cost us many times $100 mil.

NZ needs to have a law and then use it. We need laws which are not re-invented by justices. Not enough reason was given for the change and the justice ignored 6 years of legal practise in his creating a new test which intends basically to block all overseas purchases if a Kiwi offers $1. It can't have this law for Maori and different law for non-Maori locally here in NZ. It can't have this racist handling of chinese either. We need laws which are not racist.

We had Fonterra invest in China a few years ago, lost over $300 milion when Helen decided chinese babies dying was less important than sweeping the disaster under the carpet. Overseas investments are always fragile. Overseas investments are not all one way, as the Sanlu $300+ mil Fonterra invested in China showed.

21 Feb 2012 05:23p.m.

starlight wrote:

Why is it so important for the chinese govt to own a peice
of valuable farm land in nz,when the chinese govt denies
anyone from owning land in china.